Theorem xpcan2 6159

Description: Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpcan2	⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem xpcan2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xp11 6157	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐶)))
2		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐶
3	2	biantru 537	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐶))
4	1, 3	bitr4di 291	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5		nne 2960	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
6		simpl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
7		xpeq1 5659	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (∅ × 𝐶))
8		0xp 5744	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∅ × 𝐶) = ∅
9	7, 8	eqtrdi 2812	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = ∅)
10	9	eqeq1d 2763	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ∅ = (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
11		eqcom 2768	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∅ = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅)
12	10, 11	bitrdi 289	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅))
13	12	adantr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅))
14		df-ne 2957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐶 = ∅)
15		xpeq0 6142	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐶 = ∅))
16		orel2 901	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐶 = ∅) → 𝐵 = ∅))
17	15, 16	biimtrid 244	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
18	14, 17	sylbi 219	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
19	18	adantl 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
20	13, 19	sylbid 242	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐵 = ∅))
21		eqtr3 2783	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
22	6, 20, 21	syl6an 694	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
23		xpeq1 5659	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶))
24	22, 23	impbid1 227	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
25	5, 24	sylanb 590	. 2 ⊢ ((¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26	4, 25	pm2.61ian 821	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 858   = wceq 1559   ≠ wne 2956  ∅c0 4285   × cxp 5643

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-11 2190  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5245  ax-pr 5389

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-xp 5651  df-rel 5652  df-cnv 5653  df-dm 5655  df-rn 5656

This theorem is referenced by: (None)