MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  xpcan2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem xpcan2 6168
Description: Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
xpcan2 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem xpcan2
StepHypRef Expression
1 xp11 6166 . . 3 ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐶)))
2 eqid 2760 . . . 4 𝐶 = 𝐶
32biantru 539 . . 3 (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐶))
41, 3bitr4di 292 . 2 ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5 nne 2959 . . 3 (¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
6 simpl 488 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
7 xpeq1 5664 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (∅ × 𝐶))
8 0xp 5749 . . . . . . . . . 10 (∅ × 𝐶) = ∅
97, 8eqtrdi 2811 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = ∅)
109eqeq1d 2762 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ∅ = (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
11 eqcom 2767 . . . . . . . 8 (∅ = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅)
1210, 11bitrdi 290 . . . . . . 7 (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅))
1312adantr 486 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅))
14 df-ne 2956 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐶 = ∅)
15 xpeq0 6150 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐶 = ∅))
16 orel2 904 . . . . . . . . 9 (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐶 = ∅) → 𝐵 = ∅))
1715, 16biimtrid 245 . . . . . . . 8 (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
1814, 17sylbi 220 . . . . . . 7 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
1918adantl 487 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
2013, 19sylbid 243 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐵 = ∅))
21 eqtr3 2782 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
226, 20, 21syl6an 697 . . . 4 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
23 xpeq1 5664 . . . 4 (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶))
2422, 23impbid1 228 . . 3 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
255, 24sylanb 593 . 2 ((¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
264, 25pm2.61ian 824 1 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1569   ≠ wne 2955  ∅c0 4278   × cxp 5648
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator