Theorem lsmcom2 19523

Description: Subgroup sum commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmsubg.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
lsmsubg.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcom2	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcom2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp3 1139	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈))
2	1	sselda 3983	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
3	2	adantrr 716	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
4		simprr 772	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)
5		eqid 2733	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
6		lsmsubg.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)
7	5, 6	cntzi 19193	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
8	3, 4, 7	syl2anc 585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
9	8	eqeq2d 2744	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
10	9	2rexbidva 3218	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
11		rexcom 3288	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 287	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
13		lsmsubg.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
14	5, 13	lsmelval 19517	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
15	14	3adant3 1133	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
16	5, 13	lsmelval 19517	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
17	16	ancoms 460	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
18	17	3adant3 1133	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
19	12, 15, 18	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
20	19	eqrdv 2731	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1088   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  ∃wrex 3071   ⊆ wss 3949  ‘cfv 6544  (class class class)co 7409  +_gcplusg 17197  SubGrpcsubg 19000  Cntzccntz 19179  LSSumclsm 19502

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-rep 5286  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5428  ax-un 7725

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-reu 3378  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-iun 5000  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548  df-f1 6549  df-fo 6550  df-f1o 6551  df-fv 6552  df-ov 7412  df-oprab 7413  df-mpo 7414  df-1st 7975  df-2nd 7976  df-subg 19003  df-cntz 19181  df-lsm 19504

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmdisj3  19551  lsmdisj3r  19554  lsmdisj3a  19557  lsmdisj3b  19558  pj2f  19566  pj1id  19567