MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  xpcan2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem xpcan2 6168
Description: Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
xpcan2 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem xpcan2
StepHypRef Expression
1 xp11 6166 . . 3 ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐶)))
2 eqid 2761 . . . 4 𝐶 = 𝐶
32biantru 539 . . 3 (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐶))
41, 3bitr4di 292 . 2 ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5 nne 2960 . . 3 (¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
6 simpl 488 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
7 xpeq1 5665 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (∅ × 𝐶))
8 0xp 5750 . . . . . . . . . 10 (∅ × 𝐶) = ∅
97, 8eqtrdi 2812 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = ∅)
109eqeq1d 2763 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ∅ = (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
11 eqcom 2768 . . . . . . . 8 (∅ = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅)
1210, 11bitrdi 290 . . . . . . 7 (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅))
1312adantr 486 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅))
14 df-ne 2957 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐶 = ∅)
15 xpeq0 6150 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐶 = ∅))
16 orel2 904 . . . . . . . . 9 (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐶 = ∅) → 𝐵 = ∅))
1715, 16biimtrid 245 . . . . . . . 8 (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
1814, 17sylbi 220 . . . . . . 7 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
1918adantl 487 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
2013, 19sylbid 243 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐵 = ∅))
21 eqtr3 2783 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
226, 20, 21syl6an 697 . . . 4 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
23 xpeq1 5665 . . . 4 (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶))
2422, 23impbid1 228 . . 3 ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
255, 24sylanb 593 . 2 ((¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
264, 25pm2.61ian 824 1 (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ≠ wne 2956  ∅c0 4279   × cxp 5649
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-pr 5391
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662
This theorem is used by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator