Theorem nfwlim 34794

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfwlim.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nfwlim.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfwlim	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfwlim

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlim 34785	. 2 ⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
2		nfcv 2904	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
3		nfwlim.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		nfwlim.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
5	3, 3, 4	nfinf 9477	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
6	2, 5	nfne 3044	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
7	4, 3, 2	nfpred 6306	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)
8	7, 3, 4	nfsup 9446	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
9	8	nfeq2 2921	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
10	6, 9	nfan 1903	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))
11	10, 3	nfrabw 3469	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
12	1, 11	nfcxfr 2902	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542  Ⅎwnfc 2884   ≠ wne 2941  {crab 3433  Predcpred 6300  supcsup 9435  infcinf 9436  WLimcwlim 34783

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pr 5428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-xp 5683  df-cnv 5685  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-pred 6301  df-sup 9437  df-inf 9438  df-wlim 34785

This theorem is referenced by: (None)