Theorem lsppropd 14706

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), they have the same span function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsspropd.b1	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
lsspropd.b2	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
lsspropd.w	|- ( ph -> B C_ W )
lsspropd.p	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. W /\ y e. W ) ) -> ( x ( +g ` K ) y ) = ( x ( +g ` L ) y ) )
lsspropd.s1	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) e. W )
lsspropd.s2	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .s ` L ) y ) )
lsspropd.p1	|- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` K ) ) )
lsspropd.p2	|- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` L ) ) )
lsppropd.v1	|- ( ph -> K e. X )
lsppropd.v2	|- ( ph -> L e. Y )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsppropd	|- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` L ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, B   x, K, y   ph, x, y   x, W, y   x, L, y   x, P, y

Allowed substitution hints:   X( x, y)   Y( x, y)

Proof of Theorem lsppropd

Dummy variables s t are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lsspropd.b1	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
2		lsspropd.b2	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
3	1, 2	eqtr3d 2269	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( Base ` K ) = ( Base ` L ) )
4	3	pweqd 3679	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ~P ( Base ` K ) = ~P ( Base ` L ) )
5		lsspropd.w	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B C_ W )
6		lsspropd.p	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. W /\ y e. W ) ) -> ( x ( +g ` K ) y ) = ( x ( +g ` L ) y ) )
7		lsspropd.s1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) e. W )
8		lsspropd.s2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .s ` L ) y ) )
9		lsspropd.p1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` K ) ) )
10		lsspropd.p2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` L ) ) )
11		lsppropd.v1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> K e. X )
12		lsppropd.v2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> L e. Y )
13	1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12	lsspropdg 14705	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( LSubSp ` K ) = ( LSubSp ` L ) )
14	13	rabeqdv 2809	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } = { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } )
15	14	inteqd 3959	. . 3 |- ( ph -> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } = |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } )
16	4, 15	mpteq12dv 4197	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
17		eqid 2234	. . . 4 |- ( Base ` K ) = ( Base ` K )
18		eqid 2234	. . . 4 |- ( LSubSp ` K ) = ( LSubSp ` K )
19		eqid 2234	. . . 4 |- ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` K )
20	17, 18, 19	lspfval 14662	. . 3 |- ( K e. X -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) )
21	11, 20	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) )
22		eqid 2234	. . . 4 |- ( Base ` L ) = ( Base ` L )
23		eqid 2234	. . . 4 |- ( LSubSp ` L ) = ( LSubSp ` L )
24		eqid 2234	. . . 4 |- ( LSpan ` L ) = ( LSpan ` L )
25	22, 23, 24	lspfval 14662	. . 3 |- ( L e. Y -> ( LSpan ` L ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
26	12, 25	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` L ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
27	16, 21, 26	3eqtr4d 2277	1 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` L ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2205   {crab 2526   C_ wss 3214   ~Pcpw 3674   |^|cint 3954   |-> cmpt 4176   ` cfv 5357  (class class class)co 6058   Basecbs 13296   +g cplusg 13374  Scalarcsca 13377   .scvsca 13378   LSubSpclss 14626   LSpanclspn 14660

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-coll 4230  ax-sep 4233  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327  ax-un 4559  ax-cnex 8234  ax-resscn 8235  ax-1re 8237  ax-addrcl 8240

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-reu 2529  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3046  df-csb 3142  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-uni 3920  df-int 3955  df-iun 3998  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-mpt 4178  df-id 4419  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-rn 4765  df-res 4766  df-ima 4767  df-iota 5317  df-fun 5359  df-fn 5360  df-f 5361  df-f1 5362  df-fo 5363  df-f1o 5364  df-fv 5365  df-ov 6061  df-inn 9255  df-ndx 13299  df-slot 13300  df-base 13302  df-lssm 14627  df-lsp 14661

This theorem is referenced by:  lidlrsppropdg  14769