P. 63 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6201-6300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	abrexex 6201*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be thought of as B ( x ). This simple-looking theorem is actually quite powerful and appears to involve the Axiom of Replacement in an intrinsic way, as can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 5808, funex 5806, fnex 5805, resfunexg 5804, and funimaexg 5357. See also abrexex2 6208. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V
Theorem	abrexexg 6202*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. The antecedent assures us that A is a set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V )
Theorem	iunexg 6203*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A B e. W ) -> U_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex2g 6204*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A { y | ph } e. W ) -> { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3d 6205*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> { y | ps } e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3 6206*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> { y | ph } e. _V )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	iunex 6207*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be read informally as B ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- U_ x e. A B e. _V
Theorem	abrexex2 6208*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph is normally has free-variable parameters x and y. See also abrexex 6201. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	abexssex 6209*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both x and y can be free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ( x C_ A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	abexex 6210*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> x e. A )   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ph } e. _V
Theorem	oprabexd 6211*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> E* z ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> F e. _V )
Theorem	oprabex 6212*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> E* z ph )   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabex3 6213*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- H e. _V   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( H X. H ) /\ y e. ( H X. H ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = R ) ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 6214*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. w e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex 6215*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables x and y are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for C, which can be thought of as C ( x , y ). See comments for abrexex 6201. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B z = C } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 6216*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph normally has free-variable parameters x, y, and z. Compare abrexex2 6208. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- { z | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B ph } e. _V
Theorem	xpexgALT 6217	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4788 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	offval3 6218*	General value of ( F oF R G ) with no assumptions on functionality of F and G. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. ( dom F i^i dom G ) |-> ( ( F ` x ) R ( G ` x ) ) ) )
Theorem	offres 6219	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( ( F oF R G ) |` D ) = ( ( F |` D ) oF R ( G |` D ) ) )
Theorem	ofmres 6220*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike oF R which is a proper class, ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) can be a set by ofmresex 6221, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 6169, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for oF R to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( f e. A , g e. B |-> ( f oF R g ) )
Theorem	ofmresex 6221	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) e. _V )
Theorem	uchoice 6222*	Principle of unique choice. This is also called non-choice. The name choice results in its similarity to something like acfun 7318 (with the key difference being the change of E. to E!) but unique choice in fact follows from the axiom of collection and our other axioms. This is somewhat similar to Corollary 3.9.2 of [HoTT], p. (varies) but is better described by the paragraph at the end of Section 3.9 which starts "A similar issue arises in set-theoretic mathematics". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A E! y ph ) -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A [. ( f ` x ) / y ]. ph ) )
2.6.15  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 6223	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st
Syntax	c2nd 6224	Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function.
class 2nd
Definition	df-1st 6225	Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 6231 proves that it does this. For example, ( 1st ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 3 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 5163 and op1stb 4524). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 1st = ( x e. _V |-> U. dom { x } )
Definition	df-2nd 6226	Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 6232 proves that it does this. For example, ( 2nd ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 4 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 5166 and op2ndb 5165). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 2nd = ( x e. _V |-> U. ran { x } )
Theorem	1stvalg 6227	The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
Theorem	2ndvalg 6228	The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
Theorem	1st0 6229	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 1st ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	2nd0 6230	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 2nd ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	op1st 6231	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A
Theorem	op2nd 6232	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B
Theorem	op1std 6233	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 1st ` C ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndd 6234	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 2nd ` C ) = B )
Theorem	op1stg 6235	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndg 6236	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B )
Theorem	ot1stg 6237	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 6237, ot2ndg 6238, ot3rdgg 6239.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 1st ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = A )
Theorem	ot2ndg 6238	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6237 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = B )
Theorem	ot3rdgg 6239	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6237 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B , C >. ) = C )
Theorem	1stval2 6240	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 1st ` A ) = |^| |^| A )
Theorem	2ndval2 6241	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) = |^| |^| |^| `' { A } )
Theorem	fo1st 6242	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 1st : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	fo2nd 6243	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 2nd : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	f1stres 6244	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> A
Theorem	f2ndres 6245	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> B
Theorem	fo1stresm 6246*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. y y e. B -> ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> A )
Theorem	fo2ndresm 6247*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> B )
Theorem	1stcof 6248	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st o. F ) : A --> B )
Theorem	2ndcof 6249	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd o. F ) : A --> C )
Theorem	xp1st 6250	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. B )
Theorem	xp2nd 6251	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. C )
Theorem	1stexg 6252	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 1st ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	2ndexg 6253	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	elxp6 6254	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5169. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp7 6255	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5169. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	oprssdmm 6256*	Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ u e. S ) -> E. v v e. u )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> Rel F )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( S X. S ) C_ dom F )
Theorem	eqopi 6257	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ( V X. W ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) -> A = <. B , C >. )
Theorem	xp2 6258*	Representation of cross product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { x e. ( _V X. _V ) | ( ( 1st ` x ) e. A /\ ( 2nd ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	unielxp 6259	The membership relation for a cross product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. A e. U. ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	1st2nd2 6260	Reconstruction of a member of a cross product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	xpopth 6261	An ordered pair theorem for members of cross products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. ( C X. D ) /\ B e. ( R X. S ) ) -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) = ( 1st ` B ) /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = ( 2nd ` B ) ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	eqop 6262	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	eqop2 6263	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	op1steq 6264*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B <-> E. x A = <. B , x >. ) )
Theorem	2nd1st 6265	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. `' { A } = <. ( 2nd ` A ) , ( 1st ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1st2nd 6266	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1stdm 6267	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. dom R )
Theorem	2ndrn 6268	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. ran R )
Theorem	1st2ndbr 6269	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> ( 1st ` A ) B ( 2nd ` A ) )
Theorem	releldm2 6270*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( B e. dom A <-> E. x e. A ( 1st ` x ) = B ) )
Theorem	reldm 6271*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> dom A = ran ( x e. A |-> ( 1st ` x ) ) )
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 6272	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog of sbceq1a 3007 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4287). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` A ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	csbopeq1a 6273	Equality theorem for substitution of a class A for an ordered pair <. x , y >. in B (analog of csbeq1a 3101). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> [_ ( 1st ` A ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]_ B = B )
Theorem	dfopab2 6274*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph }
Theorem	dfoprab3s 6275*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
Theorem	dfoprab3 6276*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }
Theorem	dfoprab4 6277*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfoprab4f 6278*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfxp3 6279*	Define the cross product of three classes. Compare df-xp 4680. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
|- ( ( A X. B ) X. C ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) }
Theorem	elopabi 6280*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` A ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. x , y >. | ph } -> ch )
Theorem	eloprabi 6281*	A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } -> th )
Theorem	mpomptsx 6282*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	mpompts 6283*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. ( A X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	dmmpossx 6284*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- dom F C_ U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B )
Theorem	fmpox 6285*	Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where B ( x ) is not constant but depends on x. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fmpo 6286*	Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : ( A X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fnmpo 6287*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> F Fn ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	fnmpoi 6288*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- F Fn ( A X. B )
Theorem	dmmpo 6289*	Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- dom F = ( A X. B )
Theorem	mpofvex 6290*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x A. y C e. V /\ R e. W /\ S e. X ) -> ( R F S ) e. _V )
Theorem	mpofvexi 6291*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   &    |- S e. _V   =>    |- ( R F S ) e. _V
Theorem	ovmpoelrn 6292*	An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
|- O = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. M /\ X e. A /\ Y e. B ) -> ( X O Y ) e. M )
Theorem	dmmpoga 6293*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6289. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	dmmpog 6294*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6289. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	mpoexxg 6295*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ A. x e. A B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexg 6296*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexga 6297*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexw 6298*	Weak version of mpoex 6299 that holds without ax-coll 4158. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D   =>    |- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V
Theorem	mpoex 6299*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V
Theorem	fnmpoovd 6300*	A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> M Fn ( A X. B ) )   &    |- ( ( i = a /\ j = b ) -> D = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ i e. A /\ j e. B ) -> D e. U )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ a e. A /\ b e. B ) -> C e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( M = ( a e. A , b e. B |-> C ) <-> A. i e. A A. j e. B ( i M j ) = D ) )