Theorem rspcedv 3567

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 248	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3565	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  ∃wrex 3058

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2705

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2808  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3059

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3568  rspcev  3574  rspcedvd  3576  0csh0  14710  gcdcllem1  16420  nn0gsumfz  19906  pmatcollpw3lem  22708  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22712  pm2mpfo  22739  f1otrg  28859  cusgrfilem2  29446  wwlksnredwwlkn  29884  wwlksnextprop  29901  clwwlknun  30103  cusconngr  30182  xrofsup  32761  esum2d  34117  rexzrexnn0  42911  onsucelab  43370  ordnexbtwnsuc  43374  ov2ssiunov2  43807  requad2  47737  lcoel0  48543  lcoss  48551  el0ldep  48581  ldepspr  48588  islindeps2  48598  isldepslvec2  48600  affinecomb1  48817  isisod  49142