P. 351 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35001-35100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bnj1175 35001	Technical lemma for bnj69 35007. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤𝑅𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∧ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1176 35002*	Technical lemma for bnj69 35007. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V))    &   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝜃 → (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶))))
Theorem	bnj1177 35003	Technical lemma for bnj69 35007. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V))
Theorem	bnj1186 35004*	Technical lemma for bnj69 35007. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧)
Theorem	bnj1190 35005*	Technical lemma for bnj69 35007. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑤)
Theorem	bnj1189 35006*	Technical lemma for bnj69 35007. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
21.4.3  The existence of a minimal element in certain classes
Theorem	bnj69 35007*	Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if 𝑅 is well-founded and set-like on 𝐴, then every nonempty subclass of 𝐴 has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	bnj1228 35008*	Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if 𝑅 is well-founded and set-like on 𝐴, then every nonempty subclass of 𝐴 has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
21.4.4  Well-founded induction
Theorem	bnj1204 35009*	Well-founded induction. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	bnj1234 35010*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷
Theorem	bnj1245 35011*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (ℎ‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom ℎ ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1256 35012*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 𝑔 Fn 𝑑)
Theorem	bnj1259 35013*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ℎ Fn 𝑑)
Theorem	bnj1253 35014*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	bnj1279 35015*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐸) = ∅)
Theorem	bnj1286 35016*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐷)
Theorem	bnj1280 35017*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∩ 𝐸) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1296 35018*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∣ (𝑔‘𝑥) ≠ (ℎ‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) ≠ (ℎ ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑥, (ℎ ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (ℎ Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (ℎ‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑊))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑔‘𝑥) = (ℎ‘𝑥))
Theorem	bnj1309 35019*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1307 35020*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	bnj1311 35021*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) = (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))
Theorem	bnj1318 35022	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = trCl(𝑌, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj1326 35023*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷) = (ℎ ↾ 𝐷))
Theorem	bnj1321 35024*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑓𝜏) → ∃!𝑓𝜏)
Theorem	bnj1364 35025	Property of FrSe. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1371 35026*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 → Fun 𝑓)
Theorem	bnj1373 35027*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
Theorem	bnj1374 35028*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 → 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	bnj1384 35029*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun 𝑃)
Theorem	bnj1388 35030*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)∃𝑓𝜏′)
Theorem	bnj1398 35031*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = dom 𝑃)
Theorem	bnj1413 35032*	Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj1408 35033*	Technical lemma for bnj1414 35034. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ trCl (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1414 35034*	Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1415 35035*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj1416 35036	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1418 35037	Property of pred. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	bnj1417 35038*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∪ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj1421 35039*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → dom 𝑃 = trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → Fun 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1444 35040*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜌 → ∀𝑦𝜌)
Theorem	bnj1445 35041*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜎 → ∀𝑑𝜎)
Theorem	bnj1446 35042*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑑(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1447 35043*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑦(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1448 35044*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊) → ∀𝑓(𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1449 35045*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁 → ∀𝑓𝜁)
Theorem	bnj1442 35046*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1450 35047*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥}))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝜁 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝜌 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑦} ∪ trCl(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜎 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁 → (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1423 35048*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑃 Fn trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
Theorem	bnj1452 35049*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1466 35050*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑓 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1467 35051*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑄 → ∀𝑑 𝑤 ∈ 𝑄)
Theorem	bnj1463 35052*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑄‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 Fn 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	bnj1489 35053*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑄 ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj1491 35054*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝑄 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑄 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ V) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
Theorem	bnj1312 35055*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e., a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ ∃𝑓𝜏}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ ∅))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜏′ ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜏)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ pred (𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝜏′}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑃 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑃 ∪ {⟨𝑥, (𝐺‘𝑍)⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = ⟨𝑧, (𝑄 ↾ pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1493 35056*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 dom 𝑓 = ({𝑥} ∪ trCl(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj1497 35057*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔
Theorem	bnj1498 35058*	Technical lemma for bnj60 35059. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
21.4.5  Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3
Theorem	bnj60 35059*	Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1514 35060*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35065. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))
Theorem	bnj1518 35061*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35065. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑑𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1519 35062*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35065. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) → ∀𝑑(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1520 35063*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35065. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) → ∀𝑓(𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1501 35064*	Technical lemma for bnj1500 35065. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝑓 = 𝑑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
21.4.6  Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3
Theorem	bnj1500 35065*	Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1525 35066*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35069. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1529 35067*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35069. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))    &   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑦, (𝐹 ↾ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))
Theorem	bnj1523 35068*	Technical lemma for bnj1522 35069. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
21.4.7  Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3
Theorem	bnj1522 35069*	Well-founded recursion, part 3 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝐻 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
21.5  Mathbox for BTernaryTau
21.5.1  First-order logic
21.5.1.1  Auxiliary axiom schemes
Theorem	nfan1c 35070	Variant of nfan 1899 and commuted form of nfan1 2201. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)
Theorem	cbvex1v 35071*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	dvelimalcased 35072*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	dvelimalcasei 35073*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from a universally quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimalcased 35072. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ∀𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜒
Theorem	dvelimexcased 35074*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	dvelimexcasei 35075*	Eliminate a disjoint variable condition from an existentially quantified statement using cases. Inference form of dvelimexcased 35074. See axnulg 35089 for an example of its use. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ∃𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜒
21.5.2  ZF set theory
Theorem	exdifsn 35076	There exists an element in a class excluding a singleton if and only if there exists an element in the original class not equal to the singleton element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	srcmpltd 35077	If a statement is true for every element of a class and for every element of its complement relative to a second class, then it is true for every element in the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	prsrcmpltd 35078	If a statement is true for all pairs of elements of a class, all pairs of elements of its complement relative to a second class, and all pairs with one element in each, then it is true for all pairs of elements of the second class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓))
Theorem	axsepg2 35079*	A generalization of ax-sep 5254 in which 𝑦 and 𝑧 need not be distinct. See also axsepg 5255 which instead allows 𝑧 to occur in 𝜑. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Aug-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	axsepg2ALT 35080*	Alternate proof of axsepg2 35079, derived directly from ax-sep 5254 with no additional set theory axioms. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	dff15 35081*	A one-to-one function in terms of different arguments never having the same function value. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)))
Theorem	f1resveqaeq 35082	If a function restricted to a class is one-to-one, then for any two elements of the class, the values of the function at those elements are equal only if the two elements are the same element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐷) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	f1resrcmplf1dlem 35083	Lemma for f1resrcmplf1d 35084. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐷)) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	f1resrcmplf1d 35084	If a function's restriction to a subclass of its domain and its restriction to the relative complement of that subclass are both one-to-one, and if the ranges of those two restrictions are disjoint, then the function is itself one-to-one. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 28-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶):𝐶–1-1→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶)):(𝐴 ∖ 𝐶)–1-1→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶))) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	funen1cnv 35085	If a function is equinumerous to ordinal 1, then its converse is also a function. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ≈ 1o) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	fnrelpredd 35086*	A function that preserves a relation also preserves predecessors. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 16-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Pred(𝑆, (𝐹 “ 𝐶), (𝐹‘𝐷)) = (𝐹 “ Pred(𝑅, 𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	cardpred 35087	The cardinality function preserves predecessors. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → Pred( E , (card “ 𝐴), (card‘𝐵)) = (card “ Pred( ≺ , 𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	nummin 35088*	Every nonempty class of numerable sets has a minimal element. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ dom card ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Pred( ≺ , 𝐴, 𝑥) = ∅)
Theorem	axnulg 35089	A generalization of ax-nul 5264 in which 𝑥 and 𝑦 need not be distinct. Note that it is possible to use axc7e 2317 to derive elirrv 9556 from this theorem, which justifies the dependency on ax-reg 9552. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2371. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Aug-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	axnulALT2 35090*	Alternate proof of axnul 5263, proved from propositional calculus, ax-gen 1795, ax-4 1809, ax-5 1910, and ax-inf2 9601. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
21.5.2.1  Finitism
Theorem	prcinf 35091*	Any proper class is literally infinite, in the sense that it contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. This proof holds regardless of whether the Axiom of Infinity is accepted or negated. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝑛))
Theorem	fineqvrep 35092*	If the Axiom of Infinity is negated, then the Axiom of Replacement becomes redundant. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (Fin = V → (∀𝑤∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))))
Theorem	fineqvpow 35093*	If the Axiom of Infinity is negated, then the Axiom of Power Sets becomes redundant. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (Fin = V → ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	fineqvac 35094	If the Axiom of Infinity is negated, then the Axiom of Choice becomes redundant. For a shorter proof using ax-rep 5237 and ax-pow 5323, see fineqvacALT 35095. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 21-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (Fin = V → CHOICE)
Theorem	fineqvacALT 35095	Shorter proof of fineqvac 35094 using ax-rep 5237 and ax-pow 5323. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 21-Sep-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Fin = V → CHOICE)
21.5.2.2  Global choice
Theorem	gblacfnacd 35096*	If 𝐺 is a global choice function, then the Axiom of Choice (in the form of the right-hand side of dfac4 10082) holds. Note that 𝐺 must be a proper class by fndmexb 7885. This means we cannot show that the existence of a class that behaves as a global choice function is sufficient because we only have existential quantifiers for sets, not (proper) classes. However, if a class variant of exlimiv 1930 were available, then it could be used alongside the closed form of this theorem to prove that result. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	onvf1odlem1 35097*	Lemma for onvf1od 35101. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 2-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑥) ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onvf1odlem2 35098*	Lemma for onvf1od 35101. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 2-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑥) ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺‘((𝑅1‘𝑀) ∖ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑁 ∈ ((𝑅1‘𝑀) ∖ 𝐴)))
Theorem	onvf1odlem3 35099*	Lemma for onvf1od 35101. The value of 𝐹 at an ordinal 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 2-Dec-2025.)
⊢ 𝑀 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑥) ¬ 𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑤}    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺‘((𝑅1‘𝑀) ∖ ran 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ 𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ∩ {𝑢 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑢) ¬ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐺‘((𝑅1‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶)
Theorem	onvf1odlem4 35100*	Lemma for onvf1od 35101. If the range of 𝐹 does not exist, then it must equal the universe. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑥) ¬ 𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑤}    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐺‘((𝑅1‘𝑀) ∖ ran 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ 𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ∩ {𝑢 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑢) ¬ 𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑡)}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐺‘((𝑅1‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑡)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ran 𝐹 ∈ V → ran 𝐹 = V))