Theorem 2rexbidva 3199

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3158	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3158	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2113  ∃wrex 3060

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-rex 3061

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4476  wrdl3s3  14885  bezoutlem2  16467  bezoutlem4  16469  vdwmc2  16907  lsmcom2  19584  lsmass  19598  lsmcomx  19785  lsmspsn  21036  hausdiag  23589  imasf1oxms  24433  mulsval  28105  mulscom  28135  addsdi  28151  mulsasslem3  28161  mulsunif2lem  28165  z12sge0  28479  istrkg2ld  28532  iscgra  28881  axeuclid  29036  elwwlks2  30042  elwspths2spth  30043  fusgr2wsp2nb  30409  shscom  31394  lsmssass  33483  sategoelfvb  35613  3dim0  39727  islpln5  39805  islvol5  39849  isline2  40044  isline3  40046  paddcom  40083  cdlemg2cex  40861  prprspr2  47774  pgrpgt2nabl  48622  elbigolo1  48813