| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 351 of 494) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30937) |
(30938-32460) |
(32461-49324) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | bnj1030 35001* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} & ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜃′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜁) & ⊢ (𝜂′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜂) & ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ ((𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑗 E 𝑖) → 𝜂′)) & ⊢ (𝜑0 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜎 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1124 35002 | Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1133 35003* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅}) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1128 35004* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜃′ ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1127 35005 | Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1125 35006 | Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → trCl(𝑌, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1145 35007* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅}) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ((𝑖 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑖 = suc 𝑗))) ⇒ ⊢ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | bnj1147 35008 | Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | bnj1137 35009* | Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ trCl (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1148 35010 | Property of pred. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1136 35011* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ trCl (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1152 35012 | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌𝑅𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1154 35013* | Property of Fr. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1171 35014 | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)))) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1172 35015 | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = ( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐵) & ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1173 35016 | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = ( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1174 35017 | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = ( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐵) & ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶)))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1175 35018 | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = ( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤𝑅𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1176 35019* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V)) & ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶)))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1177 35020 | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1186 35021* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1190 35022* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑤) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1189 35023* | Technical lemma for bnj69 35024. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | bnj69 35024* | Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if 𝑅 is well-founded and set-like on 𝐴, then every nonempty subclass of 𝐴 has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1228 35025* | Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if 𝑅 is well-founded and set-like on 𝐴, then every nonempty subclass of 𝐴 has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1204 35026* | Well-founded induction. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1234 35027* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 | ||
| Theorem | bnj1245 35028* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐾 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (ℎ‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom ℎ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1256 35029* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 𝑔 Fn 𝑑) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1259 35030* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ℎ Fn 𝑑) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1253 35031* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1279 35032* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐸) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1286 35033* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1280 35034* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐸) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1296 35035* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))} & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑥, (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐿 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (ℎ‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑊))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑔‘𝑥) = (ℎ‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1309 35036* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1307 35037* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1311 35038* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) = (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1318 35039 | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = trCl(𝑌, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1326 35040* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) = (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1321 35041* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑓𝜏) → ∃!𝑓𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1364 35042 | Property of FrSe. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1371 35043* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 → Fun 𝑓) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1373 35044* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1374 35045* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 → 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1384 35046* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1388 35047* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)∃𝑓𝜏′) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1398 35048* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = dom 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1413 35049* | Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1408 35050* | Technical lemma for bnj1414 35051. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ trCl (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1414 35051* | Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1415 35052* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1416 35053 | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1418 35054 | Property of pred. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1417 35055* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1421 35056* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1444 35057* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥})) & ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜌 → ∀𝑦𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1445 35058* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥})) & ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓)) & ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = 〈𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜎 → ∀𝑑𝜎) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1446 35059* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑑(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1447 35060* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑦(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1448 35061* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑓(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1449 35062* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥})) & ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜁 → ∀𝑓𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1442 35063* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1450 35064* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥})) & ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) & ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓)) & ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))) & ⊢ 𝑋 = 〈𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜁 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1423 35065* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1452 35066* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1466 35067* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑓 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1467 35068* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑑 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1463 35069* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1489 35070* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1491 35071* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝑄 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ V) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1312 35072* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e., a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏} & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′} & ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝑍 = 〈𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {〈𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)〉}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = 〈𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1493 35073* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1497 35074* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 | ||
| Theorem | bnj1498 35075* | Technical lemma for bnj60 35076. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bnj60 35076* | Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1514 35077* | Technical lemma for bnj1500 35082. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1518 35078* | Technical lemma for bnj1500 35082. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑑𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1519 35079* | Technical lemma for bnj1500 35082. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉) → ∀𝑑(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1520 35080* | Technical lemma for bnj1500 35082. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉) → ∀𝑓(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1501 35081* | Technical lemma for bnj1500 35082. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝑓 = 𝑑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1500 35082* | Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1525 35083* | Technical lemma for bnj1522 35086. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1529 35084* | Technical lemma for bnj1522 35086. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) & ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘〈𝑦, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1523 35085* | Technical lemma for bnj1522 35086. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)} & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | bnj1522 35086* | Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)} & ⊢ 𝑌 = 〈𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉 & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘〈𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))〉)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | nfan1c 35087 | Variant of nfan 1899 and commuted form of nfan1 2200. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | cbvex1v 35088* | Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimalcased 35089* | Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimalcasei 35090* | Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimalcased 35089. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒) & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) & ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ ∀𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | dvelimexcased 35091* | Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimexcasei 35092* | Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimexcased 35091. See axnulg 35106 for an example of its use. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒) & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) & ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ ∃𝑧𝜑 & ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | exdifsn 35093 | There exists an element in a class excluding a singleton if and only if there exists an element in the original class not equal to the singleton element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srcmpltd 35094 | If a statement is true for every element of a class and for every element of its complement relative to a second class, then it is true for every element in the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | prsrcmpltd 35095 | If a statement is true for all pairs of elements of a class, all pairs of elements of its complement relative to a second class, and all pairs with one element in each, then it is true for all pairs of elements of the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | axsepg2 35096* | A generalization of ax-sep 5296 in which 𝑦 and 𝑧 need not be distinct. See also axsepg 5297 which instead allows 𝑧 to occur in 𝜑. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2377. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Aug-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | axsepg2ALT 35097* | Alternate proof of axsepg2 35096, derived directly from ax-sep 5296 with no additional set theory axioms. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | dff15 35098* | A one-to-one function in terms of different arguments never having the same function value. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | f1resveqaeq 35099 | If a function restricted to a class is one-to-one, then for any two elements of the class, the values of the function at those elements are equal only if the two elements are the same element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐷) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | f1resrcmplf1dlem 35100 | Lemma for f1resrcmplf1d 35101. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐷)) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |