Theorem 2rexbidva 3197

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3156	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3156	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2113  ∃wrex 3058

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-rex 3059

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4474  wrdl3s3  14883  bezoutlem2  16465  bezoutlem4  16467  vdwmc2  16905  lsmcom2  19582  lsmass  19596  lsmcomx  19783  lsmspsn  21034  hausdiag  23587  imasf1oxms  24431  mulsval  28078  mulscom  28108  addsdi  28124  mulsasslem3  28134  mulsunif2lem  28138  zs12ge0  28432  istrkg2ld  28481  iscgra  28830  axeuclid  28985  elwwlks2  29991  elwspths2spth  29992  fusgr2wsp2nb  30358  shscom  31343  lsmssass  33432  sategoelfvb  35562  3dim0  39656  islpln5  39734  islvol5  39778  isline2  39973  isline3  39975  paddcom  40012  cdlemg2cex  40790  prprspr2  47706  pgrpgt2nabl  48554  elbigolo1  48745