Theorem bj-nnen2lp 16963

Description: A version of en2lp 4699 for natural numbers, which does not require ax-setind 4682.

Note: using this theorem and bj-nnelirr 16962, one can remove dependency on ax-setind 4682 from nntri2 6761 and nndcel 6767; one can actually remove more dependencies from these. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nnen2lp	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem bj-nnen2lp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-nnelirr 16962	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵)
2	1	adantl 277	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵)
3		bj-nntrans 16960	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
4	3	adantl 277	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
5		ssel 3242	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵))
6	4, 5	syl6 33	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵)))
7	6	impd 254	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐵))
8	2, 7	mtod 673	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∈ wcel 2209   ⊆ wss 3220  ωcom 4735

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-13 2211  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-nul 4257  ax-pr 4344  ax-un 4576  ax-bd0 16822  ax-bdor 16825  ax-bdn 16826  ax-bdal 16827  ax-bdex 16828  ax-bdeq 16829  ax-bdel 16830  ax-bdsb 16831  ax-bdsep 16893  ax-infvn 16950

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-sn 3714  df-pr 3715  df-uni 3934  df-int 3969  df-suc 4514  df-iom 4736  df-bdc 16850  df-bj-ind 16936

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-peano4  16964