Theorem rspcedv 3570

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 248	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3568	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∃wrex 3053

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2701

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3571  rspcev  3577  rspcedvd  3579  0csh0  14699  gcdcllem1  16410  nn0gsumfz  19863  pmatcollpw3lem  22668  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22672  pm2mpfo  22699  f1otrg  28816  cusgrfilem2  29402  wwlksnredwwlkn  29840  wwlksnextprop  29857  clwwlknun  30056  cusconngr  30135  xrofsup  32710  esum2d  34060  rexzrexnn0  42777  onsucelab  43236  ordnexbtwnsuc  43240  ov2ssiunov2  43673  requad2  47607  lcoel0  48413  lcoss  48421  el0ldep  48451  ldepspr  48458  islindeps2  48468  isldepslvec2  48470  affinecomb1  48687  isisod  49012