Theorem supnub 9375

Description: An upper bound is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supnub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem supnub

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
2		supcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
3	1, 2	suplub 9373	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
4	3	expdimp 452	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
5		dfrex2 3064	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧)
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 251	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
7	6	con2d 134	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
8	7	expimpd 453	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3051  ∃wrex 3061   class class class wbr 5085   Or wor 5538  supcsup 9353

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rmo 3342  df-reu 3343  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-sbc 3729  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-po 5539  df-so 5540  df-iota 6454  df-riota 7324  df-sup 9355

This theorem is referenced by:  supssd  9376  dgrlb  26201  supinf  42681