Theorem bj-inf2vn2 16570

Description: A sufficient condition for ω to be a set; unbounded version of bj-inf2vn 16569. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-inf2vn2	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝐴 = ω))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bj-inf2vn2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-inf2vnlem1 16565	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → Ind 𝐴)
2		biimp 118	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
3	2	alimi 1503	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
4		df-ral 2515	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
5	3, 4	sylibr 134	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦))
6		bj-inf2vnlem4 16568	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) → (Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
7	5, 6	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
8	7	alrimiv 1922	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
9	1, 8	jca 306	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (Ind 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧)))
10		bj-om 16532	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ω ↔ (Ind 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))))
11	9, 10	imbitrrid 156	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝐴 = ω))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 715  ∀wal 1395   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2202  ∀wral 2510  ∃wrex 2511   ⊆ wss 3200  ∅c0 3494  suc csuc 4462  ωcom 4688  Ind wind 16521

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-nul 4215  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635  ax-bd0 16408  ax-bdor 16411  ax-bdex 16414  ax-bdeq 16415  ax-bdel 16416  ax-bdsb 16417  ax-bdsep 16479

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-uni 3894  df-int 3929  df-suc 4468  df-iom 4689  df-bdc 16436  df-bj-ind 16522

This theorem is referenced by: (None)