Theorem bj-nnen2lp 16575

Description: A version of en2lp 4652 for natural numbers, which does not require ax-setind 4635.

Note: using this theorem and bj-nnelirr 16574, one can remove dependency on ax-setind 4635 from nntri2 6662 and nndcel 6668; one can actually remove more dependencies from these. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nnen2lp	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem bj-nnen2lp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-nnelirr 16574	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵)
2	1	adantl 277	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵)
3		bj-nntrans 16572	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
4	3	adantl 277	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
5		ssel 3221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵))
6	4, 5	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵)))
7	6	impd 254	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵))
8	2, 7	mtod 669	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∈ wcel 2202   ⊆ wss 3200  ωcom 4688

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-nul 4215  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-bd0 16434  ax-bdor 16437  ax-bdn 16438  ax-bdal 16439  ax-bdex 16440  ax-bdeq 16441  ax-bdel 16442  ax-bdsb 16443  ax-bdsep 16505  ax-infvn 16562

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-uni 3894  df-int 3929  df-suc 4468  df-iom 4689  df-bdc 16462  df-bj-ind 16548

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-peano4  16576