Theorem 2rexbidva 3234

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 472	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3193	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3193	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∈ wcel 2149  ∃wrex 3095

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1807  df-rex 3096

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4489  wrdl3s3  14999  bezoutlem2  16598  bezoutlem4  16600  vdwmc2  17039  lsmcom2  19725  lsmass  19739  lsmcomx  19926  lsmspsn  21183  hausdiag  23771  imasf1oxms  24615  mulsval  28268  mulscom  28298  addsdi  28314  mulsasslem3  28324  mulsunif2lem  28328  z12sge0  28642  istrkg2ld  28695  iscgra  29077  axeuclid  29254  elwwlks2  30259  elwspths2spth  30260  fusgr2wsp2nb  30626  shscom  31612  lsmssass  33655  sategoelfvb  35810  3dim0  40121  islpln5  40199  islvol5  40243  isline2  40438  isline3  40440  paddcom  40477  cdlemg2cex  41255  prprspr2  48156  pgrpgt2nabl  49031  elbigolo1  49222