Theorem rspcedv 3557

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 248	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3555	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3061

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3558  rspcev  3564  rspcedvd  3566  0csh0  14755  gcdcllem1  16468  nn0gsumfz  19959  pmatcollpw3lem  22748  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  22752  pm2mpfo  22779  f1otrg  28939  cusgrfilem2  29525  wwlksnredwwlkn  29963  wwlksnextprop  29980  clwwlknun  30182  cusconngr  30261  xrofsup  32840  esum2d  34237  rexzrexnn0  43232  onsucelab  43691  ordnexbtwnsuc  43695  ov2ssiunov2  44127  requad2  48099  lcoel0  48904  lcoss  48912  el0ldep  48942  ldepspr  48949  islindeps2  48959  isldepslvec2  48961  affinecomb1  49178  isisod  49502