P. 62 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6101-6200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	caovord3 6101*	Ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( z e. S -> ( x R y <-> ( z F x ) R ( z F y ) ) )   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x F y ) = ( y F x )   &    |- D e. _V   =>    |- ( ( ( B e. S /\ C e. S ) /\ ( A F B ) = ( C F D ) ) -> ( A R C <-> D R B ) )
Theorem	caovdig 6102*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. K /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( x G ( y F z ) ) = ( ( x G y ) H ( x G z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( A e. K /\ B e. S /\ C e. S ) ) -> ( A G ( B F C ) ) = ( ( A G B ) H ( A G C ) ) )
Theorem	caovdid 6103*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. K /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( x G ( y F z ) ) = ( ( x G y ) H ( x G z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. K )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A G ( B F C ) ) = ( ( A G B ) H ( A G C ) ) )
Theorem	caovdir2d 6104*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( x G ( y F z ) ) = ( ( x G y ) F ( x G z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x G y ) = ( y G x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A F B ) G C ) = ( ( A G C ) F ( B G C ) ) )
Theorem	caovdirg 6105*	Convert an operation reverse distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. K ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) G z ) = ( ( x G z ) H ( y G z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( A e. S /\ B e. S /\ C e. K ) ) -> ( ( A F B ) G C ) = ( ( A G C ) H ( B G C ) ) )
Theorem	caovdird 6106*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. K ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) G z ) = ( ( x G z ) H ( y G z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. K )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A F B ) G C ) = ( ( A G C ) H ( B G C ) ) )
Theorem	caovdi 6107*	Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x G ( y F z ) ) = ( ( x G y ) F ( x G z ) )   =>    |- ( A G ( B F C ) ) = ( ( A G B ) F ( A G C ) )
Theorem	caov32d 6108*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A F B ) F C ) = ( ( A F C ) F B ) )
Theorem	caov12d 6109*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A F ( B F C ) ) = ( B F ( A F C ) ) )
Theorem	caov31d 6110*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A F B ) F C ) = ( ( C F B ) F A ) )
Theorem	caov13d 6111*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A F ( B F C ) ) = ( C F ( B F A ) ) )
Theorem	caov4d 6112*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A F B ) F ( C F D ) ) = ( ( A F C ) F ( B F D ) ) )
Theorem	caov411d 6113*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A F B ) F ( C F D ) ) = ( ( C F B ) F ( A F D ) ) )
Theorem	caov42d 6114*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A F B ) F ( C F D ) ) = ( ( A F C ) F ( D F B ) ) )
Theorem	caov32 6115*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x F y ) = ( y F x )   &    |- ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A F B ) F C ) = ( ( A F C ) F B )
Theorem	caov12 6116*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x F y ) = ( y F x )   &    |- ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) )   =>    |- ( A F ( B F C ) ) = ( B F ( A F C ) )
Theorem	caov31 6117*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x F y ) = ( y F x )   &    |- ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A F B ) F C ) = ( ( C F B ) F A )
Theorem	caov13 6118*	Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x F y ) = ( y F x )   &    |- ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) )   =>    |- ( A F ( B F C ) ) = ( C F ( B F A ) )
Theorem	caovdilemd 6119*	Lemma used by real number construction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x G y ) = ( y G x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) G z ) = ( ( x G z ) F ( y G z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x G y ) G z ) = ( x G ( y G z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x G y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> H e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( A G C ) F ( B G D ) ) G H ) = ( ( A G ( C G H ) ) F ( B G ( D G H ) ) ) )
Theorem	caovlem2d 6120*	Rearrangement of expression involving multiplication ( G) and addition ( F). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x G y ) = ( y G x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) G z ) = ( ( x G z ) F ( y G z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x G y ) G z ) = ( x G ( y G z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x G y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> H e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> R e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ( A G C ) F ( B G D ) ) G H ) F ( ( ( A G D ) F ( B G C ) ) G R ) ) = ( ( A G ( ( C G H ) F ( D G R ) ) ) F ( B G ( ( C G R ) F ( D G H ) ) ) ) )
Theorem	caovimo 6121*	Uniqueness of inverse element in commutative, associative operation with identity. The identity element is B. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Sep-2019.)
|- B e. S   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x F y ) = ( y F x ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x F y ) F z ) = ( x F ( y F z ) ) )   &    |- ( x e. S -> ( x F B ) = x )   =>    |- ( A e. S -> E* w ( w e. S /\ ( A F w ) = B ) )
2.6.12  Maps-to notation
Theorem	elmpocl 6122*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, constrain the implicit pair. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( X e. ( S F T ) -> ( S e. A /\ T e. B ) )
Theorem	elmpocl1 6123*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, the first argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( X e. ( S F T ) -> S e. A )
Theorem	elmpocl2 6124*	If a two-parameter class is inhabited, the second argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( X e. ( S F T ) -> T e. B )
Theorem	elovmpod 6125*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) Variant of elovmpo 6126 in deduction form. (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
|- O = ( a e. A , b e. B |-> C )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> Y e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. V )   &    |- ( ( a = X /\ b = Y ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E e. ( X O Y ) <-> E e. D ) )
Theorem	elovmpo 6126*	Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.)
|- D = ( a e. A , b e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( ( a = X /\ b = Y ) -> C = E )   =>    |- ( F e. ( X D Y ) <-> ( X e. A /\ Y e. B /\ F e. E ) )
Theorem	elovmporab 6127*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.)
|- O = ( x e. _V , y e. _V |-> { z e. M | ph } )   &    |- ( ( X e. _V /\ Y e. _V ) -> M e. _V )   =>    |- ( Z e. ( X O Y ) -> ( X e. _V /\ Y e. _V /\ Z e. M ) )
Theorem	elovmporab1w 6128*	Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the first operand. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
|- O = ( x e. _V , y e. _V |-> { z e. [_ x / m ]_ M | ph } )   &    |- ( ( X e. _V /\ Y e. _V ) -> [_ X / m ]_ M e. _V )   =>    |- ( Z e. ( X O Y ) -> ( X e. _V /\ Y e. _V /\ Z e. [_ X / m ]_ M ) )
Theorem	f1ocnvd 6129*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> C e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ y e. B ) -> D e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B /\ `' F = ( y e. B |-> D ) ) )
Theorem	f1od 6130*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> C e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ y e. B ) -> D e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> F : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	f1ocnv2d 6131*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ y e. B ) -> D e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B /\ `' F = ( y e. B |-> D ) ) )
Theorem	f1o2d 6132*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ y e. B ) -> D e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> F : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	f1opw2 6133*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. This version of f1opw 6134 avoids the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ph -> F : A -1-1-onto-> B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( `' F " a ) e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( F " b ) e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( b e. ~P A |-> ( F " b ) ) : ~P A -1-1-onto-> ~P B )
Theorem	f1opw 6134*	A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
|- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B -> ( b e. ~P A |-> ( F " b ) ) : ~P A -1-1-onto-> ~P B )
Theorem	suppssfv 6135*	Formula building theorem for support restriction, on a function which preserves zero. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )   &    |- ( ph -> ( F ` Y ) = Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( F ` A ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
Theorem	suppssov1 6136*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: operator with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
|- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> A ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> B e. R )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A O B ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
2.6.13  Function operation
Syntax	cof 6137	Extend class notation to include mapping of an operation to a function operation.
class oF R
Syntax	cofr 6138	Extend class notation to include mapping of a binary relation to a function relation.
class oR R
Definition	df-of 6139*	Define the function operation map. The definition is designed so that if R is a binary operation, then oF R is the analogous operation on functions which corresponds to applying R pointwise to the values of the functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
|- oF R = ( f e. _V , g e. _V |-> ( x e. ( dom f i^i dom g ) |-> ( ( f ` x ) R ( g ` x ) ) ) )
Definition	df-ofr 6140*	Define the function relation map. The definition is designed so that if R is a binary relation, then oF R is the analogous relation on functions which is true when each element of the left function relates to the corresponding element of the right function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- oR R = { <. f , g >. | A. x e. ( dom f i^i dom g ) ( f ` x ) R ( g ` x ) }
Theorem	ofeqd 6141	Equality theorem for function operation, deduction form. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
|- ( ph -> R = S )   =>    |- ( ph -> oF R = oF S )
Theorem	ofeq 6142	Equality theorem for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
|- ( R = S -> oF R = oF S )
Theorem	ofreq 6143	Equality theorem for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( R = S -> oR R = oR S )
Theorem	ofexg 6144	A function operation restricted to a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( oF R |` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	nfof 6145	Hypothesis builder for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
|- F/_ x R   =>    |- F/_ x oF R
Theorem	nfofr 6146	Hypothesis builder for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- F/_ x R   =>    |- F/_ x oR R
Theorem	offval 6147*	Value of an operation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = S   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( F ` x ) = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) -> ( G ` x ) = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. S |-> ( C R D ) ) )
Theorem	ofrfval 6148*	Value of a relation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = S   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( F ` x ) = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) -> ( G ` x ) = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oR R G <-> A. x e. S C R D ) )
Theorem	ofvalg 6149	Evaluate a function operation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = S   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( F ` X ) = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. B ) -> ( G ` X ) = D )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. S ) -> ( C R D ) e. U )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. S ) -> ( ( F oF R G ) ` X ) = ( C R D ) )
Theorem	ofrval 6150	Exhibit a function relation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = S   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( F ` X ) = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. B ) -> ( G ` X ) = D )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ F oR R G /\ X e. S ) -> C R D )
Theorem	ofmresval 6151	Value of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> F e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) G ) = ( F oF R G ) )
Theorem	off 6152*	The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. T ) ) -> ( x R y ) e. U )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : B --> T )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = C   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) : C --> U )
Theorem	offeq 6153*	Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. T ) ) -> ( x R y ) e. U )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : B --> T )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = C   &    |- ( ph -> H : C --> U )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( F ` x ) = D )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) -> ( G ` x ) = E )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. C ) -> ( D R E ) = ( H ` x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) = H )
Theorem	ofres 6154	Restrict the operands of a function operation to the same domain as that of the operation itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn B )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = C   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) = ( ( F |` C ) oF R ( G |` C ) ) )
Theorem	offval2 6155*	The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( x e. A |-> B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> G = ( x e. A |-> C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. A |-> ( B R C ) ) )
Theorem	ofrfval2 6156*	The function relation acting on maps. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( x e. A |-> B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> G = ( x e. A |-> C ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oR R G <-> A. x e. A B R C ) )
Theorem	suppssof1 6157*	Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)
|- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )   &    |- ( ph -> A : D --> V )   &    |- ( ph -> B : D --> R )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
Theorem	ofco 6158	The composition of a function operation with another function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn B )   &    |- ( ph -> H : D --> C )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. X )   &    |- ( A i^i B ) = C   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( F oF R G ) o. H ) = ( ( F o. H ) oF R ( G o. H ) ) )
Theorem	offveqb 6159*	Equivalent expressions for equality with a function operation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> H Fn A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( F ` x ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( G ` x ) = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( H = ( F oF R G ) <-> A. x e. A ( H ` x ) = ( B R C ) ) )
Theorem	offveq 6160*	Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> G Fn A )   &    |- ( ph -> H Fn A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( F ` x ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( G ` x ) = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( B R C ) = ( H ` x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) = H )
Theorem	ofc1g 6161	Left operation by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( F ` X ) = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( B R C ) e. U )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R F ) ` X ) = ( B R C ) )
Theorem	ofc2g 6162	Right operation by a constant. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> F Fn A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( F ` X ) = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( C R B ) e. U )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. A ) -> ( ( F oF R ( A X. { B } ) ) ` X ) = ( C R B ) )
Theorem	ofc12 6163	Function operation on two constant functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. X )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R ( A X. { C } ) ) = ( A X. { ( B R C ) } ) )
Theorem	caofref 6164*	Transfer a reflexive law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> x R x )   =>    |- ( ph -> F oR R F )
Theorem	caofinvl 6165*	Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> N : S --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G = ( v e. A |-> ( N ` ( F ` v ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( ( N ` x ) R x ) = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G oF R F ) = ( A X. { B } ) )
Theorem	caofid0l 6166*	Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( B R x ) = x )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R F ) = F )
Theorem	caofid0r 6167*	Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( x R B ) = x )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R ( A X. { B } ) ) = F )
Theorem	caofid1 6168*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( x R B ) = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R ( A X. { B } ) ) = ( A X. { C } ) )
Theorem	caofid2 6169*	Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. X )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. S ) -> ( B R x ) = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A X. { B } ) oF R F ) = ( A X. { C } ) )
Theorem	caofcom 6170*	Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x R y ) = ( y R x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF R G ) = ( G oF R F ) )
Theorem	caofrss 6171*	Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x R y -> x T y ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oR R G -> F oR T G ) )
Theorem	caoftrn 6172*	Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> H : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x R y /\ y T z ) -> x U z ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( F oR R G /\ G oR T H ) -> F oR U H ) )
Theorem	caofdig 6173*	Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : A --> K )   &    |- ( ph -> G : A --> S )   &    |- ( ph -> H : A --> S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x R y ) e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. K /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x T y ) e. W )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. K /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( x T ( y R z ) ) = ( ( x T y ) O ( x T z ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F oF T ( G oF R H ) ) = ( ( F oF T G ) oF O ( F oF T H ) ) )
2.6.14  Functions (continued)
Theorem	resfunexgALT 6174	The restriction of a function to a set exists. Compare Proposition 6.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This version has a shorter proof than resfunexg 5786 but requires ax-pow 4208 and ax-un 4469. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( Fun A /\ B e. C ) -> ( A |` B ) e. _V )
Theorem	cofunexg 6175	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( ( Fun A /\ B e. C ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	cofunex2g 6176	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ Fun `' B ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	fnexALT 6177	If the domain of a function is a set, the function is a set. Theorem 6.16(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 5343. This version of fnex 5787 uses ax-pow 4208 and ax-un 4469, whereas fnex 5787 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ A e. B ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	funexw 6178	Weak version of funex 5788 that holds without ax-coll 4149. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( Fun F /\ dom F e. B /\ ran F e. C ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mptexw 6179*	Weak version of mptex 5791 that holds without ax-coll 4149. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- A. x e. A B e. C   =>    |- ( x e. A |-> B ) e. _V
Theorem	funrnex 6180	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 5788. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
|- ( dom F e. B -> ( Fun F -> ran F e. _V ) )
Theorem	focdmex 6181	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A e. C -> ( F : A -onto-> B -> B e. _V ) )
Theorem	f1dmex 6182	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This can be thought of as a form of the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex 6183*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be thought of as B ( x ). This simple-looking theorem is actually quite powerful and appears to involve the Axiom of Replacement in an intrinsic way, as can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 5790, funex 5788, fnex 5787, resfunexg 5786, and funimaexg 5343. See also abrexex2 6190. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V
Theorem	abrexexg 6184*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. The antecedent assures us that A is a set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V )
Theorem	iunexg 6185*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A B e. W ) -> U_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex2g 6186*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A { y | ph } e. W ) -> { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3d 6187*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> { y | ps } e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3 6188*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> { y | ph } e. _V )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	iunex 6189*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be read informally as B ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- U_ x e. A B e. _V
Theorem	abrexex2 6190*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph is normally has free-variable parameters x and y. See also abrexex 6183. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	abexssex 6191*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both x and y can be free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ( x C_ A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	abexex 6192*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> x e. A )   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ph } e. _V
Theorem	oprabexd 6193*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> E* z ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> F e. _V )
Theorem	oprabex 6194*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> E* z ph )   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabex3 6195*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- H e. _V   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( H X. H ) /\ y e. ( H X. H ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = R ) ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 6196*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. w e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex 6197*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables x and y are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for C, which can be thought of as C ( x , y ). See comments for abrexex 6183. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B z = C } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 6198*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph normally has free-variable parameters x, y, and z. Compare abrexex2 6190. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- { z | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B ph } e. _V
Theorem	xpexgALT 6199	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4778 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	offval3 6200*	General value of ( F oF R G ) with no assumptions on functionality of F and G. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. ( dom F i^i dom G ) |-> ( ( F ` x ) R ( G ` x ) ) ) )