Theorem rspcedv 3570

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 251	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3568	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3087

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088

This theorem is used by:  rspcebdv  3571  rspcev  3577  rspcedvd  3579  0csh0  14937  gcdcllem1  16662  nn0gsumfz  20191  pmatcollpw3lem  23094  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  23098  pm2mpfo  23125  f1otrg  29441  cusgrfilem2  30030  wwlksnredwwlkn  30477  wwlksnextprop  30494  clwwlknun  30696  cusconngr  30785  xrofsup  33352  esum2d  34718  rexzrexnn0  43790  onsucelab  44249  ordnexbtwnsuc  44253  ov2ssiunov2  44685  requad2  48690  lcoel0  49509  lcoss  49517  el0ldep  49547  ldepspr  49554  islindeps2  49564  isldepslvec2  49566  affinecomb1  49783  isisod  50104