Theorem 2rexbidva 3229

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2ralbidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rexbidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem 2rexbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2ralbidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	anassrs 473	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	rexbidva 3188	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
4	3	rexbidva 3188	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃wrex 3090

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-rex 3091

This theorem is used by:  2reu4lem  4482  wrdl3s3  15158  bezoutlem2  16757  bezoutlem4  16759  vdwmc2  17201  lsmcom2  19920  lsmass  19934  lsmcomx  20121  lsmspsn  21410  hausdiag  24019  imasf1oxms  24863  mulsval  28552  mulscom  28582  addsdi  28598  mulsasslem3  28608  mulsunif2lem  28612  z12sge0  28926  istrkg2ld  28979  iscgra  29373  axeuclid  29598  elwwlks2  30615  elwspths2spth  30616  fusgr2wsp2nb  30992  shscom  31978  edomediv  33955  lsmssass  34057  sategoelfvb  36392  ltnmul  37180  nmulle  37181  3dim0  40780  islpln5  40858  islvol5  40902  isline2  41097  isline3  41099  paddcom  41136  cdlemg2cex  41914  prprspr2  48873  pgrpgt2nabl  49809  elbigolo1  50000