Theorem rspcedv 3574

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 251	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3572	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∃wrex 3089

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3575  rspcev  3581  rspcedvd  3583  0csh0  14826  gcdcllem1  16552  nn0gsumfz  20049  pmatcollpw3lem  22940  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22944  pm2mpfo  22971  f1otrg  29220  cusgrfilem2  29806  wwlksnredwwlkn  30244  wwlksnextprop  30261  clwwlknun  30463  cusconngr  30542  xrofsup  33112  esum2d  34483  rexzrexnn0  43531  onsucelab  43990  ordnexbtwnsuc  43994  ov2ssiunov2  44426  requad2  48388  lcoel0  49208  lcoss  49216  el0ldep  49246  ldepspr  49253  islindeps2  49263  isldepslvec2  49265  affinecomb1  49482  isisod  49805