Theorem 2rexbidva 3201

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3160	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3160	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3062

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1782  df-rex 3063

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4464  wrdl3s3  14918  bezoutlem2  16503  bezoutlem4  16505  vdwmc2  16944  lsmcom2  19624  lsmass  19638  lsmcomx  19825  lsmspsn  21074  hausdiag  23623  imasf1oxms  24467  mulsval  28118  mulscom  28148  addsdi  28164  mulsasslem3  28174  mulsunif2lem  28178  z12sge0  28492  istrkg2ld  28545  iscgra  28894  axeuclid  29049  elwwlks2  30055  elwspths2spth  30056  fusgr2wsp2nb  30422  shscom  31408  lsmssass  33480  sategoelfvb  35620  3dim0  39920  islpln5  39998  islvol5  40042  isline2  40237  isline3  40239  paddcom  40276  cdlemg2cex  41054  prprspr2  47993  pgrpgt2nabl  48857  elbigolo1  49048