Theorem supnub 9402

Description: An upper bound is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supnub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem supnub

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
2		supcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
3	1, 2	suplub 9400	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
4	3	expdimp 456	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
5		dfrex2 3088	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧)
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 253	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
7	6	con2d 134	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
8	7	expimpd 457	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∈ wcel 2141  ∀wral 3075  ∃wrex 3085   class class class wbr 5097   Or wor 5550  supcsup 9380

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3or 1098  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-br 5098  df-po 5551  df-so 5552  df-iota 6472  df-riota 7348  df-sup 9382

This theorem is referenced by:  supssd  9403  dgrlb  26284  supinf  42819