Theorem lsmcom2 19175

Description: Subgroup sum commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmsubg.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
lsmsubg.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcom2	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcom2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp3 1136	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈))
2	1	sselda 3917	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
3	2	adantrr 713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
4		simprr 769	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)
5		eqid 2738	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
6		lsmsubg.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)
7	5, 6	cntzi 18850	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
8	3, 4, 7	syl2anc 583	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
9	8	eqeq2d 2749	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
10	9	2rexbidva 3227	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
11		rexcom 3281	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 286	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
13		lsmsubg.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
14	5, 13	lsmelval 19169	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
15	14	3adant3 1130	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
16	5, 13	lsmelval 19169	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
17	16	ancoms 458	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
18	17	3adant3 1130	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
19	12, 15, 18	3bitr4d 310	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
20	19	eqrdv 2736	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064   ⊆ wss 3883  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  +_gcplusg 16888  SubGrpcsubg 18664  Cntzccntz 18836  LSSumclsm 19154

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-1st 7804  df-2nd 7805  df-subg 18667  df-cntz 18838  df-lsm 19156

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmdisj3  19204  lsmdisj3r  19207  lsmdisj3a  19210  lsmdisj3b  19211  pj2f  19219  pj1id  19220