Theorem rspcedv 3569

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 248	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3567	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  ∃wrex 3060

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3570  rspcev  3576  rspcedvd  3578  0csh0  14716  gcdcllem1  16426  nn0gsumfz  19913  pmatcollpw3lem  22727  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22731  pm2mpfo  22758  f1otrg  28943  cusgrfilem2  29530  wwlksnredwwlkn  29968  wwlksnextprop  29985  clwwlknun  30187  cusconngr  30266  xrofsup  32847  esum2d  34250  rexzrexnn0  43046  onsucelab  43505  ordnexbtwnsuc  43509  ov2ssiunov2  43941  requad2  47869  lcoel0  48674  lcoss  48682  el0ldep  48712  ldepspr  48719  islindeps2  48729  isldepslvec2  48731  affinecomb1  48948  isisod  49272