Theorem xpcan 6028

Description: Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpcan	⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem xpcan

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xp11 6027	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
2		eqid 2821	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐶
3	2	biantrur 533	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
4	1, 3	syl6bbr 291	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5		nne 3020	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
6		simpr 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
7		xpeq2 5571	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × ∅))
8		xp0 6010	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐶 × ∅) = ∅
9	7, 8	syl6eq 2872	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = ∅)
10	9	eqeq1d 2823	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∅ = (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
11		eqcom 2828	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∅ = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅)
12	10, 11	syl6bb 289	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅))
13	12	adantl 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅))
14		df-ne 3017	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐶 = ∅)
15		xpeq0 6012	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐶 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅))
16		orel1 885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐶 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐵 = ∅))
17	15, 16	syl5bi 244	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
18	14, 17	sylbi 219	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
19	18	adantr 483	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
20	13, 19	sylbid 242	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐵 = ∅))
21		eqtr3 2843	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
22	6, 20, 21	syl6an 682	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
23	5, 22	sylan2b 595	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24		xpeq2 5571	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵))
25	23, 24	impbid1 227	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26	4, 25	pm2.61dan 811	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∨ wo 843   = wceq 1533   ≠ wne 3016  ∅c0 4291   × cxp 5548

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5196  ax-nul 5203  ax-pr 5322

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3497  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-br 5060  df-opab 5122  df-xp 5556  df-rel 5557  df-cnv 5558  df-dm 5560  df-rn 5561

This theorem is referenced by: (None)