Theorem ordpwsucexmid 4547

Description: The subset in ordpwsucss 4544 cannot be equality. That is, strengthening it to equality implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid.1	|- A. x e. On suc x = ( ~P x i^i On )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid	|- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x

Proof of Theorem ordpwsucexmid

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0elpw 4143	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph }
2		0elon 4370	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. On
3		elin 3305	. . . . 5 |- ( (/) e. ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) <-> ( (/) e. ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } /\ (/) e. On ) )
4	1, 2, 3	mpbir2an 932	. . . 4 |- (/) e. ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On )
5		ordtriexmidlem 4496	. . . . 5 |- { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. On
6		suceq 4380	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> suc x = suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
7		pweq 3562	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ~P x = ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
8	7	ineq1d 3322	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( ~P x i^i On ) = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) )
9	6, 8	eqeq12d 2180	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( suc x = ( ~P x i^i On ) <-> suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) ) )
10		ordpwsucexmid.1	. . . . . 6 |- A. x e. On suc x = ( ~P x i^i On )
11	9, 10	vtoclri 2801	. . . . 5 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. On -> suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) )
12	5, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 |- suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On )
13	4, 12	eleqtrri 2242	. . 3 |- (/) e. suc { z e. { (/) } | ph }
14		elsuci 4381	. . 3 |- ( (/) e. suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } \/ (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } \/ (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
16		0ex 4109	. . . . . 6 |- (/) e. _V
17	16	snid 3607	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. { (/) }
18		biidd 171	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = (/) -> ( ph <-> ph ) )
19	18	elrab3 2883	. . . . 5 |- ( (/) e. { (/) } -> ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ph ) )
20	17, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ph )
21	20	biimpi 119	. . 3 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ph )
22		ordtriexmidlem2 4497	. . . 4 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) -> -. ph )
23	22	eqcoms 2168	. . 3 |- ( (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> -. ph )
24	21, 23	orim12i 749	. 2 |- ( ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } \/ (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
25	15, 24	ax-mp 5	1 |- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   <-> wb 104   \/ wo 698   = wceq 1343   e. wcel 2136   A.wral 2444   {crab 2448   i^i cin 3115   (/)c0 3409   ~Pcpw 3559   {csn 3576   Oncon0 4341   suc csuc 4343

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-nul 4108  ax-pow 4153

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-nul 3410  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-uni 3790  df-tr 4081  df-iord 4344  df-on 4346  df-suc 4349

This theorem is referenced by: (None)