P. 349 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 34801-34900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
21.3.27.3  The Ternary Goldbach Conjecture: Final Statement
Axiom	ax-hgt749 34801*	Statement 7.49 of [Helfgott] p. 70. For a sufficiently big odd 𝑁, this postulates the existence of smoothing functions ℎ (eta star) and 𝑘 (eta plus) such that the lower bound for the circle integral is big enough. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} ((;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑛 → ∃ℎ ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)∃𝑘 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)(∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑘‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (ℎ‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14) ∧ ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑛↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · ℎ)vts𝑛)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝑘)vts𝑛)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑛 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥))
Axiom	ax-ros335 34802	Theorem 12. of [RosserSchoenfeld] p. 71. Theorem chpo1ubb 27448 states that the ψ function is bounded by a linear term; this axiom postulates an upper bound for that linear term. This is stated as an axiom until a formal proof can be provided. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (ψ‘𝑥) < ((1._0_3_8_83) · 𝑥)
Axiom	ax-ros336 34803	Theorem 13. of [RosserSchoenfeld] p. 71. Theorem chpchtlim 27446 states that the ψ and θ function are asymtotic to each other; this axiom postulates an upper bound for their difference. This is stated as an axiom until a formal proof can be provided. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ((ψ‘𝑥) − (θ‘𝑥)) < ((1._4_2_62) · (√‘𝑥))
Theorem	hgt750lemc 34804*	An upper bound to the summatory function of the von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(Λ‘𝑗) < ((1._0_3_8_83) · 𝑁))
Theorem	hgt750lemd 34805*	An upper bound to the summatory function of the von Mangoldt function on non-primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑖 ∈ (((1...𝑁) ∖ ℙ) ∪ {2})(Λ‘𝑖) < ((1._4_2_63) · (√‘𝑁)))
Theorem	hgt749d 34806*	A deduction version of ax-hgt749 34801. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)∃𝑘 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)(∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑘‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (ℎ‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14) ∧ ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · ℎ)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝑘)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥))
Theorem	logdivsqrle 34807	Conditions for ((log x ) / ( sqrt 𝑥)) to be decreasing. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp‘2) ≤ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((log‘𝐵) / (√‘𝐵)) ≤ ((log‘𝐴) / (√‘𝐴)))
Theorem	hgt750lem 34808	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 34819. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) → ((7._3_48) · ((log‘𝑁) / (√‘𝑁))) < (0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48))
Theorem	hgt750lem2 34809	Decimal multiplication galore! (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (3 · ((((1._0_7_9_9_55)↑2) · (1._4_14)) · ((1._4_2_63) · (1._0_3_8_83)))) < (7._3_48)
Theorem	hgt750lemf 34810*	Lemma for the statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘0) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘1) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘2) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 (((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) ≤ (((𝑃↑2) · 𝑄) · Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2))))))
Theorem	hgt750lemg 34811*	Lemma for the statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. Applying a permutation 𝑇 to the three factors of a product does not change the result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝑐 ∘ 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(0..^3)–1-1-onto→(0..^3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:(0..^3)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:ℕ⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘0)) · ((𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘1)) · (𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘2)))) = ((𝐿‘(𝑁‘0)) · ((𝐿‘(𝑁‘1)) · (𝐿‘(𝑁‘2)))))
Theorem	oddprm2 34812*	Two ways to write the set of odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    ⇒   ⊢ (ℙ ∖ {2}) = (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)
Theorem	hgt750lemb 34813*	An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘0) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) ≤ ((log‘𝑁) · (Σ𝑖 ∈ (((1...𝑁) ∖ ℙ) ∪ {2})(Λ‘𝑖) · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(Λ‘𝑗))))
Theorem	hgt750lema 34814*	An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘0) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑑 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘𝑎) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)} ↦ (𝑑 ∘ if(𝑎 = 0, ( I ↾ (0..^3)), ((pmTrsp‘(0..^3))‘{𝑎, 0}))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ ((ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∖ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) ≤ (3 · Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2))))))
Theorem	hgt750leme 34815*	An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ ((ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∖ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) ≤ (((7._3_48) · ((log‘𝑁) / (√‘𝑁))) · (𝑁↑2)))
Theorem	tgoldbachgnn 34816*	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 34819. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	tgoldbachgtde 34817*	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 34819. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < Σ𝑛 ∈ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁)(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))))
Theorem	tgoldbachgtda 34818*	Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 34819. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁)))
Theorem	tgoldbachgtd 34819*	Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁)))
Theorem	tgoldbachgt 34820*	Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 , expressed using the set 𝐺 of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐺))
21.3.28  Elementary Geometry
21.3.28.1  Two-dimensional geometry This definition has been superseded by DimTarskiG≥ and is no longer needed in the main part of set.mm. It is only kept here for reference.
Syntax	cstrkg2d 34821	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the planarity axioms.
class TarskiG2D
Definition	df-trkg2d 34822*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axiom, Axiom A8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12, and the upper dimension axiom, Axiom A9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13, for dimension 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ TarskiG2D = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((((𝑥𝑑𝑢) = (𝑥𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑢) = (𝑦𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑧𝑑𝑢) = (𝑧𝑑𝑣)) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))))}
Theorem	istrkg2d 34823*	Property of fulfilling dimension 2 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((((𝑥 − 𝑢) = (𝑥 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑢) = (𝑦 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑧 − 𝑢) = (𝑧 − 𝑣)) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))))))
Theorem	axtglowdim2ALTV 34824*	Alternate version of axtglowdim2 28542. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)))
Theorem	axtgupdim2ALTV 34825	Alternate version of axtgupdim2 28543. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑈) = (𝑋 − 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑈) = (𝑌 − 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝑈) = (𝑍 − 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
21.3.28.2  Outer Five Segment (not used, no need to move to main)
Syntax	cafs 34826	Declare the syntax for the outer five segment configuration.
class AFS
Definition	df-afs 34827*	The outer five segment configuration is an abbreviation for the conditions of the Five Segment Axiom (axtg5seg 28537). See df-ofs 36177. Definition 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)
⊢ AFS = (𝑔 ∈ TarskiG ↦ {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / ℎ][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑒 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑓 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩⟩ ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎ℎ𝑏) = (𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∧ (𝑏ℎ𝑐) = (𝑦ℎ𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎ℎ𝑑) = (𝑥ℎ𝑤) ∧ (𝑏ℎ𝑑) = (𝑦ℎ𝑤))))})
Theorem	afsval 34828*	Value of the AFS relation for a given geometry structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (AFS‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑒 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑓 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩⟩ ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑐) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎 − 𝑏) = (𝑥 − 𝑦) ∧ (𝑏 − 𝑐) = (𝑦 − 𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎 − 𝑑) = (𝑥 − 𝑤) ∧ (𝑏 − 𝑑) = (𝑦 − 𝑤))))})
Theorem	brafs 34829	Binary relation form of the outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (AFS‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩𝑂⟨⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩, ⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩⟩ ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝑌 − 𝑍)) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐷) = (𝑋 − 𝑊) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝑊)))))
Theorem	tg5segofs 34830	Rephrase axtg5seg 28537 using the outer five segment predicate. Theorem 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (AFS‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩𝑂⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐻, 𝐼⟩⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) = (𝐻 − 𝐼))
21.3.29  LeftPad Project See https://github.com/tirix/lets-prove-leftpad.
Syntax	clpad 34831	Extend class notation with the leftpad function.
class leftpad
Definition	df-lpad 34832*	Define the leftpad function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ leftpad = (𝑐 ∈ V, 𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑙 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((0..^(𝑙 − (♯‘𝑤))) × {𝑐}) ++ 𝑤)))
Theorem	lpadval 34833	Value of the leftpad function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿) = (((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) ++ 𝑊))
Theorem	lpadlem1 34834	Lemma for the leftpad theorems. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) ∈ Word 𝑆)
Theorem	lpadlem3 34835	Lemma for lpadlen1 34836. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) = ∅)
Theorem	lpadlen1 34836	Length of a left-padded word, in the case the length of the given word 𝑊 is at least the desired length. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = (♯‘𝑊))
Theorem	lpadlem2 34837	Lemma for the leftpad theorems. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑊) ≤ 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶})) = (𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊)))
Theorem	lpadlen2 34838	Length of a left-padded word, in the case the given word 𝑊 is shorter than the desired length. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑊) ≤ 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = 𝐿)
Theorem	lpadmax 34839	Length of a left-padded word, in the general case, expressed with an if statement. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = if(𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊), (♯‘𝑊), 𝐿))
Theorem	lpadleft 34840	The contents of prefix of a left-padded word is always the letter 𝐶. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)‘𝑁) = 𝐶)
Theorem	lpadright 34841	The suffix of a left-padded word the original word 𝑊. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = if(𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊), 0, (𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)‘(𝑁 + 𝑀)) = (𝑊‘𝑁))
21.4  Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim Note: On 4-Sep-2016 and after, 745 unused theorems were deleted from this mathbox, and 359 theorems used only once or twice were merged into their referencing theorems. The originals can be recovered from set.mm versions prior to this date.
Syntax	w-bnj17 34842	Extend wff notation with the 4-way conjunction. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)
Definition	df-bnj17 34843	Define the 4-way conjunction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃))
Syntax	c-bnj14 34844	Extend class notation with the function giving: the class of all elements of 𝐴 that are "smaller" than 𝑋 according to 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.)
class pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-bnj14 34845*	Define the function giving: the class of all elements of 𝐴 that are "smaller" than 𝑋 according to 𝑅. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋}
Syntax	w-bnj13 34846	Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝑅 is set-like on 𝐴. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff 𝑅 Se 𝐴
Definition	df-bnj13 34847*	Define the following predicate: 𝑅 is set-like on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
Syntax	w-bnj15 34848	Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝑅 is both well-founded and set-like on 𝐴. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴
Definition	df-bnj15 34849	Define the following predicate: 𝑅 is both well-founded and set-like on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴))
Syntax	c-bnj18 34850	Extend class notation with the function giving: the transitive closure of 𝑋 in 𝐴 by 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.)
class trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-bnj18 34851*	Define the function giving: the transitive closure of 𝑋 in 𝐴 by 𝑅. This definition has been designed for facilitating verification that it is eliminable and that the $d restrictions are sound and complete. For a more readable definition see bnj882 35082. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑓 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}∪ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑖)
Syntax	w-bnj19 34852	Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝐵 is transitive for 𝐴 and 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.)
wff TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-bnj19 34853*	Define the following predicate: 𝐵 is transitive for 𝐴 and 𝑅. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ( TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵)
21.4.1  First-order logic and set theory
Theorem	bnj170 34854	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	bnj240 34855	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜓′)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜒′)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓′ ∧ 𝜒′))
Theorem	bnj248 34856	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj250 34857	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj251 34858	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))))
Theorem	bnj252 34859	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj253 34860	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj255 34861	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj256 34862	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bnj257 34863	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj258 34864	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj268 34865	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj290 34866	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj291 34867	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj312 34868	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj334 34869	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj345 34870	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj422 34871	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj432 34872	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	bnj446 34873	∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	bnj23 34874*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑦 → [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	bnj31 34875	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)
Theorem	bnj62 34876*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 Fn 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj89 34877*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑦]∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥[𝑍 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	bnj90 34878*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑌 / 𝑥]𝑧 Fn 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 Fn 𝑌)
Theorem	bnj101 34879	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓
Theorem	bnj105 34880	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o ∈ V
Theorem	bnj115 34881	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝜏 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ∀𝑛((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj132 34882*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	bnj133 34883	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜒)
Theorem	bnj156 34884	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜁0 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))    &   ⊢ (𝜁1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜁0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁1 ↔ (𝑔 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑1 ∧ 𝜓1))
Theorem	bnj158 34885*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ω 𝑚 = suc 𝑝)
Theorem	bnj168 34886*	First-order logic and set theory. Revised to remove dependence on ax-reg 9497. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by NM, 21-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑛 ≠ 1o ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷) → ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
Theorem	bnj206 34887	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜒)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′ ∧ 𝜒′))
Theorem	bnj216 34888	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj219 34889	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑛 = suc 𝑚 → 𝑚 E 𝑛)
Theorem	bnj226 34890*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	bnj228 34891	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj519 34892	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	bnj524 34893	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
Theorem	bnj525 34894*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	bnj534 34895*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj538 34896*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 30-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	bnj529 34897	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝐷 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	bnj551 34898	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖) → 𝑝 = 𝑖)
Theorem	bnj563 34899	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))    &   ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜌) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚)
Theorem	bnj564 34900	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜏 → dom 𝑓 = 𝑚)