Theorem ordpwsucexmid 4606

Description: The subset in ordpwsucss 4603 cannot be equality. That is, strengthening it to equality implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid.1	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Proof of Theorem ordpwsucexmid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0elpw 4197	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
2		0elon 4427	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
3		elin 3346	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On) ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∅ ∈ On))
4	1, 2, 3	mpbir2an 944	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)
5		ordtriexmidlem 4555	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On
6		suceq 4437	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑥 = suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
7		pweq 3608	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝒫 𝑥 = 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
8	7	ineq1d 3363	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On) = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On))
9	6, 8	eqeq12d 2211	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On) ↔ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)))
10		ordpwsucexmid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On)
11	9, 10	vtoclri 2839	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On → suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On))
12	5, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)
13	4, 12	eleqtrri 2272	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
14		elsuci 4438	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
16		0ex 4160	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
17	16	snid 3653	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
18		biidd 172	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
19	18	elrab3 2921	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {∅} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
20	17, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
21	20	biimpi 120	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
22		ordtriexmidlem2 4556	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ → ¬ 𝜑)
23	22	eqcoms 2199	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝜑)
24	21, 23	orim12i 760	. 2 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
25	15, 24	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 709   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167  ∀wral 2475  {crab 2479   ∩ cin 3156  ∅c0 3450  𝒫 cpw 3605  {csn 3622  Oncon0 4398  suc csuc 4400

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4151  ax-nul 4159  ax-pow 4207

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-dif 3159  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-nul 3451  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-uni 3840  df-tr 4132  df-iord 4401  df-on 4403  df-suc 4406

This theorem is referenced by: (None)