ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  0xp GIF version

Theorem 0xp 4691
Description: The cross product with the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.13(ii) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
0xp (∅ × 𝐴) = ∅

Proof of Theorem 0xp
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 elxp 4628 . . 3 (𝑧 ∈ (∅ × 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴)))
2 noel 3418 . . . . . . 7 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅
3 simprl 526 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ∅)
42, 3mto 657 . . . . . 6 ¬ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴))
54nex 1493 . . . . 5 ¬ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴))
65nex 1493 . . . 4 ¬ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴))
7 noel 3418 . . . 4 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ ∅
86, 72false 696 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ 𝑦𝐴)) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ ∅)
91, 8bitri 183 . 2 (𝑧 ∈ (∅ × 𝐴) ↔ 𝑧 ∈ ∅)
109eqriv 2167 1 (∅ × 𝐴) = ∅
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 103   = wceq 1348  wex 1485  wcel 2141  c0 3414  cop 3586   × cxp 4609
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-14 2144  ax-ext 2152  ax-sep 4107  ax-pow 4160  ax-pr 4194
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 975  df-tru 1351  df-fal 1354  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-v 2732  df-dif 3123  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134  df-nul 3415  df-pw 3568  df-sn 3589  df-pr 3590  df-op 3592  df-opab 4051  df-xp 4617
This theorem is referenced by:  res0  4895  xp0  5030  xpeq0r  5033  xpdisj1  5035  xpima1  5057  xpfi  6907  exmidfodomrlemim  7178  hashxp  10761
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator