Theorem bj-inf2vn2 16110

Description: A sufficient condition for ω to be a set; unbounded version of bj-inf2vn 16109. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-inf2vn2	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝐴 = ω))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bj-inf2vn2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-inf2vnlem1 16105	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → Ind 𝐴)
2		biimp 118	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
3	2	alimi 1479	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
4		df-ral 2491	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
5	3, 4	sylibr 134	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦))
6		bj-inf2vnlem4 16108	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) → (Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
7	5, 6	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
8	7	alrimiv 1898	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
9	1, 8	jca 306	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (Ind 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧)))
10		bj-om 16072	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ω ↔ (Ind 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))))
11	9, 10	imbitrrid 156	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝐴 = ω))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 710  ∀wal 1371   = wceq 1373   ∈ wcel 2178  ∀wral 2486  ∃wrex 2487   ⊆ wss 3174  ∅c0 3468  suc csuc 4430  ωcom 4656  Ind wind 16061

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2180  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-nul 4186  ax-pr 4269  ax-un 4498  ax-setind 4603  ax-bd0 15948  ax-bdor 15951  ax-bdex 15954  ax-bdeq 15955  ax-bdel 15956  ax-bdsb 15957  ax-bdsep 16019

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-rab 2495  df-v 2778  df-dif 3176  df-un 3178  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187  df-nul 3469  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-uni 3865  df-int 3900  df-suc 4436  df-iom 4657  df-bdc 15976  df-bj-ind 16062

This theorem is referenced by: (None)