Theorem 2rexbidva 3198

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 467	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3155	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3155	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2109  ∃wrex 3053

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780  df-rex 3054

This theorem is referenced by:  2reu4lem  4481  wrdl3s3  14904  bezoutlem2  16486  bezoutlem4  16488  vdwmc2  16926  lsmcom2  19569  lsmass  19583  lsmcomx  19770  lsmspsn  21023  hausdiag  23565  imasf1oxms  24410  mulsval  28052  mulscom  28082  addsdi  28098  mulsasslem3  28108  mulsunif2lem  28112  zs12ge0  28395  istrkg2ld  28440  iscgra  28789  axeuclid  28943  elwwlks2  29946  elwspths2spth  29947  fusgr2wsp2nb  30313  shscom  31298  lsmssass  33366  sategoelfvb  35399  3dim0  39444  islpln5  39522  islvol5  39566  isline2  39761  isline3  39763  paddcom  39800  cdlemg2cex  40578  prprspr2  47512  pgrpgt2nabl  48347  elbigolo1  48539