Theorem rspcedv 3565

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 248	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3563	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ∃wrex 3056

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3566  rspcev  3572  rspcedvd  3574  0csh0  14695  gcdcllem1  16405  nn0gsumfz  19891  pmatcollpw3lem  22693  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22697  pm2mpfo  22724  f1otrg  28844  cusgrfilem2  29430  wwlksnredwwlkn  29868  wwlksnextprop  29885  clwwlknun  30084  cusconngr  30163  xrofsup  32742  esum2d  34098  rexzrexnn0  42837  onsucelab  43296  ordnexbtwnsuc  43300  ov2ssiunov2  43733  requad2  47654  lcoel0  48460  lcoss  48468  el0ldep  48498  ldepspr  48505  islindeps2  48515  isldepslvec2  48517  affinecomb1  48734  isisod  49059