![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > tz7.2 | GIF version |
Description: Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, of except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to antecedent E Fr 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tz7.2 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | trss 3945 | . . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | |
2 | efrirr 4180 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | |
3 | eleq1 2150 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
4 | 3 | notbid 627 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) |
5 | 2, 4 | syl5ibrcom 155 | . . . 4 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) |
6 | 5 | necon2ad 2312 | . . 3 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)) |
7 | 1, 6 | anim12ii 335 | . 2 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))) |
8 | 7 | 3impia 1140 | 1 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ∧ w3a 924 = wceq 1289 ∈ wcel 1438 ≠ wne 2255 ⊆ wss 2999 Tr wtr 3936 E cep 4114 Fr wfr 4155 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 579 ax-in2 580 ax-io 665 ax-5 1381 ax-7 1382 ax-gen 1383 ax-ie1 1427 ax-ie2 1428 ax-8 1440 ax-10 1441 ax-11 1442 ax-i12 1443 ax-bndl 1444 ax-4 1445 ax-14 1450 ax-17 1464 ax-i9 1468 ax-ial 1472 ax-i5r 1473 ax-ext 2070 ax-sep 3957 ax-pow 4009 ax-pr 4036 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-3an 926 df-tru 1292 df-nf 1395 df-sb 1693 df-eu 1951 df-mo 1952 df-clab 2075 df-cleq 2081 df-clel 2084 df-nfc 2217 df-ne 2256 df-ral 2364 df-v 2621 df-dif 3001 df-un 3003 df-in 3005 df-ss 3012 df-pw 3431 df-sn 3452 df-pr 3453 df-op 3455 df-uni 3654 df-br 3846 df-opab 3900 df-tr 3937 df-eprel 4116 df-frfor 4158 df-frind 4159 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |