Theorem 2rexbidva 3201

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3160	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3160	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3062

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1782  df-rex 3063

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4478  wrdl3s3  14897  bezoutlem2  16479  bezoutlem4  16481  vdwmc2  16919  lsmcom2  19596  lsmass  19610  lsmcomx  19797  lsmspsn  21048  hausdiag  23601  imasf1oxms  24445  mulsval  28117  mulscom  28147  addsdi  28163  mulsasslem3  28173  mulsunif2lem  28177  z12sge0  28491  istrkg2ld  28544  iscgra  28893  axeuclid  29048  elwwlks2  30054  elwspths2spth  30055  fusgr2wsp2nb  30421  shscom  31407  lsmssass  33495  sategoelfvb  35635  3dim0  39833  islpln5  39911  islvol5  39955  isline2  40150  isline3  40152  paddcom  40189  cdlemg2cex  40967  prprspr2  47878  pgrpgt2nabl  48726  elbigolo1  48917