Theorem bj-peano4 13837

Description: Remove from peano4 4574 dependency on ax-setind 4514. Therefore, it only requires core constructive axioms (albeit more of them). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-peano4	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-peano4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3simpa 984	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω))
2		pm3.22 263	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω))
3		bj-nnen2lp 13836	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	1, 2, 3	3syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
5		sucidg 4394	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵)
6		eleq2 2230	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵))
7	5, 6	syl5ibrcom 156	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
8		elsucg 4382	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
9	7, 8	sylibd 148	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10	9	imp 123	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	3adant1 1005	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
12		sucidg 4394	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
13		eleq2 2230	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
14	12, 13	syl5ibcom 154	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
15		elsucg 4382	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
16	14, 15	sylibd 148	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
17	16	imp 123	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
18	17	3adant2 1006	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
19	11, 18	jca 304	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
20		eqcom 2167	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
21	20	orbi2i 752	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
22	21	anbi1i 454	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
23	19, 22	sylib 121	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
24		ordir 807	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
25	23, 24	sylibr 133	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26	25	ord 714	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
27	4, 26	mpd 13	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
28	27	3expia 1195	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
29		suceq 4380	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
30	28, 29	impbid1 141	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 698   ∧ w3a 968   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  suc csuc 4343  ωcom 4567

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-13 2138  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-nul 4108  ax-pr 4187  ax-un 4411  ax-bd0 13695  ax-bdor 13698  ax-bdn 13699  ax-bdal 13700  ax-bdex 13701  ax-bdeq 13702  ax-bdel 13703  ax-bdsb 13704  ax-bdsep 13766  ax-infvn 13823

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-nul 3410  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-uni 3790  df-int 3825  df-suc 4349  df-iom 4568  df-bdc 13723  df-bj-ind 13809

This theorem is referenced by: (None)