Theorem nfwlim 36170

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfwlim.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nfwlim.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfwlim	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfwlim

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlim 36161	. 2 ⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
2		nfcv 2924	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
3		nfwlim.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		nfwlim.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
5	3, 3, 4	nfinf 9429	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
6	2, 5	nfne 3058	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
7	4, 3, 2	nfpred 6293	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)
8	7, 3, 4	nfsup 9397	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
9	8	nfeq2 2941	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
10	6, 9	nfan 1919	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))
11	10, 3	nfrabw 3451	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
12	1, 11	nfcxfr 2922	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1560  Ⅎwnfc 2909   ≠ wne 2957  {crab 3414  Predcpred 6287  supcsup 9386  infcinf 9387  WLimcwlim 36159

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-xp 5653  df-cnv 5655  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-pred 6288  df-sup 9388  df-inf 9389  df-wlim 36161

This theorem is referenced by: (None)