Theorem supnub 9423

Description: An upper bound is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supmo.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
supcl.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supnub	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝐶

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem supnub

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supmo.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
2		supcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
3	1, 2	suplub 9421	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
4	3	expdimp 457	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
5		dfrex2 3092	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧)
6	4, 5	imbitrdi 254	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ¬ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
7	6	con2d 135	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
8	7	expimpd 458	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∈ wcel 2143  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089   class class class wbr 5110   Or wor 5570  supcsup 9401

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-iota 6494  df-riota 7369  df-sup 9403

This theorem is referenced by:  supssd  9424  dgrlb  26374  supinf  42991