Theorem lsmcom2 19628

Description: Subgroup sum commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmsubg.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
lsmsubg.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcom2	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcom2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp3 1144	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈))
2	1	sselda 3922	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
3	2	adantrr 723	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
4		simprr 778	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)
5		eqid 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
6		lsmsubg.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)
7	5, 6	cntzi 19302	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
8	3, 4, 7	syl2anc 590	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
9	8	eqeq2d 2751	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
10	9	2rexbidva 3203	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
11		rexcom 3269	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 288	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
13		lsmsubg.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
14	5, 13	lsmelval 19622	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
15	14	3adant3 1138	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
16	5, 13	lsmelval 19622	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
17	16	ancoms 459	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
18	17	3adant3 1138	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
19	12, 15, 18	3bitr4d 312	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
20	19	eqrdv 2738	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1092   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ∃wrex 3064   ⊆ wss 3890  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7363  +_gcplusg 17218  SubGrpcsubg 19094  Cntzccntz 19288  LSSumclsm 19607

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2712  ax-rep 5206  ax-sep 5225  ax-nul 5235  ax-pow 5301  ax-pr 5369  ax-un 7685

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2936  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3065  df-reu 3346  df-rab 3393  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3731  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4269  df-if 4462  df-pw 4538  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565  df-op 4569  df-uni 4846  df-iun 4930  df-br 5080  df-opab 5142  df-mpt 5161  df-id 5520  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-ima 5638  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7366  df-oprab 7367  df-mpo 7368  df-1st 7938  df-2nd 7939  df-subg 19097  df-cntz 19290  df-lsm 19609

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmdisj3  19656  lsmdisj3r  19659  lsmdisj3a  19662  lsmdisj3b  19663  pj2f  19671  pj1id  19672