P. 62 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6101-6200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	opabex3 6101*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> { y | ph } e. _V )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	iunex 6102*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be read informally as B ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- U_ x e. A B e. _V
Theorem	abrexex2 6103*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph is normally has free-variable parameters x and y. See also abrexex 6096. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	abexssex 6104*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both x and y can be free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ( x C_ A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	abexex 6105*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> x e. A )   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ph } e. _V
Theorem	oprabexd 6106*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> E* z ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> F e. _V )
Theorem	oprabex 6107*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> E* z ph )   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabex3 6108*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- H e. _V   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( H X. H ) /\ y e. ( H X. H ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = R ) ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 6109*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. w e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex 6110*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables x and y are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for C, which can be thought of as C ( x , y ). See comments for abrexex 6096. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B z = C } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 6111*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph normally has free-variable parameters x, y, and z. Compare abrexex2 6103. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- { z | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B ph } e. _V
Theorem	xpexgALT 6112	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4725 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	offval3 6113*	General value of ( F oF R G ) with no assumptions on functionality of F and G. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. ( dom F i^i dom G ) |-> ( ( F ` x ) R ( G ` x ) ) ) )
Theorem	offres 6114	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( ( F oF R G ) |` D ) = ( ( F |` D ) oF R ( G |` D ) ) )
Theorem	ofmres 6115*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike oF R which is a proper class, ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) can be a set by ofmresex 6116, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 6072, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for oF R to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( f e. A , g e. B |-> ( f oF R g ) )
Theorem	ofmresex 6116	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) e. _V )
2.6.15  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 6117	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st
Syntax	c2nd 6118	Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function.
class 2nd
Definition	df-1st 6119	Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 6125 proves that it does this. For example, ( 1st ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 3 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 5092 and op1stb 4463). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 1st = ( x e. _V |-> U. dom { x } )
Definition	df-2nd 6120	Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 6126 proves that it does this. For example, ( 2nd ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 4 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 5095 and op2ndb 5094). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 2nd = ( x e. _V |-> U. ran { x } )
Theorem	1stvalg 6121	The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
Theorem	2ndvalg 6122	The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
Theorem	1st0 6123	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 1st ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	2nd0 6124	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 2nd ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	op1st 6125	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A
Theorem	op2nd 6126	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B
Theorem	op1std 6127	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 1st ` C ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndd 6128	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 2nd ` C ) = B )
Theorem	op1stg 6129	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndg 6130	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B )
Theorem	ot1stg 6131	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 6131, ot2ndg 6132, ot3rdgg 6133.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 1st ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = A )
Theorem	ot2ndg 6132	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6131 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = B )
Theorem	ot3rdgg 6133	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6131 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B , C >. ) = C )
Theorem	1stval2 6134	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 1st ` A ) = |^| |^| A )
Theorem	2ndval2 6135	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) = |^| |^| |^| `' { A } )
Theorem	fo1st 6136	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 1st : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	fo2nd 6137	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 2nd : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	f1stres 6138	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> A
Theorem	f2ndres 6139	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> B
Theorem	fo1stresm 6140*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. y y e. B -> ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> A )
Theorem	fo2ndresm 6141*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> B )
Theorem	1stcof 6142	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st o. F ) : A --> B )
Theorem	2ndcof 6143	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd o. F ) : A --> C )
Theorem	xp1st 6144	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. B )
Theorem	xp2nd 6145	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. C )
Theorem	1stexg 6146	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 1st ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	2ndexg 6147	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	elxp6 6148	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5098. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp7 6149	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5098. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	oprssdmm 6150*	Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ u e. S ) -> E. v v e. u )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> Rel F )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( S X. S ) C_ dom F )
Theorem	eqopi 6151	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ( V X. W ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) -> A = <. B , C >. )
Theorem	xp2 6152*	Representation of cross product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { x e. ( _V X. _V ) | ( ( 1st ` x ) e. A /\ ( 2nd ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	unielxp 6153	The membership relation for a cross product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. A e. U. ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	1st2nd2 6154	Reconstruction of a member of a cross product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	xpopth 6155	An ordered pair theorem for members of cross products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. ( C X. D ) /\ B e. ( R X. S ) ) -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) = ( 1st ` B ) /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = ( 2nd ` B ) ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	eqop 6156	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	eqop2 6157	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	op1steq 6158*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B <-> E. x A = <. B , x >. ) )
Theorem	2nd1st 6159	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. `' { A } = <. ( 2nd ` A ) , ( 1st ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1st2nd 6160	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1stdm 6161	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. dom R )
Theorem	2ndrn 6162	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. ran R )
Theorem	1st2ndbr 6163	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> ( 1st ` A ) B ( 2nd ` A ) )
Theorem	releldm2 6164*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( B e. dom A <-> E. x e. A ( 1st ` x ) = B ) )
Theorem	reldm 6165*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> dom A = ran ( x e. A |-> ( 1st ` x ) ) )
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 6166	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog of sbceq1a 2964 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4229). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` A ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	csbopeq1a 6167	Equality theorem for substitution of a class A for an ordered pair <. x , y >. in B (analog of csbeq1a 3058). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> [_ ( 1st ` A ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]_ B = B )
Theorem	dfopab2 6168*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph }
Theorem	dfoprab3s 6169*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
Theorem	dfoprab3 6170*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }
Theorem	dfoprab4 6171*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfoprab4f 6172*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfxp3 6173*	Define the cross product of three classes. Compare df-xp 4617. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
|- ( ( A X. B ) X. C ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) }
Theorem	elopabi 6174*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` A ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. x , y >. | ph } -> ch )
Theorem	eloprabi 6175*	A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } -> th )
Theorem	mpomptsx 6176*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	mpompts 6177*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. ( A X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	dmmpossx 6178*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- dom F C_ U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B )
Theorem	fmpox 6179*	Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where B ( x ) is not constant but depends on x. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fmpo 6180*	Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : ( A X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fnmpo 6181*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> F Fn ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	mpofvex 6182*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x A. y C e. V /\ R e. W /\ S e. X ) -> ( R F S ) e. _V )
Theorem	fnmpoi 6183*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- F Fn ( A X. B )
Theorem	dmmpo 6184*	Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- dom F = ( A X. B )
Theorem	mpofvexi 6185*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   &    |- S e. _V   =>    |- ( R F S ) e. _V
Theorem	ovmpoelrn 6186*	An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
|- O = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. M /\ X e. A /\ Y e. B ) -> ( X O Y ) e. M )
Theorem	dmmpoga 6187*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6184. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	dmmpog 6188*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6184. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	mpoexxg 6189*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ A. x e. A B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexg 6190*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexga 6191*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V )
Theorem	mpoexw 6192*	Weak version of mpoex 6193 that holds without ax-coll 4104. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- D e. _V   &    |- A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D   =>    |- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V
Theorem	mpoex 6193*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) e. _V
Theorem	fnmpoovd 6194*	A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> M Fn ( A X. B ) )   &    |- ( ( i = a /\ j = b ) -> D = C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ i e. A /\ j e. B ) -> D e. U )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ a e. A /\ b e. B ) -> C e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( M = ( a e. A , b e. B |-> C ) <-> A. i e. A A. j e. B ( i M j ) = D ) )
Theorem	fmpoco 6195*	Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5662 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> R e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> R ) )   &    |- ( ph -> G = ( z e. C |-> S ) )   &    |- ( z = R -> S = T )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G o. F ) = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> T ) )
Theorem	oprabco 6196*	Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. D )   &    |- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- G = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> ( H ` C ) )   =>    |- ( H Fn D -> G = ( H o. F ) )
Theorem	oprab2co 6197*	Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.)
|- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. R )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> D e. S )   &    |- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> <. C , D >. )   &    |- G = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> ( C M D ) )   =>    |- ( M Fn ( R X. S ) -> G = ( M o. F ) )
Theorem	df1st2 6198*	An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | z = x } = ( 1st |` ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	df2nd2 6199*	An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | z = y } = ( 2nd |` ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	1stconst 6200	The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( 1st |` ( A X. { B } ) ) : ( A X. { B } ) -1-1-onto-> A )