Theorem ismnddef 18663

Description: The predicate "is a monoid", corresponding 1-to-1 to the definition. (Contributed by FL, 2-Nov-2009.) (Revised by AV, 1-Feb-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismnddef.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
ismnddef.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ismnddef	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐵,𝑎,𝑒   + ,𝑎,𝑒

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐺(𝑒,𝑎)

Proof of Theorem ismnddef

Dummy variables 𝑏 𝑔 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvex 6871	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝑔) ∈ V
2		fvex 6871	. . 3 ⊢ (+g‘𝑔) ∈ V
3		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑔) = (Base‘𝐺))
4		ismnddef.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑔) = 𝐵)
6	5	eqeq2d 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑏 = (Base‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑏 = 𝐵))
7		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (+g‘𝑔) = (+g‘𝐺))
8		ismnddef.p	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
9	7, 8	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (+g‘𝑔) = + )
10	9	eqeq2d 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑝 = (+g‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑝 = + ))
11	6, 10	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ((𝑏 = (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝 = (+g‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑝 = + )))
12		simpl 482	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑝 = + ) → 𝑏 = 𝐵)
13		oveq 7393	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = + → (𝑒𝑝𝑎) = (𝑒 + 𝑎))
14	13	eqeq1d 2731	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = + → ((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ↔ (𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎))
15		oveq 7393	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = + → (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = (𝑎 + 𝑒))
16	15	eqeq1d 2731	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = + → ((𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎 ↔ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎))
17	14, 16	anbi12d 632	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = + → (((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎) ↔ ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎)))
18	17	adantl 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑝 = + ) → (((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎) ↔ ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎)))
19	12, 18	raleqbidv 3319	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑝 = + ) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎)))
20	12, 19	rexeqbidv 3320	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑝 = + ) → (∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎)))
21	11, 20	biimtrdi 253	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ((𝑏 = (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝 = (+g‘𝑔)) → (∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎))))
22	1, 2, 21	sbc2iedv 3830	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ([(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑏][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑝]∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎)))
23		df-mnd 18662	. 2 ⊢ Mnd = {𝑔 ∈ Smgrp ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑏][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑝]∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ((𝑒𝑝𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎𝑝𝑒) = 𝑎)}
24	22, 23	elrab2 3662	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Mnd ↔ (𝐺 ∈ Smgrp ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑒 + 𝑎) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 + 𝑒) = 𝑎)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044  ∃wrex 3053  [wsbc 3753  ‘cfv 6511  (class class class)co 7387  Basecbs 17179  +_gcplusg 17220  Smgrpcsgrp 18645  Mndcmnd 18661

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2701  ax-nul 5261

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-iota 6464  df-fv 6519  df-ov 7390  df-mnd 18662

This theorem is referenced by:  ismnd  18664  isnmnd  18665  sgrpidmnd  18666  mndsgrp  18667  mnd1  18706  efmndmnd  18816  smndex1mnd  18837  isringrng  20196  2zrngamnd  48235