Theorem ordpwsucexmid 4547

Description: The subset in ordpwsucss 4544 cannot be equality. That is, strengthening it to equality implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid.1	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Proof of Theorem ordpwsucexmid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0elpw 4143	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
2		0elon 4370	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
3		elin 3305	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On) ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∅ ∈ On))
4	1, 2, 3	mpbir2an 932	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)
5		ordtriexmidlem 4496	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On
6		suceq 4380	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑥 = suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
7		pweq 3562	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝒫 𝑥 = 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
8	7	ineq1d 3322	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On) = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On))
9	6, 8	eqeq12d 2180	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On) ↔ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)))
10		ordpwsucexmid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On)
11	9, 10	vtoclri 2801	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On → suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On))
12	5, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)
13	4, 12	eleqtrri 2242	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
14		elsuci 4381	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
16		0ex 4109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
17	16	snid 3607	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
18		biidd 171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
19	18	elrab3 2883	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {∅} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
20	17, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
21	20	biimpi 119	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
22		ordtriexmidlem2 4497	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ → ¬ 𝜑)
23	22	eqcoms 2168	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝜑)
24	21, 23	orim12i 749	. 2 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
25	15, 24	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 698   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  ∀wral 2444  {crab 2448   ∩ cin 3115  ∅c0 3409  𝒫 cpw 3559  {csn 3576  Oncon0 4341  suc csuc 4343

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-nul 4108  ax-pow 4153

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-nul 3410  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-uni 3790  df-tr 4081  df-iord 4344  df-on 4346  df-suc 4349

This theorem is referenced by: (None)