P. 187 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 18601-18700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ipolt 18601	Strict order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊊ 𝑌))
Theorem	ipopos 18602	The inclusion poset on a family of sets is actually a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ Poset
Theorem	isipodrs 18603*	Condition for a family of sets to be directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑧))
Theorem	ipodrscl 18604	Direction by inclusion as used here implies sethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	ipodrsfi 18605*	Finite upper bound property for directed collections of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧)
Theorem	fpwipodrs 18606	The finite subsets of any set are directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (toInc‘(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) ∈ Dirset)
Theorem	ipodrsima 18607*	The monotone image of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑢) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑣))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘𝐵) ∈ Dirset)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘(𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ∈ Dirset)
Theorem	isacs3lem 18608*	An algebraic closure system satisfies isacs3 18616. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	acsdrsel 18609	An algebraic closure system contains all directed unions of closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	isacs4lem 18610*	In a closure system in which directed unions of closed sets are closed, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))))
Theorem	isacs5lem 18611*	If closure commutes with directed unions, then the closure of a set is the closure of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin))))
Theorem	acsdrscl 18612	In an algebraic closure system, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑌) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑌))
Theorem	acsficl 18613	A closure in an algebraic closure system is the union of the closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)))
Theorem	isacs5 18614*	A closure system is algebraic iff the closure of a generating set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin))))
Theorem	isacs4 18615*	A closure system is algebraic iff closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑠))))
Theorem	isacs3 18616*	A closure system is algebraic iff directed unions of closed sets are closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	acsficld 18617	In an algebraic closure system, the closure of a set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. Deduction form of acsficl 18613. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝑁 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)))
Theorem	acsficl2d 18618*	In an algebraic closure system, an element is in the closure of a set if and only if it is in the closure of a finite subset. Alternate form of acsficl 18613. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑥)))
Theorem	acsfiindd 18619	In an algebraic closure system, a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are independent. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝐼))
Theorem	acsmapd 18620*	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑇 is contained in the closure of 𝑆, there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 contains 𝑇. This is proven by applying acsficl2d 18618 to each element of 𝑇. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘∪ ran 𝑓)))
Theorem	acsmap2d 18621*	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is independent, then there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that 𝑆 equals the union of ran 𝑓. This is proven by taking the map 𝑓 from acsmapd 18620 and observing that, since 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure, the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 must contain 𝑆. Since 𝑆 is independent, by mrissmrcd 17706, ∪ ran 𝑓 must equal 𝑆. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑆 = ∪ ran 𝑓))
Theorem	acsinfd 18622	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 is infinite. This follows from applying unirnffid 9306 to the map given in acsmap2d 18621. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	acsdomd 18623	In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This follows from applying acsinfd 18622 and then applying unirnfdomd 10562 to the map given in acsmap2d 18621. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇)
Theorem	acsinfdimd 18624	In an algebraic closure system, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is infinite, then they are equinumerous. This is proven by using acsdomd 18623 twice with acsinfd 18622. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
Theorem	acsexdimd 18625*	In an algebraic closure system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure, they are equinumerous. See mreexfidimd 17716 for the finite case and acsinfdimd 18624 for the infinite case. This is a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
Theorem	mrelatglb 18626	Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) See mrelatglbALT 49806 for an alternate proof.
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈)
Theorem	mrelatglb0 18627	The empty intersection in a Moore space is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	mrelatlub 18628	Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) See mrelatlubALT 49805 for an alternate proof.
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈))
Theorem	mreclatBAD 18629*	A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 7373 update): Reprove using isclat 18566 instead of the isclatBAD. hypothesis. See commented-out mreclat above. See mreclat 49807 for a good version.
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐼 ∈ Poset ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ (Base‘𝐼) → (((lub‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼) ∧ ((glb‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat)
9.6  Posets, directed sets, and lattices as relations
9.6.1  Posets and lattices as relations See commented-out notes for lattices as relations.
Syntax	cps 18630	Extend class notation with the class of all posets.
class PosetRel
Syntax	ctsr 18631	Extend class notation with the class of all totally ordered sets.
class TosetRel
Definition	df-ps 18632	Define the class of all posets (partially ordered sets) with weak ordering (e.g., "less than or equal to" instead of "less than"). A poset is a relation which is transitive, reflexive, and antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.)
⊢ PosetRel = {𝑟 ∣ (Rel 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∩ ◡𝑟) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟))}
Definition	df-tsr 18633	Define the class of all totally ordered sets. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.)
⊢ TosetRel = {𝑟 ∈ PosetRel ∣ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟) ⊆ (𝑟 ∪ ◡𝑟)}
Theorem	isps 18634	The predicate "is a poset" i.e. a transitive, reflexive, antisymmetric relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ (Rel 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅))))
Theorem	psrel 18635	A poset is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ PosetRel → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	psref2 18636	A poset is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅))
Theorem	pstr2 18637	A poset is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅)
Theorem	pslem 18638	Lemma for psref 18640 and others. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅 → 𝐴𝑅𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	psdmrn 18639	The domain and range of a poset equal its field. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (dom 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅 ∧ ran 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅))
Theorem	psref 18640	A poset is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	psrn 18641	The range of a poset equals it domain. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑋 = ran 𝑅)
Theorem	psasym 18642	A poset is antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	pstr 18643	A poset is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	cnvps 18644	The converse of a poset is a poset. In the general case (◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑅 ∈ PosetRel) is not true. See cnvpsb 18645 for a special case where the property holds. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel)
Theorem	cnvpsb 18645	The converse of a poset is a poset. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel))
Theorem	psss 18646	Any subset of a partially ordered set is partially ordered. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ PosetRel)
Theorem	psssdm2 18647	Field of a subposet. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → dom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	psssdm 18648	Field of a subposet. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋) → dom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	istsr 18649	The predicate is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ (𝑋 × 𝑋) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅)))
Theorem	istsr2 18650*	The predicate is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	tsrlin 18651	A toset is a linear order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	tsrlemax 18652	Two ways of saying a number is less than or equal to the maximum of two others. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐶, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	tsrps 18653	A toset is a poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → 𝑅 ∈ PosetRel)
Theorem	cnvtsr 18654	The converse of a toset is a toset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → ◡𝑅 ∈ TosetRel )
Theorem	tsrss 18655	Any subset of a totally ordered set is totally ordered. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ TosetRel )
Theorem	ledm 18656	The domain of ≤ is ℝ*. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2015.)
⊢ ℝ* = dom ≤
Theorem	lern 18657	The range of ≤ is ℝ*. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ℝ* = ran ≤
Theorem	lefld 18658	The field of the 'less or equal to' relationship on the extended real. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2015.)
⊢ ℝ* = ∪ ∪ ≤
Theorem	letsr 18659	The "less than or equal to" relationship on the extended reals is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ≤ ∈ TosetRel
9.6.2  Directed sets, nets
Syntax	cdir 18660	Extend class notation with the class of directed sets.
class DirRel
Syntax	ctail 18661	Extend class notation with the tail function for directed sets.
class tail
Definition	df-dir 18662	Define the class of directed sets (the order relation itself is sometimes called a direction, and a directed set is a set equipped with a direction). (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.)
⊢ DirRel = {𝑟 ∣ ((Rel 𝑟 ∧ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟) ∧ ((𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (∪ ∪ 𝑟 × ∪ ∪ 𝑟) ⊆ (◡𝑟 ∘ 𝑟)))}
Definition	df-tail 18663*	Define the tail function for directed sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.)
⊢ tail = (𝑟 ∈ DirRel ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑟 ↦ (𝑟 “ {𝑥})))
Theorem	isdir 18664	A condition for a relation to be a direction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ DirRel ↔ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)))))
Theorem	reldir 18665	A direction is a relation. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DirRel → Rel 𝑅)
Theorem	dirdm 18666	A direction's domain is equal to its field. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DirRel → dom 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅)
Theorem	dirref 18667	A direction is reflexive. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	dirtr 18668	A direction is transitive. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	dirge 18669*	For any two elements of a directed set, there exists a third element greater than or equal to both. Note that this does not say that the two elements have a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	tsrdir 18670	A totally ordered set is a directed set. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ TosetRel → 𝐴 ∈ DirRel)
9.7  Chains
Syntax	cchn 18671	Extend class notation with the class of (finite) chains.
class ( < Chain 𝐴)
Definition	df-chn 18672*	Define the class of (finite) chains. A chain is defined to be a sequence of objects, where each object is less than the next one in the sequence. The term "chain" is usually used in order theory. In the context of algebra, chains are often called "towers", for example for fields, or "series", for example for subgroup or subnormal series. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ( < Chain 𝐴) = {𝑐 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ (dom 𝑐 ∖ {0})(𝑐‘(𝑛 − 1)) < (𝑐‘𝑛)}
Theorem	ischn 18673*	Property of being a chain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ (dom 𝐶 ∖ {0})(𝐶‘(𝑛 − 1)) < (𝐶‘𝑛)))
Theorem	chnwrd 18674	A chain is an ordered sequence, i.e. a word. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Word 𝐴)
Theorem	chnltm1 18675	Basic property of a chain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (dom 𝐶 ∖ {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘(𝑁 − 1)) < (𝐶‘𝑁))
Theorem	pfxchn 18676	A prefix of a chain is still a chain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 prefix 𝐿) ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	nfchnd 18677	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for chain collection constructor. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥( < Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	chneq1 18678	Equality theorem for chains. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 17-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ( < = 𝑅 → ( < Chain 𝐴) = (𝑅 Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	chneq2 18679	Equality theorem for chains. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 17-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( < Chain 𝐴) = ( < Chain 𝐵))
Theorem	chneq12 18680	Equality theorem for chains. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 17-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (( < = 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → ( < Chain 𝐴) = (𝑅 Chain 𝐵))
Theorem	chnrss 18681	Chains under a relation are also chains under any superset relation. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ( < ⊆ 𝑅 → ( < Chain 𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅 Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	chndss 18682	Chains with an alphabet are also chains with any superset alphabet. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( < Chain 𝐴) ⊆ ( < Chain 𝐵))
Theorem	chnrdss 18683	Subset theorem for chains. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (( < ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → ( < Chain 𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅 Chain 𝐵))
Theorem	chnexg 18684	Chains with a set given for range form a set. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 21-Nov-2024.) (Revised by Ender Ting, 17-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( < Chain 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	nulchn 18685	Empty set is an increasing chain for every range and every relation. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 19-Nov-2024.) (Revised by Ender Ting, 17-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴)
Theorem	s1chn 18686	A singleton word is always a chain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋”⟩ ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	chnind 18687*	Induction over a chain. See nnind 12261 for an explanation about the hypotheses. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝑐 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = (𝑑 ++ ⟨“𝑥”⟩) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑑 = ∅ ∨ (lastS‘𝑑) < 𝑥)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	chnub 18688	In a chain, the last element is an upper bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → < Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐶) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝐼) < (lastS‘𝐶))
Theorem	chnlt 18689	Compare any two elements in a chain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → < Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (0..^𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶‘𝐼) < (𝐶‘𝐽))
Theorem	chnso 18690	A chain induces a total order. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (( < Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴)) → < Or ran 𝐶)
Theorem	chnccats1 18691	Extend a chain with a single element. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 = ∅ ∨ (lastS‘𝑇) < 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	chnccat 18692	Concatenate two chains. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 = ∅ ∨ 𝑈 = ∅ ∨ (lastS‘𝑇) < (𝑈‘0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ++ 𝑈) ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	chnrev 18693	Reverse of a chain is chain under the converse relation and same domain. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴) → (reverse‘𝐵) ∈ (◡ < Chain 𝐴))
Theorem	chnflenfi 18694*	There is a finite number of chains with fixed length over finite alphabet. Trivially holds for invalid lengths as there're no matching sequences. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 5-Jan-2025.) (Revised by Ender Ting, 17-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → {𝑎 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴) ∣ (♯‘𝑎) = 𝑇} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	chnf 18695	A chain is a zero-based finite sequence with a recoverable upper limit. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴) → 𝐵:(0..^(♯‘𝐵))⟶𝐴)
Theorem	chnpof1 18696	A chain under relation which orders the alphabet is a one-to-one function from its domain to alphabet. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → < Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:(0..^(♯‘𝐵))–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	chnpoadomd 18697	A chain under relation which orders the alphabet cannot have more elements than the alphabet itself. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → < Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0..^(♯‘𝐵)) ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	chnpolleha 18698	A chain under relation which orders the alphabet has at most alphabet's size elements in it. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → < Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐵) ≤ (♯‘𝐴))
Theorem	chnpolfz 18699	Provided that chain's relation is a partial order, the chain length is restricted to a specific integer range. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → < Po 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐵) ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐴)))
Theorem	chnfi 18700	There is a finite number of chains over finite domain, as long as the relation orders it. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 20-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ < Po 𝐴) → ( < Chain 𝐴) ∈ Fin)