Theorem 2rexbidva 3227

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2rexbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3224	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3224	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1784  df-rex 3069

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4453  wrdl3s3  14605  bezoutlem2  16176  bezoutlem4  16178  vdwmc2  16608  lsmcom2  19175  lsmass  19190  lsmcomx  19372  lsmspsn  20261  hausdiag  22704  imasf1oxms  23551  istrkg2ld  26725  iscgra  27074  axeuclid  27234  elwwlks2  28232  elwspths2spth  28233  fusgr2wsp2nb  28599  shscom  29582  lsmssass  31492  sategoelfvb  33281  3dim0  37398  islpln5  37476  islvol5  37520  isline2  37715  isline3  37717  paddcom  37754  cdlemg2cex  38532  prprspr2  44858  pgrpgt2nabl  45590  elbigolo1  45791