Theorem rspcedv 3574

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 250	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3572	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1560   ∈ wcel 2142  ∃wrex 3086

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-tru 1563  df-ex 1800  df-sb 2091  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3575  rspcev  3581  rspcedvd  3583  0csh0  14806  gcdcllem1  16533  nn0gsumfz  20024  pmatcollpw3lem  22843  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22847  pm2mpfo  22874  f1otrg  29071  cusgrfilem2  29657  wwlksnredwwlkn  30095  wwlksnextprop  30112  clwwlknun  30314  cusconngr  30393  xrofsup  32969  esum2d  34390  rexzrexnn0  43381  onsucelab  43840  ordnexbtwnsuc  43844  ov2ssiunov2  44276  requad2  48245  lcoel0  49050  lcoss  49058  el0ldep  49088  ldepspr  49095  islindeps2  49105  isldepslvec2  49107  affinecomb1  49324  isisod  49648