Theorem rspcedv 3553

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 249	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3551	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ∃wrex 3063

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-tru 1550  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3554  rspcev  3560  rspcedvd  3562  0csh0  14746  gcdcllem1  16459  nn0gsumfz  19950  pmatcollpw3lem  22766  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22770  pm2mpfo  22797  f1otrg  28957  cusgrfilem2  29543  wwlksnredwwlkn  29981  wwlksnextprop  29998  clwwlknun  30200  cusconngr  30279  xrofsup  32859  esum2d  34277  rexzrexnn0  43249  onsucelab  43708  ordnexbtwnsuc  43712  ov2ssiunov2  44144  requad2  48114  lcoel0  48919  lcoss  48927  el0ldep  48957  ldepspr  48964  islindeps2  48974  isldepslvec2  48976  affinecomb1  49193  isisod  49517