Theorem ordpwsucexmid 4493

Description: The subset in ordpwsucss 4490 cannot be equality. That is, strengthening it to equality implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid.1	|- A. x e. On suc x = ( ~P x i^i On )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid	|- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Distinct variable group:   ph, x

Proof of Theorem ordpwsucexmid

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0elpw 4096	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph }
2		0elon 4322	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. On
3		elin 3264	. . . . 5 |- ( (/) e. ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) <-> ( (/) e. ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } /\ (/) e. On ) )
4	1, 2, 3	mpbir2an 927	. . . 4 |- (/) e. ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On )
5		ordtriexmidlem 4443	. . . . 5 |- { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. On
6		suceq 4332	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> suc x = suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
7		pweq 3518	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ~P x = ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
8	7	ineq1d 3281	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( ~P x i^i On ) = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) )
9	6, 8	eqeq12d 2155	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( suc x = ( ~P x i^i On ) <-> suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) ) )
10		ordpwsucexmid.1	. . . . . 6 |- A. x e. On suc x = ( ~P x i^i On )
11	9, 10	vtoclri 2764	. . . . 5 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. On -> suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On ) )
12	5, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 |- suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } = ( ~P { z e. { (/) } | ph } i^i On )
13	4, 12	eleqtrri 2216	. . 3 |- (/) e. suc { z e. { (/) } | ph }
14		elsuci 4333	. . 3 |- ( (/) e. suc { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } \/ (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } \/ (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
16		0ex 4063	. . . . . 6 |- (/) e. _V
17	16	snid 3563	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. { (/) }
18		biidd 171	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = (/) -> ( ph <-> ph ) )
19	18	elrab3 2845	. . . . 5 |- ( (/) e. { (/) } -> ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ph ) )
20	17, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ph )
21	20	biimpi 119	. . 3 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ph )
22		ordtriexmidlem2 4444	. . . 4 |- ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } = (/) -> -. ph )
23	22	eqcoms 2143	. . 3 |- ( (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> -. ph )
24	21, 23	orim12i 749	. 2 |- ( ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } \/ (/) = { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) -> ( ph \/ -. ph ) )
25	15, 24	ax-mp 5	1 |- ( ph \/ -. ph )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   <-> wb 104   \/ wo 698   = wceq 1332   e. wcel 1481   A.wral 2417   {crab 2421   i^i cin 3075   (/)c0 3368   ~Pcpw 3515   {csn 3532   Oncon0 4293   suc csuc 4295

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-sep 4054  ax-nul 4062  ax-pow 4106

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-rab 2426  df-v 2691  df-dif 3078  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-nul 3369  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-uni 3745  df-tr 4035  df-iord 4296  df-on 4298  df-suc 4301

This theorem is referenced by: (None)