ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  sbthlemi4 Unicode version

Theorem sbthlemi4 7277
Description: Lemma for isbth 7284. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
sbthlem.1  |-  A  e. 
_V
sbthlem.2  |-  D  =  { x  |  ( x  C_  A  /\  ( g " ( B  \  ( f "
x ) ) ) 
C_  ( A  \  x ) ) }
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbthlemi4  |-  ( (EXMID  /\  ( dom  g  =  B  /\  ran  g  C_  A )  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  ( `' g " ( A  \  U. D ) )  =  ( B 
\  ( f " U. D ) ) )
Distinct variable groups:    x, A    x, B    x, D    x, f    x, g
Allowed substitution hints:    A( f,  g)    B( f,  g)    D( f,  g)

Proof of Theorem sbthlemi4
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-ima 4787 . 2  |-  ( `' g " ( A 
\  U. D ) )  =  ran  ( `' g  |`  ( A  \ 
U. D ) )
2 difss 3355 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( B 
\  ( f " U. D ) )  C_  B
3 sseq2 3272 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( dom  g  =  B  -> 
( ( B  \ 
( f " U. D ) )  C_  dom  g  <->  ( B  \ 
( f " U. D ) )  C_  B ) )
42, 3mpbiri 168 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( dom  g  =  B  -> 
( B  \  (
f " U. D
) )  C_  dom  g )
5 ssdmres 5085 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( B  \  ( f
" U. D ) )  C_  dom  g  <->  dom  ( g  |`  ( B  \  (
f " U. D
) ) )  =  ( B  \  (
f " U. D
) ) )
64, 5sylib 122 . . . . . 6  |-  ( dom  g  =  B  ->  dom  ( g  |`  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) )  =  ( B  \ 
( f " U. D ) ) )
7 dfdm4 4973 . . . . . 6  |-  dom  (
g  |`  ( B  \ 
( f " U. D ) ) )  =  ran  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) )
86, 7eqtr3di 2286 . . . . 5  |-  ( dom  g  =  B  -> 
( B  \  (
f " U. D
) )  =  ran  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) ) )
98adantr 276 . . . 4  |-  ( ( dom  g  =  B  /\  ran  g  C_  A )  ->  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) )  =  ran  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  (
f " U. D
) ) ) )
1093ad2ant2 1050 . . 3  |-  ( (EXMID  /\  ( dom  g  =  B  /\  ran  g  C_  A )  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) )  =  ran  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  (
f " U. D
) ) ) )
11 funcnvres 5454 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( Fun  `' g  ->  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) )  =  ( `' g  |`  ( g " ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) ) ) )
12113ad2ant3 1051 . . . . . 6  |-  ( (EXMID  /\ 
ran  g  C_  A  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  (
f " U. D
) ) )  =  ( `' g  |`  ( g " ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) ) ) )
13 sbthlem.1 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  A  e. 
_V
14 sbthlem.2 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  D  =  { x  |  ( x  C_  A  /\  ( g " ( B  \  ( f "
x ) ) ) 
C_  ( A  \  x ) ) }
1513, 14sbthlemi3 7276 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( (EXMID  /\ 
ran  g  C_  A
)  ->  ( g " ( B  \ 
( f " U. D ) ) )  =  ( A  \  U. D ) )
1615reseq2d 5063 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( (EXMID  /\ 
ran  g  C_  A
)  ->  ( `' g  |`  ( g "
( B  \  (
f " U. D
) ) ) )  =  ( `' g  |`  ( A  \  U. D ) ) )
17163adant3 1048 . . . . . 6  |-  ( (EXMID  /\ 
ran  g  C_  A  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  ( `' g  |`  ( g " ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) ) )  =  ( `' g  |`  ( A  \ 
U. D ) ) )
1812, 17eqtrd 2271 . . . . 5  |-  ( (EXMID  /\ 
ran  g  C_  A  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  (
f " U. D
) ) )  =  ( `' g  |`  ( A  \  U. D
) ) )
1918rneqd 5011 . . . 4  |-  ( (EXMID  /\ 
ran  g  C_  A  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  ran  `' (
g  |`  ( B  \ 
( f " U. D ) ) )  =  ran  ( `' g  |`  ( A  \ 
U. D ) ) )
20193adant2l 1263 . . 3  |-  ( (EXMID  /\  ( dom  g  =  B  /\  ran  g  C_  A )  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  ran  `' ( g  |`  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) ) )  =  ran  ( `' g  |`  ( A  \ 
U. D ) ) )
2110, 20eqtrd 2271 . 2  |-  ( (EXMID  /\  ( dom  g  =  B  /\  ran  g  C_  A )  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  ( B  \  ( f " U. D ) )  =  ran  ( `' g  |`  ( A  \  U. D ) ) )
221, 21eqtr4id 2290 1  |-  ( (EXMID  /\  ( dom  g  =  B  /\  ran  g  C_  A )  /\  Fun  `' g )  ->  ( `' g " ( A  \  U. D ) )  =  ( B 
\  ( f " U. D ) ) )
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    /\ w3a 1009    = wceq 1402    e. wcel 2209   {cab 2224   _Vcvv 2821    \ cdif 3217    C_ wss 3220   U.cuni 3935  EXMIDwem 4331   `'ccnv 4773   dom cdm 4774   ran crn 4775    |` cres 4776   "cima 4777   Fun wfun 5371
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 843  df-dc 847  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-exmid 4332  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-fun 5379
This theorem is used by:  sbthlemi6  7279  sbthlemi8  7281
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator