Theorem lsmcom2 19564

Description: Subgroup sum commutes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmsubg.p	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
lsmsubg.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcom2	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcom2

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp3 1136	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈))
2	1	sselda 3981	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
3	2	adantrr 713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈))
4		simprr 769	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)
5		eqid 2730	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
6		lsmsubg.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑍 = (Cntz‘𝐺)
7	5, 6	cntzi 19234	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑍‘𝑈) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
8	3, 4, 7	syl2anc 582	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
9	8	eqeq2d 2741	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
10	9	2rexbidva 3215	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
11		rexcom 3285	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 286	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
13		lsmsubg.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
14	5, 13	lsmelval 19558	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
15	14	3adant3 1130	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑎(+g‘𝐺)𝑏)))
16	5, 13	lsmelval 19558	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
17	16	ancoms 457	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
18	17	3adant3 1130	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑏(+g‘𝐺)𝑎)))
19	12, 15, 18	3bitr4d 310	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
20	19	eqrdv 2728	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑍‘𝑈)) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104  ∃wrex 3068   ⊆ wss 3947  ‘cfv 6542  (class class class)co 7411  +_gcplusg 17201  SubGrpcsubg 19036  Cntzccntz 19220  LSSumclsm 19543

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2152  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5284  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pow 5362  ax-pr 5426  ax-un 7727

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2532  df-eu 2561  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2883  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3375  df-rab 3431  df-v 3474  df-sbc 3777  df-csb 3893  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-pw 4603  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-iun 4998  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-id 5573  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-co 5684  df-dm 5685  df-rn 5686  df-res 5687  df-ima 5688  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6544  df-fn 6545  df-f 6546  df-f1 6547  df-fo 6548  df-f1o 6549  df-fv 6550  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-1st 7977  df-2nd 7978  df-subg 19039  df-cntz 19222  df-lsm 19545

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmdisj3  19592  lsmdisj3r  19595  lsmdisj3a  19598  lsmdisj3b  19599  pj2f  19607  pj1id  19608