Theorem supnub 9365

Description: An upper bound is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supnub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem supnub

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
2		supcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
3	1, 2	suplub 9363	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
4	3	expdimp 453	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
5		dfrex2 3066	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧)
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 252	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
7	6	con2d 134	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
8	7	expimpd 454	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∈ wcel 2119  ∀wral 3053  ∃wrex 3063   class class class wbr 5072   Or wor 5525  supcsup 9343

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3or 1093  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rmo 3344  df-reu 3345  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-sbc 3724  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-uni 4839  df-br 5073  df-po 5526  df-so 5527  df-iota 6441  df-riota 7313  df-sup 9345

This theorem is referenced by:  supssd  9366  dgrlb  26219  supinf  42726