| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ssoprab2b | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2b 4331. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ssoprab2b | ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nfoprab1 6007 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 2 | nfoprab1 6007 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | nfss 3190 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| 4 | nfoprab2 6008 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 5 | nfoprab2 6008 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | nfss 3190 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| 7 | nfoprab3 6009 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | |
| 8 | nfoprab3 6009 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | nfss 3190 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| 10 | ssel 3191 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → (〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} → 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓})) | |
| 11 | oprabid 5989 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
| 12 | oprabid 5989 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜓) | |
| 13 | 10, 11, 12 | 3imtr3g 204 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 14 | 9, 13 | alrimi 1546 | . . . 4 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → ∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 15 | 6, 14 | alrimi 1546 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → ∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 16 | 3, 15 | alrimi 1546 | . 2 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} → ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| 17 | ssoprab2 6014 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓}) | |
| 18 | 16, 17 | impbii 126 | 1 ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1371 ∈ wcel 2177 ⊆ wss 3170 〈cop 3641 {coprab 5958 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 615 ax-in2 616 ax-io 711 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-10 1529 ax-11 1530 ax-i12 1531 ax-bndl 1533 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-14 2180 ax-ext 2188 ax-sep 4170 ax-pow 4226 ax-pr 4261 ax-setind 4593 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 983 df-tru 1376 df-fal 1379 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-eu 2058 df-mo 2059 df-clab 2193 df-cleq 2199 df-clel 2202 df-nfc 2338 df-ne 2378 df-ral 2490 df-v 2775 df-dif 3172 df-un 3174 df-in 3176 df-ss 3183 df-pw 3623 df-sn 3644 df-pr 3645 df-op 3647 df-oprab 5961 |
| This theorem is referenced by: eqoprab2b 6016 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |