Theorem 2rexbidva 3196

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3155	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3155	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2113  ∃wrex 3057

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-rex 3058

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4471  wrdl3s3  14871  bezoutlem2  16453  bezoutlem4  16455  vdwmc2  16893  lsmcom2  19569  lsmass  19583  lsmcomx  19770  lsmspsn  21020  hausdiag  23561  imasf1oxms  24405  mulsval  28049  mulscom  28079  addsdi  28095  mulsasslem3  28105  mulsunif2lem  28109  zs12ge0  28394  istrkg2ld  28439  iscgra  28788  axeuclid  28943  elwwlks2  29949  elwspths2spth  29950  fusgr2wsp2nb  30316  shscom  31301  lsmssass  33374  sategoelfvb  35484  3dim0  39576  islpln5  39654  islvol5  39698  isline2  39893  isline3  39895  paddcom  39932  cdlemg2cex  40710  prprspr2  47642  pgrpgt2nabl  48490  elbigolo1  48682