Theorem ssrnres 6181

Description: Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product): the LHS expresses inclusion in the range of the restricted relation, while the RHS expresses equality with the range of the restricted and corestricted relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssrnres	⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem ssrnres

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inss2 4193	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)
2	1	rnssi 5935	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ran (𝐴 × 𝐵)
3		rnxpss 6175	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵
4	2, 3	sstri 3949	. . 3 ⊢ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵
5		eqss 3955	. . 3 ⊢ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵 ↔ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))))
6	4, 5	mpbiran 722	. 2 ⊢ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))
7		inxpssres 5683	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)
8	7	rnssi 5935	. . . 4 ⊢ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)
9		sstr 3948	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	mpan2 704	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴))
11		ssel 3934	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)))
12		vex 3462	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
13	12	elrn2 5887	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴))
14	11, 13	imbitrdi 254	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)))
15	14	ancld 560	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴))))
16	12	elrn2 5887	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))
17		opelinxp 5746	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐶))
18	12	opelresi 5991	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐶))
19	18	bianassc 656	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐶))
20	17, 19	bitr4i 281	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)))
21	20	exbii 1881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)))
22		19.42v 1986	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)))
23	16, 21, 22	3bitri 300	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴)))
24	15, 23	imbitrrdi 255	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))))
25	24	ssrdv 3946	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))
26	10, 25	impbii 212	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴))
27	6, 26	bitr2i 279	1 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146   ∩ cin 3907   ⊆ wss 3908  ⟨cop 4600   × cxp 5664  ran crn 5667   ↾ cres 5668

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-11 2195  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678

This theorem is used by:  rninxp  6182