| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ssoprab2b | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2b 4414. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ssoprab2b | ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfoprab1 6127 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 2 | nfoprab1 6127 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | nfss 3241 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| 4 | nfoprab2 6128 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 5 | nfoprab2 6128 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | nfss 3241 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| 7 | nfoprab3 6129 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 8 | nfoprab3 6129 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | nfss 3241 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| 10 | ssel 3242 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → (〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} → 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓})) | |
| 11 | oprabid 6107 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 12 | oprabid 6107 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜓) | |
| 13 | 10, 11, 12 | 3imtr3g 204 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 14 | 9, 13 | alrimi 1575 | . . . 4 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → ∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 15 | 6, 14 | alrimi 1575 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → ∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 16 | 3, 15 | alrimi 1575 | . 2 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 17 | ssoprab2 6134 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | |
| 18 | 16, 17 | impbii 126 | 1 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1400 ∈ wcel 2209 ⊆ wss 3220 〈cop 3708 {coprab 6076 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 623 ax-in2 624 ax-io 721 ax-5 1500 ax-7 1501 ax-gen 1502 ax-ie1 1546 ax-ie2 1547 ax-8 1557 ax-10 1558 ax-11 1559 ax-i12 1560 ax-bndl 1562 ax-4 1563 ax-17 1579 ax-i9 1583 ax-ial 1587 ax-i5r 1588 ax-14 2212 ax-ext 2220 ax-sep 4244 ax-pow 4306 ax-pr 4341 ax-setind 4679 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1011 df-tru 1405 df-fal 1408 df-nf 1514 df-sb 1816 df-eu 2089 df-mo 2090 df-clab 2225 df-cleq 2231 df-clel 2234 df-nfc 2381 df-ne 2421 df-ral 2533 df-v 2823 df-dif 3222 df-un 3224 df-in 3226 df-ss 3233 df-pw 3687 df-sn 3711 df-pr 3712 df-op 3714 df-oprab 6079 |
| This theorem is referenced by: eqoprab2b 6136 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |