Theorem nfwlim 32667

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfwlim.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nfwlim.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfwlim	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfwlim

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlim 32658	. 2 ⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
2		nfcv 2925	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
3		nfwlim.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		nfwlim.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
5	3, 3, 4	nfinf 8739	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
6	2, 5	nfne 3063	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
7	4, 3, 2	nfpred 5988	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)
8	7, 3, 4	nfsup 8708	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
9	8	nfeq2 2940	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
10	6, 9	nfan 1863	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))
11	10, 3	nfrab 3318	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
12	1, 11	nfcxfr 2923	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 387   = wceq 1508  Ⅎwnfc 2909   ≠ wne 2960  {crab 3085  Predcpred 5982  supcsup 8697  infcinf 8698  WLimcwlim 32656

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1759  ax-4 1773  ax-5 1870  ax-6 1929  ax-7 1966  ax-8 2053  ax-9 2060  ax-10 2080  ax-11 2094  ax-12 2107  ax-13 2302  ax-ext 2743  ax-sep 5056  ax-nul 5063  ax-pr 5182

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 835  df-3an 1071  df-tru 1511  df-ex 1744  df-nf 1748  df-sb 2017  df-mo 2548  df-eu 2585  df-clab 2752  df-cleq 2764  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3090  df-v 3410  df-dif 3825  df-un 3827  df-in 3829  df-ss 3836  df-nul 4173  df-if 4345  df-sn 4436  df-pr 4438  df-op 4442  df-uni 4709  df-br 4926  df-opab 4988  df-xp 5409  df-cnv 5411  df-dm 5413  df-rn 5414  df-res 5415  df-ima 5416  df-pred 5983  df-sup 8699  df-inf 8700  df-wlim 32658

This theorem is referenced by: (None)