Theorem lsppropd 14136

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), they have the same span function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsspropd.b1	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
lsspropd.b2	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
lsspropd.w	|- ( ph -> B C_ W )
lsspropd.p	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. W /\ y e. W ) ) -> ( x ( +g ` K ) y ) = ( x ( +g ` L ) y ) )
lsspropd.s1	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) e. W )
lsspropd.s2	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .s ` L ) y ) )
lsspropd.p1	|- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` K ) ) )
lsspropd.p2	|- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` L ) ) )
lsppropd.v1	|- ( ph -> K e. X )
lsppropd.v2	|- ( ph -> L e. Y )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsppropd	|- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` L ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, B   x, K, y   ph, x, y   x, W, y   x, L, y   x, P, y

Allowed substitution hints:   X( x, y)   Y( x, y)

Proof of Theorem lsppropd

Dummy variables s t are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lsspropd.b1	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
2		lsspropd.b2	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
3	1, 2	eqtr3d 2239	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( Base ` K ) = ( Base ` L ) )
4	3	pweqd 3620	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ~P ( Base ` K ) = ~P ( Base ` L ) )
5		lsspropd.w	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B C_ W )
6		lsspropd.p	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. W /\ y e. W ) ) -> ( x ( +g ` K ) y ) = ( x ( +g ` L ) y ) )
7		lsspropd.s1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) e. W )
8		lsspropd.s2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. P /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .s ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .s ` L ) y ) )
9		lsspropd.p1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` K ) ) )
10		lsspropd.p2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> P = ( Base ` (Scalar ` L ) ) )
11		lsppropd.v1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> K e. X )
12		lsppropd.v2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> L e. Y )
13	1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12	lsspropdg 14135	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( LSubSp ` K ) = ( LSubSp ` L ) )
14	13	rabeqdv 2765	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } = { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } )
15	14	inteqd 3889	. . 3 |- ( ph -> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } = |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } )
16	4, 15	mpteq12dv 4125	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
17		eqid 2204	. . . 4 |- ( Base ` K ) = ( Base ` K )
18		eqid 2204	. . . 4 |- ( LSubSp ` K ) = ( LSubSp ` K )
19		eqid 2204	. . . 4 |- ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` K )
20	17, 18, 19	lspfval 14092	. . 3 |- ( K e. X -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) )
21	11, 20	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` K ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` K ) | s C_ t } ) )
22		eqid 2204	. . . 4 |- ( Base ` L ) = ( Base ` L )
23		eqid 2204	. . . 4 |- ( LSubSp ` L ) = ( LSubSp ` L )
24		eqid 2204	. . . 4 |- ( LSpan ` L ) = ( LSpan ` L )
25	22, 23, 24	lspfval 14092	. . 3 |- ( L e. Y -> ( LSpan ` L ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
26	12, 25	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` L ) = ( s e. ~P ( Base ` L ) |-> |^| { t e. ( LSubSp ` L ) | s C_ t } ) )
27	16, 21, 26	3eqtr4d 2247	1 |- ( ph -> ( LSpan ` K ) = ( LSpan ` L ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1372   e. wcel 2175   {crab 2487   C_ wss 3165   ~Pcpw 3615   |^|cint 3884   |-> cmpt 4104   ` cfv 5270  (class class class)co 5943   Basecbs 12774   +g cplusg 12851  Scalarcsca 12854   .scvsca 12855   LSubSpclss 14056   LSpanclspn 14090

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-13 2177  ax-14 2178  ax-ext 2186  ax-coll 4158  ax-sep 4161  ax-pow 4217  ax-pr 4252  ax-un 4479  ax-cnex 8015  ax-resscn 8016  ax-1re 8018  ax-addrcl 8021

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1375  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-eu 2056  df-mo 2057  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-reu 2490  df-rab 2492  df-v 2773  df-sbc 2998  df-csb 3093  df-un 3169  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-pw 3617  df-sn 3638  df-pr 3639  df-op 3641  df-uni 3850  df-int 3885  df-iun 3928  df-br 4044  df-opab 4105  df-mpt 4106  df-id 4339  df-xp 4680  df-rel 4681  df-cnv 4682  df-co 4683  df-dm 4684  df-rn 4685  df-res 4686  df-ima 4687  df-iota 5231  df-fun 5272  df-fn 5273  df-f 5274  df-f1 5275  df-fo 5276  df-f1o 5277  df-fv 5278  df-ov 5946  df-inn 9036  df-ndx 12777  df-slot 12778  df-base 12780  df-lssm 14057  df-lsp 14091

This theorem is referenced by:  lidlrsppropdg  14199