| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Deduction eliminating an antecedent. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61d.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) |
| pm2.61d.2 | ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61d | ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm2.61d.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | com12 11 | . 2 ⊢ (ψ → (φ → χ)) |
| 3 | pm2.61d.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) | |
| 4 | 3 | com12 11 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ψ → (φ → χ)) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | pm2.61i 126 | 1 ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 2 → wi 3 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pm2.61d1 128 pm2.61d2 129 pm2.61dan 477 a12stdy4 1374 pm2.61dne 1633 ordsson 2987 ordunidif 3001 findsg 3153 tfindsg 3158 fvco 3769 dff2 3812 omwordi 4195 omass 4204 eceqopreq 4306 pssnn 4522 unxpdomlem 4826 prlem936 5138 ssgt0sr 5200 suppsr2 5206 suppsr3 5207 elcncf 7217 cnconst 7740 atdmd 10281 atmd2 10283 mdsymlem4 10289 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |