Theorem lsmcom2 19697

Description: Subgroup sum commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmsubg.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
lsmsubg.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcom2	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcom2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp3 1138	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈))
2	1	sselda 4008	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
3	2	adantrr 716	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
4		simprr 772	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)
5		eqid 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
6		lsmsubg.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)
7	5, 6	cntzi 19369	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
8	3, 4, 7	syl2anc 583	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
9	8	eqeq2d 2751	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
10	9	2rexbidva 3226	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
11		rexcom 3296	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 287	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
13		lsmsubg.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
14	5, 13	lsmelval 19691	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
15	14	3adant3 1132	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
16	5, 13	lsmelval 19691	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
17	16	ancoms 458	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
18	17	3adant3 1132	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
19	12, 15, 18	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
20	19	eqrdv 2738	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3076   ⊆ wss 3976  ‘cfv 6573  (class class class)co 7448  +_gcplusg 17311  SubGrpcsubg 19160  Cntzccntz 19355  LSSumclsm 19676

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-ov 7451  df-oprab 7452  df-mpo 7453  df-1st 8030  df-2nd 8031  df-subg 19163  df-cntz 19357  df-lsm 19678

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmdisj3  19725  lsmdisj3r  19728  lsmdisj3a  19731  lsmdisj3b  19732  pj2f  19740  pj1id  19741