Theorem caofid2 6195

Description: Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
caofref.1	|- ( ph -> A e. V )
caofref.2	|- ( ph -> F : A --> S )
caofid0.3	|- ( ph -> B e. W )
caofid1.4	|- ( ph -> C e. X )
caofid2.5	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( B R x ) = C )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caofid2	|- ( ph -> ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R F ) = ( A X. { C } ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, B   x, F   ph, x   x, R   x, S   x, C

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x)   V( x)   W( x)   X( x)

Proof of Theorem caofid2

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		caofref.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> A e. V )
2		caofid0.3	. . 3 |- ( ph -> B e. W )
3		fnconstg 5480	. . 3 |- ( B e. W -> ( A X. { B } ) Fn A )
4	2, 3	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A X. { B } ) Fn A )
5		caofref.2	. . 3 |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )
6	5	ffnd 5432	. 2 |- ( ph -> F Fn A )
7		caofid1.4	. . 3 |- ( ph -> C e. X )
8		fnconstg 5480	. . 3 |- ( C e. X -> ( A X. { C } ) Fn A )
9	7, 8	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( A X. { C } ) Fn A )
10		fvconst2g 5805	. . 3 |- ( ( B e. W /\ w e. A ) -> ( ( A X. { B } ) ` w ) = B )
11	2, 10	sylan 283	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ w e. A ) -> ( ( A X. { B } ) ` w ) = B )
12		eqidd 2207	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ w e. A ) -> ( F ` w ) = ( F ` w ) )
13		caofid2.5	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( B R x ) = C )
14	13	ralrimiva 2580	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> A. x e. S ( B R x ) = C )
15	5	ffvelcdmda 5722	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ w e. A ) -> ( F ` w ) e. S )
16		oveq2 5959	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = ( F ` w ) -> ( B R x ) = ( B R ( F ` w ) ) )
17	16	eqeq1d 2215	. . . . 5 |- ( x = ( F ` w ) -> ( ( B R x ) = C <-> ( B R ( F ` w ) ) = C ) )
18	17	rspccva 2877	. . . 4 |- ( ( A. x e. S ( B R x ) = C /\ ( F ` w ) e. S ) -> ( B R ( F ` w ) ) = C )
19	14, 15, 18	syl2an2r 595	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ w e. A ) -> ( B R ( F ` w ) ) = C )
20		fvconst2g 5805	. . . 4 |- ( ( C e. X /\ w e. A ) -> ( ( A X. { C } ) ` w ) = C )
21	7, 20	sylan 283	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ w e. A ) -> ( ( A X. { C } ) ` w ) = C )
22	19, 21	eqtr4d 2242	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ w e. A ) -> ( B R ( F ` w ) ) = ( ( A X. { C } ) ` w ) )
23	1, 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 22	offveq 6186	1 |- ( ph -> ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R F ) = ( A X. { C } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2177   A.wral 2485   {csn 3634   X. cxp 4677   Fn wfn 5271   -->wf 5272   ` cfv 5276  (class class class)co 5951   oFcof 6163

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-coll 4163  ax-sep 4166  ax-pow 4222  ax-pr 4257  ax-setind 4589

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-fal 1379  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-ne 2378  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491  df-reu 2492  df-rab 2494  df-v 2775  df-sbc 3000  df-csb 3095  df-dif 3169  df-un 3171  df-in 3173  df-ss 3180  df-pw 3619  df-sn 3640  df-pr 3641  df-op 3643  df-uni 3853  df-iun 3931  df-br 4048  df-opab 4110  df-mpt 4111  df-id 4344  df-xp 4685  df-rel 4686  df-cnv 4687  df-co 4688  df-dm 4689  df-rn 4690  df-res 4691  df-ima 4692  df-iota 5237  df-fun 5278  df-fn 5279  df-f 5280  df-f1 5281  df-fo 5282  df-f1o 5283  df-fv 5284  df-ov 5954  df-oprab 5955  df-mpo 5956  df-of 6165

This theorem is referenced by: (None)