Theorem rspcedv 3618

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 250	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3616	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3141

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1781  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3619  rspcev  3625  rspcedvd  3628  0csh0  14157  gcdcllem1  15850  nn0gsumfz  19106  pmatcollpw3lem  21393  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  21397  pm2mpfo  21424  f1otrg  26659  cusgrfilem2  27240  wwlksnredwwlkn  27675  wwlksnextprop  27693  clwwlknun  27893  cusconngr  27972  xrofsup  30494  esum2d  31354  rexzrexnn0  39408  ov2ssiunov2  40052  requad2  43795  lcoel0  44490  lcoss  44498  el0ldep  44528  ldepspr  44535  islindeps2  44545  isldepslvec2  44547  affinecomb1  44696