| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 187 of 509) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31407) |
(31408-32930) |
(32931-50831) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | oduclatb 18601 | Being a complete lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ CLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ CLat) | ||
| Theorem | clatl 18602 | A complete lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) TODO: use eqrelrdv2 5779 to shorten proof and eliminate joindmss 18471 and meetdmss 18485? |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
| Theorem | isglbd 18603* | Properties that determine the greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐻 ≤ 𝑦) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ CLat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | lublem 18604* | Lemma for the least upper bound properties in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | lubub 18605 | The LUB of a complete lattice subset is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | lubl 18606* | The LUB of a complete lattice subset is the least bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lubss 18607 | Subset law for least upper bounds. (chsupss 31831 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑈‘𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | lubel 18608 | An element of a set is less than or equal to the least upper bound of the set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | lubun 18609 | The LUB of a union. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘(𝑆 ∪ 𝑇)) = ((𝑈‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑈‘𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | clatglb 18610* | Properties of greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆)))) | ||
| Theorem | clatglble 18611 | The greatest lower bound is the least element. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | clatleglb 18612* | Two ways of expressing "less than or equal to the greatest lower bound." (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | clatglbss 18613 | Subset law for greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝐺‘𝑇) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆)) | ||
| Syntax | cdlat 18614 | The class of distributive lattices. |
| class DLat | ||
| Definition | df-dlat 18615* | A distributive lattice is a lattice in which meets distribute over joins, or equivalently (latdisd 18591) joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ DLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ [(Base‘𝑘) / 𝑏][(join‘𝑘) / 𝑗][(meet‘𝑘) / 𝑚]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑚(𝑦𝑗𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑚𝑦)𝑗(𝑥𝑚𝑧))} | ||
| Theorem | isdlat 18616* | Property of being a distributive lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | dlatmjdi 18617 | In a distributive lattice, meets distribute over joins. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | dlatl 18618 | A distributive lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
| Theorem | odudlatb 18619 | The dual of a distributive lattice is a distributive lattice and conversely. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ DLat)) | ||
| Theorem | dlatjmdi 18620 | In a distributive lattice, joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
| Syntax | cipo 18621 | Class function defining inclusion posets. |
| class toInc | ||
| Definition | df-ipo 18622* |
For any family of sets, define the poset of that family ordered by
inclusion. See ipobas 18625, ipolerval 18626, and ipole 18628 for its contract.
EDITORIAL: I'm not thrilled with the name. Any suggestions? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ toInc = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} / 𝑜⦌({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑓〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘𝑜)〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), 𝑜〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑓 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑓 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})〉})) | ||
| Theorem | ipostr 18623 | The structure of df-ipo 18622 is a structure defining indices up to 11. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), 𝐽〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), ≤ 〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), ⊥ 〉}) Struct 〈1, ;11〉 | ||
| Theorem | ipoval 18624* | Value of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐹〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘ ≤ )〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), ≤ 〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})〉})) | ||
| Theorem | ipobas 18625 | Base set of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 = (Base‘𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | ipolerval 18626* | Relation of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} = (le‘𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | ipotset 18627 | Topology of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (ordTop‘ ≤ ) = (TopSet‘𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | ipole 18628 | Weak order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | ipolt 18629 | Strict order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊊ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | ipopos 18630 | The inclusion poset on a family of sets is actually a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ Poset | ||
| Theorem | isipodrs 18631* | Condition for a family of sets to be directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | ipodrscl 18632 | Direction by inclusion as used here implies sethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | ipodrsfi 18633* | Finite upper bound property for directed collections of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | fpwipodrs 18634 | The finite subsets of any set are directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (toInc‘(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) ∈ Dirset) | ||
| Theorem | ipodrsima 18635* | The monotone image of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑢) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑣)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘𝐵) ∈ Dirset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘(𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ∈ Dirset) | ||
| Theorem | isacs3lem 18636* | An algebraic closure system satisfies isacs3 18644. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | acsdrsel 18637 | An algebraic closure system contains all directed unions of closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | isacs4lem 18638* | In a closure system in which directed unions of closed sets are closed, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡)))) | ||
| Theorem | isacs5lem 18639* | If closure commutes with directed unions, then the closure of a set is the closure of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)))) | ||
| Theorem | acsdrscl 18640 | In an algebraic closure system, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑌) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | acsficl 18641 | A closure in an algebraic closure system is the union of the closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | isacs5 18642* | A closure system is algebraic iff the closure of a generating set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)))) | ||
| Theorem | isacs4 18643* | A closure system is algebraic iff closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑠)))) | ||
| Theorem | isacs3 18644* | A closure system is algebraic iff directed unions of closed sets are closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | acsficld 18645 | In an algebraic closure system, the closure of a set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. Deduction form of acsficl 18641. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝑁 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | acsficl2d 18646* | In an algebraic closure system, an element is in the closure of a set if and only if it is in the closure of a finite subset. Alternate form of acsficl 18641. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | acsfiindd 18647 | In an algebraic closure system, a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are independent. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | acsmapd 18648* | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑇 is contained in the closure of 𝑆, there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 contains 𝑇. This is proven by applying acsficl2d 18646 to each element of 𝑇. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘∪ ran 𝑓))) | ||
| Theorem | acsmap2d 18649* | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is independent, then there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that 𝑆 equals the union of ran 𝑓. This is proven by taking the map 𝑓 from acsmapd 18648 and observing that, since 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure, the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 must contain 𝑆. Since 𝑆 is independent, by mrissmrcd 17734, ∪ ran 𝑓 must equal 𝑆. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑆 = ∪ ran 𝑓)) | ||
| Theorem | acsinfd 18650 | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 is infinite. This follows from applying unirnffid 9318 to the map given in acsmap2d 18649. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑇 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | acsdomd 18651 | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This follows from applying acsinfd 18650 and then applying unirnfdomd 10580 to the map given in acsmap2d 18649. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | acsinfdimd 18652 | In an algebraic closure system, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is infinite, then they are equinumerous. This is proven by using acsdomd 18651 twice with acsinfd 18650. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | acsexdimd 18653* | In an algebraic closure system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure, they are equinumerous. See mreexfidimd 17744 for the finite case and acsinfdimd 18652 for the infinite case. This is a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | mrelatglb 18654 | Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) See mrelatglbALT 49930 for an alternate proof. |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | mrelatglb0 18655 | The empty intersection in a Moore space is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | mrelatlub 18656 | Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) See mrelatlubALT 49929 for an alternate proof. |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈)) | ||
| Theorem | mreclatBAD 18657* | A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 7374 update): Reprove using isclat 18594 instead of the isclatBAD. hypothesis. See commented-out mreclat above. See mreclat 49931 for a good version. |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐼 ∈ Poset ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ (Base‘𝐼) → (((lub‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼) ∧ ((glb‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat) | ||
See commented-out notes for lattices as relations. | ||
| Syntax | cps 18658 | Extend class notation with the class of all posets. |
| class PosetRel | ||
| Syntax | ctsr 18659 | Extend class notation with the class of all totally ordered sets. |
| class TosetRel | ||
| Definition | df-ps 18660 | Define the class of all posets (partially ordered sets) with weak ordering (e.g., "less than or equal to" instead of "less than"). A poset is a relation which is transitive, reflexive, and antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ PosetRel = {𝑟 ∣ (Rel 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∩ ◡𝑟) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟))} | ||
| Definition | df-tsr 18661 | Define the class of all totally ordered sets. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) |
| ⊢ TosetRel = {𝑟 ∈ PosetRel ∣ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟) ⊆ (𝑟 ∪ ◡𝑟)} | ||
| Theorem | isps 18662 | The predicate "is a poset" i.e. a transitive, reflexive, antisymmetric relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ (Rel 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)))) | ||
| Theorem | psrel 18663 | A poset is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ PosetRel → Rel 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | psref2 18664 | A poset is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | pstr2 18665 | A poset is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | pslem 18666 | Lemma for psref 18668 and others. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅 → 𝐴𝑅𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | psdmrn 18667 | The domain and range of a poset equal its field. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (dom 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅 ∧ ran 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | psref 18668 | A poset is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | psrn 18669 | The range of a poset equals it domain. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑋 = ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | psasym 18670 | A poset is antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pstr 18671 | A poset is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cnvps 18672 | The converse of a poset is a poset. In the general case (◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → 𝑅 ∈ PosetRel) is not true. See cnvpsb 18673 for a special case where the property holds. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel) | ||
| Theorem | cnvpsb 18673 | The converse of a poset is a poset. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ PosetRel)) | ||
| Theorem | psss 18674 | Any subset of a partially ordered set is partially ordered. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ PosetRel) | ||
| Theorem | psssdm2 18675 | Field of a subposet. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel → dom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | psssdm 18676 | Field of a subposet. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋) → dom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | istsr 18677 | The predicate is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ (𝑋 × 𝑋) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | istsr2 18678* | The predicate is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 1-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ↔ (𝑅 ∈ PosetRel ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | tsrlin 18679 | A toset is a linear order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tsrlemax 18680 | Two ways of saying a number is less than or equal to the maximum of two others. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐶, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | tsrps 18681 | A toset is a poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → 𝑅 ∈ PosetRel) | ||
| Theorem | cnvtsr 18682 | The converse of a toset is a toset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → ◡𝑅 ∈ TosetRel ) | ||
| Theorem | tsrss 18683 | Any subset of a totally ordered set is totally ordered. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ TosetRel → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ TosetRel ) | ||
| Theorem | ledm 18684 | The domain of ≤ is ℝ*. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ℝ* = dom ≤ | ||
| Theorem | lern 18685 | The range of ≤ is ℝ*. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ℝ* = ran ≤ | ||
| Theorem | lefld 18686 | The field of the 'less or equal to' relationship on the extended real. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ℝ* = ∪ ∪ ≤ | ||
| Theorem | letsr 18687 | The "less than or equal to" relationship on the extended reals is a toset. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ≤ ∈ TosetRel | ||
| Syntax | cdir 18688 | Extend class notation with the class of directed sets. |
| class DirRel | ||
| Syntax | ctail 18689 | Extend class notation with the tail function for directed sets. |
| class tail | ||
| Definition | df-dir 18690 | Define the class of directed sets (the order relation itself is sometimes called a direction, and a directed set is a set equipped with a direction). (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) |
| ⊢ DirRel = {𝑟 ∣ ((Rel 𝑟 ∧ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟) ∧ ((𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (∪ ∪ 𝑟 × ∪ ∪ 𝑟) ⊆ (◡𝑟 ∘ 𝑟)))} | ||
| Definition | df-tail 18691* | Define the tail function for directed sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) |
| ⊢ tail = (𝑟 ∈ DirRel ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑟 ↦ (𝑟 “ {𝑥}))) | ||
| Theorem | isdir 18692 | A condition for a relation to be a direction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ DirRel ↔ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅))))) | ||
| Theorem | reldir 18693 | A direction is a relation. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DirRel → Rel 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dirdm 18694 | A direction's domain is equal to its field. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DirRel → dom 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dirref 18695 | A direction is reflexive. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dirtr 18696 | A direction is transitive. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | dirge 18697* | For any two elements of a directed set, there exists a third element greater than or equal to both. Note that this does not say that the two elements have a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = dom 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DirRel ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | tsrdir 18698 | A totally ordered set is a directed set. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Nov-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ TosetRel → 𝐴 ∈ DirRel) | ||
| Syntax | cchn 18699 | Extend class notation with the class of (finite) chains. |
| class ( < Chain 𝐴) | ||
| Definition | df-chn 18700* | Define the class of (finite) chains. A chain is defined to be a sequence of objects, where each object is less than the next one in the sequence. The term "chain" is usually used in order theory. In the context of algebra, chains are often called "towers", for example for fields, or "series", for example for subgroup or subnormal series. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ ( < Chain 𝐴) = {𝑐 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ (dom 𝑐 ∖ {0})(𝑐‘(𝑛 − 1)) < (𝑐‘𝑛)} | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |