Theorem xpcan 6157

Description: Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpcan	⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem xpcan

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xp11 6156	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
2		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐶
3	2	biantrur 538	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
4	1, 3	bitr4di 291	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5		nne 2960	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
6		simpr 488	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
7		xpeq2 5664	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × ∅))
8		xp0 5743	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐶 × ∅) = ∅
9	7, 8	eqtrdi 2812	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = ∅)
10	9	eqeq1d 2763	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∅ = (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
11		eqcom 2768	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∅ = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅)
12	10, 11	bitrdi 289	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅))
13	12	adantl 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅))
14		df-ne 2957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐶 = ∅)
15		xpeq0 6141	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐶 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅))
16		orel1 899	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐶 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐵 = ∅))
17	15, 16	biimtrid 244	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
18	14, 17	sylbi 219	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
19	18	adantr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
20	13, 19	sylbid 242	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐵 = ∅))
21		eqtr3 2783	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
22	6, 20, 21	syl6an 694	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
23	5, 22	sylan2b 603	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24		xpeq2 5664	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵))
25	23, 24	impbid1 227	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26	4, 25	pm2.61dan 822	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 858   = wceq 1559   ≠ wne 2956  ∅c0 4283   × cxp 5641

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-11 2190  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5243  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-xp 5649  df-rel 5650  df-cnv 5651  df-dm 5653  df-rn 5654

This theorem is referenced by:  diag1f1lem  49888  diag2f1lem  49890