P. 62 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6101-6200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elopabi 6101*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` A ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. x , y >. | ph } -> ch )
Theorem	eloprabi 6102*	A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } -> th )
Theorem	mpomptsx 6103*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	mpompts 6104*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. ( A X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	dmmpossx 6105*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- dom F C_ U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B )
Theorem	fmpox 6106*	Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where B ( x ) is not constant but depends on x. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fmpo 6107*	Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : ( A X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fnmpo 6108*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> F Fn ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	mpofvex 6109*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x A. y C e. V /\ R e. W /\ S e. X ) -> ( R F S ) e. _V )
Theorem	fnmpoi 6110*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- F Fn ( A X. B )
Theorem	dmmpo 6111*	Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- dom F = ( A X. B )
Theorem	mpofvexi 6112*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   &    |- S e. _V   =>    |- ( R F S ) e. _V
Theorem	ovmpoelrn 6113*	An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
|- O = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. M /\ X e. A /\ Y e. B ) -> ( X O Y ) e. M )
Theorem	dmmpoga 6114*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6111. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	dmmpog 6115*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6111. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	mpoexxg 6116*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ A. x e. A B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexg 6117*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexga 6118*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V )
Theorem	mpoex 6119*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V
Theorem	fnmpoovd 6120*	A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> M Fn ( A X. B ) )   &    |- ( ( i = a /\ j = b ) -> D = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ i e. A /\ j e. B ) -> D e. U )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ a e. A /\ b e. B ) -> C e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( M = ( a e. A , b e. B |-> C ) <-> A. i e. A A. j e. B ( i M j ) = D ) )
Theorem	fmpoco 6121*	Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5594 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> R e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> R ) )   &    |- ( ph -> G = ( z e. C |-> S ) )   &    |- ( z = R -> S = T )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G o. F ) = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> T ) )
Theorem	oprabco 6122*	Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. D )   &    |- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- G = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> ( H ` C ) )   =>    |- ( H Fn D -> G = ( H o. F ) )
Theorem	oprab2co 6123*	Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. R )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> D e. S )   &    |- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> <. C , D >. )   &    |- G = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> ( C M D ) )   =>    |- ( M Fn ( R X. S ) -> G = ( M o. F ) )
Theorem	df1st2 6124*	An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | z = x } = ( 1st |` ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	df2nd2 6125*	An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | z = y } = ( 2nd |` ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	1stconst 6126	The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( 1st |` ( A X. { B } ) ) : ( A X. { B } ) -1-1-onto-> A )
Theorem	2ndconst 6127	The mapping of a restriction of the 2nd function to a converse constant function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 2nd |` ( { A } X. B ) ) : ( { A } X. B ) -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	dfmpo 6128*	Alternate definition for the maps-to notation df-mpo 5787 (although it requires that C be a set). (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- C e. _V   =>    |- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = U_ x e. A U_ y e. B { <. <. x , y >. , C >. }
Theorem	cnvf1olem 6129	Lemma for cnvf1o 6130. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ ( B e. A /\ C = U. `' { B } ) ) -> ( C e. `' A /\ B = U. `' { C } ) )
Theorem	cnvf1o 6130*	Describe a function that maps the elements of a set to its converse bijectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( x e. A |-> U. `' { x } ) : A -1-1-onto-> `' A )
Theorem	f2ndf 6131	The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function F is a function from F into the codomain of F. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
|- ( F : A --> B -> ( 2nd |` F ) : F --> B )
Theorem	fo2ndf 6132	The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function F is a function from F onto the range of F. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
|- ( F : A --> B -> ( 2nd |` F ) : F -onto-> ran F )
Theorem	f1o2ndf1 6133	The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a one-to-one function F is a one-to-one function from F onto the range of F. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
|- ( F : A -1-1-> B -> ( 2nd |` F ) : F -1-1-onto-> ran F )
Theorem	algrflem 6134	Lemma for algrf and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( B ( F o. 1st ) C ) = ( F ` B )
Theorem	algrflemg 6135	Lemma for algrf 11762 and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ( B e. V /\ C e. W ) -> ( B ( F o. 1st ) C ) = ( F ` B ) )
Theorem	xporderlem 6136*	Lemma for lexicographical ordering theorems. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.)
|- T = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ y e. ( A X. B ) ) /\ ( ( 1st ` x ) R ( 1st ` y ) \/ ( ( 1st ` x ) = ( 1st ` y ) /\ ( 2nd ` x ) S ( 2nd ` y ) ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( <. a , b >. T <. c , d >. <-> ( ( ( a e. A /\ c e. A ) /\ ( b e. B /\ d e. B ) ) /\ ( a R c \/ ( a = c /\ b S d ) ) ) )
Theorem	poxp 6137*	A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.)
|- T = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( A X. B ) /\ y e. ( A X. B ) ) /\ ( ( 1st ` x ) R ( 1st ` y ) \/ ( ( 1st ` x ) = ( 1st ` y ) /\ ( 2nd ` x ) S ( 2nd ` y ) ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( R Po A /\ S Po B ) -> T Po ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	spc2ed 6138*	Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.)
|- F/ x ch   &    |- F/ y ch   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) ) -> ( ch -> E. x E. y ps ) )
Theorem	cnvoprab 6139*	The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- ( a = <. x , y >. -> ( ps <-> ph ) )   &    |- ( ps -> a e. ( _V X. _V ) )   =>    |- `' { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. z , a >. | ps }
Theorem	f1od2 6140*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function of two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> C e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ z e. D ) -> ( I e. X /\ J e. Y ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ z = C ) <-> ( z e. D /\ ( x = I /\ y = J ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> F : ( A X. B ) -1-1-onto-> D )
Theorem	disjxp1 6141*	The sets of a cartesian product are disjoint if the sets in the first argument are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
|- ( ph -> Disj x e. A B )   =>    |- ( ph -> Disj x e. A ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	disjsnxp 6142*	The sets in the cartesian product of singletons with other sets, are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
|- Disj j e. A ( { j } X. B )
2.6.15  Special maps-to operations The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 5787) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 5857, ovmpox 5907 and fmpox 6106). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short.
Theorem	opeliunxp2f 6143*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for E instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 4687. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
|- F/_ x E   &    |- ( x = C -> B = E )   =>    |- ( <. C , D >. e. U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) <-> ( C e. A /\ D e. E ) )
Theorem	mpoxopn0yelv 6144*	If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
|- F = ( x e. _V , y e. ( 1st ` x ) |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( V e. X /\ W e. Y ) -> ( N e. ( <. V , W >. F K ) -> K e. V ) )
Theorem	mpoxopoveq 6145*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
|- F = ( x e. _V , y e. ( 1st ` x ) |-> { n e. ( 1st ` x ) | ph } )   =>    |- ( ( ( V e. X /\ W e. Y ) /\ K e. V ) -> ( <. V , W >. F K ) = { n e. V | [. <. V , W >. / x ]. [. K / y ]. ph } )
Theorem	mpoxopovel 6146*	Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.)
|- F = ( x e. _V , y e. ( 1st ` x ) |-> { n e. ( 1st ` x ) | ph } )   =>    |- ( ( V e. X /\ W e. Y ) -> ( N e. ( <. V , W >. F K ) <-> ( K e. V /\ N e. V /\ [. <. V , W >. / x ]. [. K / y ]. [. N / n ]. ph ) ) )
Theorem	rbropapd 6147*	Properties of a pair in an extended binary relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.)
|- ( ph -> M = { <. f , p >. | ( f W p /\ ps ) } )   &    |- ( ( f = F /\ p = P ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( F e. X /\ P e. Y ) -> ( F M P <-> ( F W P /\ ch ) ) ) )
Theorem	rbropap 6148*	Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation M expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: M is the binary relation W restricted by the condition ps. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
|- ( ph -> M = { <. f , p >. | ( f W p /\ ps ) } )   &    |- ( ( f = F /\ p = P ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ F e. X /\ P e. Y ) -> ( F M P <-> ( F W P /\ ch ) ) )
2.6.16  Function transposition
Syntax	ctpos 6149	The transposition of a function.
class tpos F
Definition	df-tpos 6150*	Define the transposition of a function, which is a function G = tpos F satisfying G ( x , y ) = F ( y , x ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- tpos F = ( F o. ( x e. ( `' dom F u. { (/) } ) |-> U. `' { x } ) )
Theorem	tposss 6151	Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( F C_ G -> tpos F C_ tpos G )
Theorem	tposeq 6152	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( F = G -> tpos F = tpos G )
Theorem	tposeqd 6153	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> F = G )   =>    |- ( ph -> tpos F = tpos G )
Theorem	tposssxp 6154	The transposition is a subset of a cross product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
|- tpos F C_ ( ( `' dom F u. { (/) } ) X. ran F )
Theorem	reltpos 6155	The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- Rel tpos F
Theorem	brtpos2 6156	Value of the transposition at a pair <. A , B >.. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( Atpos F B <-> ( A e. ( `' dom F u. { (/) } ) /\ U. `' { A } F B ) ) )
Theorem	brtpos0 6157	The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( (/)tpos F A <-> (/) F A ) )
Theorem	reldmtpos 6158	Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos F to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel dom tpos F <-> -. (/) e. dom F )
Theorem	brtposg 6159	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2019.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( <. A , B >.tpos F C <-> <. B , A >. F C ) )
Theorem	ottposg 6160	The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( <. A , B , C >. e. tpos F <-> <. B , A , C >. e. F ) )
Theorem	dmtpos 6161	The domain of tpos F when dom F is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel dom F -> dom tpos F = `' dom F )
Theorem	rntpos 6162	The range of tpos F when dom F is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel dom F -> ran tpos F = ran F )
Theorem	tposexg 6163	The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( F e. V -> tpos F e. _V )
Theorem	ovtposg 6164	The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When F is a matrix, which is to say a function from ( 1 ... m ) X. ( 1 ... n ) to the reals or some ring, tpos F is the transposition of F, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( Atpos F B ) = ( B F A ) )
Theorem	tposfun 6165	The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Fun F -> Fun tpos F )
Theorem	dftpos2 6166*	Alternate definition of tpos when F has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel dom F -> tpos F = ( F o. ( x e. `' dom F |-> U. `' { x } ) ) )
Theorem	dftpos3 6167*	Alternate definition of tpos when F has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 4555. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel dom F -> tpos F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | <. y , x >. F z } )
Theorem	dftpos4 6168*	Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
|- tpos F = ( F o. ( x e. ( ( _V X. _V ) u. { (/) } ) |-> U. `' { x } ) )
Theorem	tpostpos 6169	Value of the double transposition for a general class F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
|- tpos tpos F = ( F i^i ( ( ( _V X. _V ) u. { (/) } ) X. _V ) )
Theorem	tpostpos2 6170	Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel F /\ Rel dom F ) -> tpos tpos F = F )
Theorem	tposfn2 6171	The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( F Fn A -> tpos F Fn `' A ) )
Theorem	tposfo2 6172	Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( F : A -onto-> B -> tpos F : `' A -onto-> B ) )
Theorem	tposf2 6173	The domain and range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( F : A --> B -> tpos F : `' A --> B ) )
Theorem	tposf12 6174	Condition for an injective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( F : A -1-1-> B -> tpos F : `' A -1-1-> B ) )
Theorem	tposf1o2 6175	Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B -> tpos F : `' A -1-1-onto-> B ) )
Theorem	tposfo 6176	The domain and range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( F : ( A X. B ) -onto-> C -> tpos F : ( B X. A ) -onto-> C )
Theorem	tposf 6177	The domain and range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( F : ( A X. B ) --> C -> tpos F : ( B X. A ) --> C )
Theorem	tposfn 6178	Functionality of a transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
|- ( F Fn ( A X. B ) -> tpos F Fn ( B X. A ) )
Theorem	tpos0 6179	Transposition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- tpos (/) = (/)
Theorem	tposco 6180	Transposition of a composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
|- tpos ( F o. G ) = ( F o. tpos G )
Theorem	tpossym 6181*	Two ways to say a function is symmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
|- ( F Fn ( A X. A ) -> (tpos F = F <-> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) ) )
Theorem	tposeqi 6182	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- F = G   =>    |- tpos F = tpos G
Theorem	tposex 6183	A transposition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- tpos F e. _V
Theorem	nftpos 6184	Hypothesis builder for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- F/_ x F   =>    |- F/_ xtpos F
Theorem	tposoprab 6185*	Transposition of a class of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph }   =>    |- tpos F = { <. <. y , x >. , z >. | ph }
Theorem	tposmpo 6186*	Transposition of a two-argument mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- tpos F = ( y e. B , x e. A |-> C )
2.6.17  Undefined values
Theorem	pwuninel2 6187	The power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- ( U. A e. V -> -. ~P U. A e. A )
Theorem	2pwuninelg 6188	The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2020.)
|- ( A e. V -> -. ~P ~P U. A e. A )
2.6.18  Functions on ordinals; strictly monotone ordinal functions
Theorem	iunon 6189*	The indexed union of a set of ordinal numbers B ( x ) is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A B e. On ) -> U_ x e. A B e. On )
Syntax	wsmo 6190	Introduce the strictly monotone ordinal function. A strictly monotone function is one that is constantly increasing across the ordinals.
wff Smo A
Definition	df-smo 6191*	Definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. Definition 7.46 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.)
|- ( Smo A <-> ( A : dom A --> On /\ Ord dom A /\ A. x e. dom A A. y e. dom A ( x e. y -> ( A ` x ) e. ( A ` y ) ) ) )
Theorem	dfsmo2 6192*	Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Mar-2013.)
|- ( Smo F <-> ( F : dom F --> On /\ Ord dom F /\ A. x e. dom F A. y e. x ( F ` y ) e. ( F ` x ) ) )
Theorem	issmo 6193*	Conditions for which A is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.)
|- A : B --> On   &    |- Ord B   &    |- ( ( x e. B /\ y e. B ) -> ( x e. y -> ( A ` x ) e. ( A ` y ) ) )   &    |- dom A = B   =>    |- Smo A
Theorem	issmo2 6194*	Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
|- ( F : A --> B -> ( ( B C_ On /\ Ord A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. x ( F ` y ) e. ( F ` x ) ) -> Smo F ) )
Theorem	smoeq 6195	Equality theorem for strictly monotone functions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Smo A <-> Smo B ) )
Theorem	smodm 6196	The domain of a strictly monotone function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
|- ( Smo A -> Ord dom A )
Theorem	smores 6197	A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ( Smo A /\ B e. dom A ) -> Smo ( A |` B ) )
Theorem	smores3 6198	A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
|- ( ( Smo ( A |` B ) /\ C e. ( dom A i^i B ) /\ Ord B ) -> Smo ( A |` C ) )
Theorem	smores2 6199	A strictly monotone ordinal function restricted to an ordinal is still monotone. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.)
|- ( ( Smo F /\ Ord A ) -> Smo ( F |` A ) )
Theorem	smodm2 6200	The domain of a strictly monotone ordinal function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ Smo F ) -> Ord A )