Theorem 2rexbidva 3226

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 473	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3185	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3185	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3087

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-rex 3088

This theorem is used by:  2reu4lem  4479  wrdl3s3  15115  bezoutlem2  16713  bezoutlem4  16715  vdwmc2  17157  lsmcom2  19869  lsmass  19883  lsmcomx  20070  lsmspsn  21359  hausdiag  23964  imasf1oxms  24808  mulsval  28495  mulscom  28525  addsdi  28541  mulsasslem3  28551  mulsunif2lem  28555  z12sge0  28869  istrkg2ld  28922  iscgra  29316  axeuclid  29541  elwwlks2  30558  elwspths2spth  30559  fusgr2wsp2nb  30935  shscom  31921  lsmssass  33953  sategoelfvb  36184  ltnmul  36965  nmulle  36966  3dim0  40514  islpln5  40592  islvol5  40636  isline2  40831  isline3  40833  paddcom  40870  cdlemg2cex  41648  prprspr2  48599  pgrpgt2nabl  49477  elbigolo1  49668