Theorem bj-peano4 12574

Description: Remove from peano4 4440 dependency on ax-setind 4381. Therefore, it only requires core constructive axioms (albeit more of them). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-peano4	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-peano4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3simpa 943	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω))
2		pm3.22 262	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω))
3		bj-nnen2lp 12573	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	1, 2, 3	3syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
5		sucidg 4267	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵)
6		eleq2 2158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵))
7	5, 6	syl5ibrcom 156	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
8		elsucg 4255	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
9	7, 8	sylibd 148	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10	9	imp 123	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	3adant1 964	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
12		sucidg 4267	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
13		eleq2 2158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
14	12, 13	syl5ibcom 154	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
15		elsucg 4255	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
16	14, 15	sylibd 148	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
17	16	imp 123	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
18	17	3adant2 965	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
19	11, 18	jca 301	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
20		eqcom 2097	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
21	20	orbi2i 717	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
22	21	anbi1i 447	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
23	19, 22	sylib 121	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
24		ordir 769	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
25	23, 24	sylibr 133	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26	25	ord 681	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
27	4, 26	mpd 13	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
28	27	3expia 1148	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
29		suceq 4253	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
30	28, 29	impbid1 141	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 667   ∧ w3a 927   = wceq 1296   ∈ wcel 1445  suc csuc 4216  ωcom 4433

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 582  ax-in2 583  ax-io 668  ax-5 1388  ax-7 1389  ax-gen 1390  ax-ie1 1434  ax-ie2 1435  ax-8 1447  ax-10 1448  ax-11 1449  ax-i12 1450  ax-bndl 1451  ax-4 1452  ax-13 1456  ax-14 1457  ax-17 1471  ax-i9 1475  ax-ial 1479  ax-i5r 1480  ax-ext 2077  ax-nul 3986  ax-pr 4060  ax-un 4284  ax-bd0 12428  ax-bdor 12431  ax-bdn 12432  ax-bdal 12433  ax-bdex 12434  ax-bdeq 12435  ax-bdel 12436  ax-bdsb 12437  ax-bdsep 12499  ax-infvn 12560

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 929  df-tru 1299  df-nf 1402  df-sb 1700  df-clab 2082  df-cleq 2088  df-clel 2091  df-nfc 2224  df-ral 2375  df-rex 2376  df-rab 2379  df-v 2635  df-dif 3015  df-un 3017  df-in 3019  df-ss 3026  df-nul 3303  df-sn 3472  df-pr 3473  df-uni 3676  df-int 3711  df-suc 4222  df-iom 4434  df-bdc 12456  df-bj-ind 12546

This theorem is referenced by: (None)