Theorem rspcedv 3577

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 251	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3575	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃wrex 3092

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093

This theorem is used by:  rspcebdv  3578  rspcev  3584  rspcedvd  3586  0csh0  14841  gcdcllem1  16567  nn0gsumfz  20064  pmatcollpw3lem  22955  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22959  pm2mpfo  22986  f1otrg  29235  cusgrfilem2  29821  wwlksnredwwlkn  30259  wwlksnextprop  30276  clwwlknun  30478  cusconngr  30557  xrofsup  33127  esum2d  34496  rexzrexnn0  43563  onsucelab  44022  ordnexbtwnsuc  44026  ov2ssiunov2  44458  requad2  48420  lcoel0  49240  lcoss  49248  el0ldep  49278  ldepspr  49285  islindeps2  49295  isldepslvec2  49297  affinecomb1  49514  isisod  49837