Theorem nfwlim 35646

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfwlim.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nfwlim.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfwlim	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfwlim

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlim 35637	. 2 ⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
2		nfcv 2892	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
3		nfwlim.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		nfwlim.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
5	3, 3, 4	nfinf 9525	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
6	2, 5	nfne 3033	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
7	4, 3, 2	nfpred 6317	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)
8	7, 3, 4	nfsup 9494	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
9	8	nfeq2 2910	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
10	6, 9	nfan 1895	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))
11	10, 3	nfrabw 3457	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
12	1, 11	nfcxfr 2890	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1534  Ⅎwnfc 2876   ≠ wne 2930  {crab 3419  Predcpred 6311  supcsup 9483  infcinf 9484  WLimcwlim 35635

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5304  ax-nul 5311  ax-pr 5433

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3420  df-v 3464  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4326  df-if 4534  df-sn 4634  df-pr 4636  df-op 4640  df-uni 4914  df-br 5154  df-opab 5216  df-xp 5688  df-cnv 5690  df-dm 5692  df-rn 5693  df-res 5694  df-ima 5695  df-pred 6312  df-sup 9485  df-inf 9486  df-wlim 35637

This theorem is referenced by: (None)