Theorem bj-omtrans 13991

Description: The set om is transitive. A natural number is included in om. Constructive proof of elnn 4590.

The idea is to use bounded induction with the formula x C_ om. This formula, in a logic with terms, is bounded. So in our logic without terms, we need to temporarily replace it with x C_ a and then deduce the original claim. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omtrans	|- ( A e. om -> A C_ om )

Proof of Theorem bj-omtrans

Dummy variables x a y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-omex 13977	. . 3 |- om e. _V
2		sseq2 3171	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = om -> ( y C_ a <-> y C_ om ) )
3		sseq2 3171	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = om -> ( suc y C_ a <-> suc y C_ om ) )
4	2, 3	imbi12d 233	. . . . 5 |- ( a = om -> ( ( y C_ a -> suc y C_ a ) <-> ( y C_ om -> suc y C_ om ) ) )
5	4	ralbidv 2470	. . . 4 |- ( a = om -> ( A. y e. om ( y C_ a -> suc y C_ a ) <-> A. y e. om ( y C_ om -> suc y C_ om ) ) )
6		sseq2 3171	. . . . 5 |- ( a = om -> ( A C_ a <-> A C_ om ) )
7	6	imbi2d 229	. . . 4 |- ( a = om -> ( ( A e. om -> A C_ a ) <-> ( A e. om -> A C_ om ) ) )
8	5, 7	imbi12d 233	. . 3 |- ( a = om -> ( ( A. y e. om ( y C_ a -> suc y C_ a ) -> ( A e. om -> A C_ a ) ) <-> ( A. y e. om ( y C_ om -> suc y C_ om ) -> ( A e. om -> A C_ om ) ) ) )
9		0ss 3453	. . . 4 |- (/) C_ a
10		bdcv 13883	. . . . . 6 |- BOUNDED a
11	10	bdss 13899	. . . . 5 |- BOUNDED x C_ a
12		nfv 1521	. . . . 5 |- F/ x (/) C_ a
13		nfv 1521	. . . . 5 |- F/ x y C_ a
14		nfv 1521	. . . . 5 |- F/ x suc y C_ a
15		sseq1 3170	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = (/) -> ( x C_ a <-> (/) C_ a ) )
16	15	biimprd 157	. . . . 5 |- ( x = (/) -> ( (/) C_ a -> x C_ a ) )
17		sseq1 3170	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = y -> ( x C_ a <-> y C_ a ) )
18	17	biimpd 143	. . . . 5 |- ( x = y -> ( x C_ a -> y C_ a ) )
19		sseq1 3170	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = suc y -> ( x C_ a <-> suc y C_ a ) )
20	19	biimprd 157	. . . . 5 |- ( x = suc y -> ( suc y C_ a -> x C_ a ) )
21		nfcv 2312	. . . . 5 |- F/_ x A
22		nfv 1521	. . . . 5 |- F/ x A C_ a
23		sseq1 3170	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = A -> ( x C_ a <-> A C_ a ) )
24	23	biimpd 143	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( x C_ a -> A C_ a ) )
25	11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24	bj-bdfindisg 13983	. . . 4 |- ( ( (/) C_ a /\ A. y e. om ( y C_ a -> suc y C_ a ) ) -> ( A e. om -> A C_ a ) )
26	9, 25	mpan 422	. . 3 |- ( A. y e. om ( y C_ a -> suc y C_ a ) -> ( A e. om -> A C_ a ) )
27	1, 8, 26	vtocl 2784	. 2 |- ( A. y e. om ( y C_ om -> suc y C_ om ) -> ( A e. om -> A C_ om ) )
28		df-suc 4356	. . . 4 |- suc y = ( y u. { y } )
29		simpr 109	. . . . 5 |- ( ( y e. om /\ y C_ om ) -> y C_ om )
30		simpl 108	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. om /\ y C_ om ) -> y e. om )
31	30	snssd 3725	. . . . 5 |- ( ( y e. om /\ y C_ om ) -> { y } C_ om )
32	29, 31	unssd 3303	. . . 4 |- ( ( y e. om /\ y C_ om ) -> ( y u. { y } ) C_ om )
33	28, 32	eqsstrid 3193	. . 3 |- ( ( y e. om /\ y C_ om ) -> suc y C_ om )
34	33	ex 114	. 2 |- ( y e. om -> ( y C_ om -> suc y C_ om ) )
35	27, 34	mprg 2527	1 |- ( A e. om -> A C_ om )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1348   e. wcel 2141   A.wral 2448   u. cun 3119   C_ wss 3121   (/)c0 3414   {csn 3583   suc csuc 4350   omcom 4574

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-13 2143  ax-14 2144  ax-ext 2152  ax-nul 4115  ax-pr 4194  ax-un 4418  ax-bd0 13848  ax-bdor 13851  ax-bdal 13853  ax-bdex 13854  ax-bdeq 13855  ax-bdel 13856  ax-bdsb 13857  ax-bdsep 13919  ax-infvn 13976

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-ral 2453  df-rex 2454  df-rab 2457  df-v 2732  df-dif 3123  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134  df-nul 3415  df-sn 3589  df-pr 3590  df-uni 3797  df-int 3832  df-suc 4356  df-iom 4575  df-bdc 13876  df-bj-ind 13962

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omtrans2  13992  bj-nnord  13993  bj-nn0suc  13999