ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  oprabex3 GIF version

Theorem oprabex3 6366
Description: Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
oprabex3.1 𝐻 ∈ V
oprabex3.2 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}
Assertion
Ref Expression
oprabex3 𝐹 ∈ V
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢,𝑓,𝐻   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑢, 𝑓)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑢, 𝑓)

Proof of Theorem oprabex3
StepHypRef Expression
1 oprabex3.1 . . 3 𝐻 ∈ V
21, 1xpex 4893 . 2 (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∈ V
3 moeq 3001 . . . . . 6 ∃*𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑅
43mosubop 4843 . . . . 5 ∃*𝑧∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)
54mosubop 4843 . . . 4 ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))
6 anass 405 . . . . . . . 8 (((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
762exbii 1659 . . . . . . 7 (∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
8 19.42vv 1967 . . . . . . 7 (∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
97, 8bitri 184 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
1092exbii 1659 . . . . 5 (∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
1110mobii 2123 . . . 4 (∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
125, 11mpbir 146 . . 3 ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)
1312a1i 9 . 2 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))
14 oprabex3.2 . 2 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}
152, 2, 13, 14oprabex 6365 1 𝐹 ∈ V
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1402  ∃wex 1545  ∃*wmo 2087   ∈ wcel 2209  Vcvv 2821  ⟨cop 3712   × cxp 4774  {coprab 6089
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4248  ax-sep 4251  ax-pow 4313  ax-pr 4348  ax-un 4580
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-iun 4014  df-br 4132  df-opab 4194  df-mpt 4195  df-id 4440  df-xp 4782  df-rel 4783  df-cnv 4784  df-co 4785  df-dm 4786  df-rn 4787  df-res 4788  df-ima 4789  df-iota 5340  df-fun 5382  df-fn 5383  df-f 5384  df-f1 5385  df-fo 5386  df-f1o 5387  df-fv 5388  df-oprab 6092
This theorem is used by:  addvalex  8217
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator