Theorem lsppropd 14741

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), they have the same span function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsspropd.b1	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
lsspropd.b2	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
lsspropd.w	|- ( ph -> B C_ W )
lsspropd.p	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. W /\ y e. W ) ) -> ( x ( +g ` K ) y ) = ( x ( +g ` L ) y ) )
lsspropd.s1	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) e. W )
lsspropd.s2	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .s ` L ) y ) )
lsspropd.p1	|- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` K ) ) )
lsspropd.p2	|- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` L ) ) )
lsppropd.v1	|- ( ph -> K e. X )
lsppropd.v2	|- ( ph -> L e. Y )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsppropd	|- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` L ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, B   x, K, y   ph, x, y   x, W, y   x, L, y   x, P, y

Allowed substitution hints:   X( x, y)   Y( x, y)

Proof of Theorem lsppropd

Dummy variables s t are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lsspropd.b1	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
2		lsspropd.b2	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
3	1, 2	eqtr3d 2273	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( Base ` K ) = ( Base ` L ) )
4	3	pweqd 3690	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ~P ( Base ` K ) = ~P ( Base ` L ) )
5		lsspropd.w	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B C_ W )
6		lsspropd.p	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. W /\ y e. W ) ) -> ( x ( +g ` K ) y ) = ( x ( +g ` L ) y ) )
7		lsspropd.s1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) e. W )
8		lsspropd.s2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .s ` L ) y ) )
9		lsspropd.p1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` K ) ) )
10		lsspropd.p2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` L ) ) )
11		lsppropd.v1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> K e. X )
12		lsppropd.v2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> L e. Y )
13	1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12	lsspropdg 14740	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( LSubSp ` K ) = ( LSubSp ` L ) )
14	13	rabeqdv 2815	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } = { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } )
15	14	inteqd 3970	. . 3 |- ( ph -> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } = |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } )
16	4, 15	mpteq12dv 4208	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
17		eqid 2238	. . . 4 |- ( Base ` K ) = ( Base ` K )
18		eqid 2238	. . . 4 |- ( LSubSp ` K ) = ( LSubSp ` K )
19		eqid 2238	. . . 4 |- ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` K )
20	17, 18, 19	lspfval 14697	. . 3 |- ( K e. X -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) )
21	11, 20	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) )
22		eqid 2238	. . . 4 |- ( Base ` L ) = ( Base ` L )
23		eqid 2238	. . . 4 |- ( LSubSp ` L ) = ( LSubSp ` L )
24		eqid 2238	. . . 4 |- ( LSpan ` L ) = ( LSpan ` L )
25	22, 23, 24	lspfval 14697	. . 3 |- ( L e. Y -> ( LSpan ` L ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
26	12, 25	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` L ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
27	16, 21, 26	3eqtr4d 2281	1 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` L ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   {crab 2532   C_ wss 3220   ~Pcpw 3685   |^|cint 3965   |-> cmpt 4187   ` cfv 5372  (class class class)co 6075   Basecbs 13330   +g cplusg 13408  Scalarcsca 13411   .scvsca 13412   LSubSpclss 14661   LSpanclspn 14695

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4241  ax-sep 4244  ax-pow 4306  ax-pr 4341  ax-un 4573  ax-cnex 8260  ax-resscn 8261  ax-1re 8263  ax-addrcl 8266

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3687  df-sn 3711  df-pr 3712  df-op 3714  df-uni 3931  df-int 3966  df-iun 4009  df-br 4126  df-opab 4188  df-mpt 4189  df-id 4433  df-xp 4775  df-rel 4776  df-cnv 4777  df-co 4778  df-dm 4779  df-rn 4780  df-res 4781  df-ima 4782  df-iota 5332  df-fun 5374  df-fn 5375  df-f 5376  df-f1 5377  df-fo 5378  df-f1o 5379  df-fv 5380  df-ov 6078  df-inn 9284  df-ndx 13333  df-slot 13334  df-base 13336  df-lssm 14662  df-lsp 14696

This theorem is referenced by:  lidlrsppropdg  14804