ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  oprabex3 Unicode version

Theorem oprabex3 6181
Description: Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
oprabex3.1  |-  H  e. 
_V
oprabex3.2  |-  F  =  { <. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( H  X.  H
)  /\  y  e.  ( H  X.  H
) )  /\  E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v
>.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f >. )  /\  z  =  R
) ) }
Assertion
Ref Expression
oprabex3  |-  F  e. 
_V
Distinct variable groups:    x, y, z, w, v, u, f, H    x, R, y, z
Allowed substitution hints:    R( w, v, u, f)    F( x, y, z, w, v, u, f)

Proof of Theorem oprabex3
StepHypRef Expression
1 oprabex3.1 . . 3  |-  H  e. 
_V
21, 1xpex 4774 . 2  |-  ( H  X.  H )  e. 
_V
3 moeq 2935 . . . . . 6  |-  E* z 
z  =  R
43mosubop 4725 . . . . 5  |-  E* z E. u E. f ( y  =  <. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R )
54mosubop 4725 . . . 4  |-  E* z E. w E. v ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  E. u E. f ( y  =  <. u ,  f
>.  /\  z  =  R ) )
6 anass 401 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f
>. )  /\  z  =  R )  <->  ( x  =  <. w ,  v
>.  /\  ( y  = 
<. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R
) ) )
762exbii 1617 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( E. u E. f ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f
>. )  /\  z  =  R )  <->  E. u E. f ( x  = 
<. w ,  v >.  /\  ( y  =  <. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R ) ) )
8 19.42vv 1923 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( E. u E. f ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  (
y  =  <. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R ) )  <->  ( x  =  <. w ,  v
>.  /\  E. u E. f ( y  = 
<. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R
) ) )
97, 8bitri 184 . . . . . 6  |-  ( E. u E. f ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f
>. )  /\  z  =  R )  <->  ( x  =  <. w ,  v
>.  /\  E. u E. f ( y  = 
<. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R
) ) )
1092exbii 1617 . . . . 5  |-  ( E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f
>. )  /\  z  =  R )  <->  E. w E. v ( x  = 
<. w ,  v >.  /\  E. u E. f
( y  =  <. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R ) ) )
1110mobii 2079 . . . 4  |-  ( E* z E. w E. v E. u E. f
( ( x  = 
<. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f >. )  /\  z  =  R
)  <->  E* z E. w E. v ( x  = 
<. w ,  v >.  /\  E. u E. f
( y  =  <. u ,  f >.  /\  z  =  R ) ) )
125, 11mpbir 146 . . 3  |-  E* z E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f
>. )  /\  z  =  R )
1312a1i 9 . 2  |-  ( ( x  e.  ( H  X.  H )  /\  y  e.  ( H  X.  H ) )  ->  E* z E. w E. v E. u E. f
( ( x  = 
<. w ,  v >.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f >. )  /\  z  =  R
) )
14 oprabex3.2 . 2  |-  F  =  { <. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  |  ( ( x  e.  ( H  X.  H
)  /\  y  e.  ( H  X.  H
) )  /\  E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x  =  <. w ,  v
>.  /\  y  =  <. u ,  f >. )  /\  z  =  R
) ) }
152, 2, 13, 14oprabex 6180 1  |-  F  e. 
_V
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 104    = wceq 1364   E.wex 1503   E*wmo 2043    e. wcel 2164   _Vcvv 2760   <.cop 3621    X. cxp 4657   {coprab 5919
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-coll 4144  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-reu 2479  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-csb 3081  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-iun 3914  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-ima 4672  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-f1 5259  df-fo 5260  df-f1o 5261  df-fv 5262  df-oprab 5922
This theorem is referenced by:  addvalex  7904
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator