Theorem lsmcomx 19898

Description: Subgroup sum commutes (extended domain version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx.v	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
lsmcomx.s	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcomx

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl1 1191	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝐺 ∈ Abel)
2		simpl2 1192	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵)
3		simprl 770	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)
4	2, 3	sseldd 4009	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl3 1193	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵)
6		simprr 772	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)
7	5, 6	sseldd 4009	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
8		lsmcomx.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
9		eqid 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
10	8, 9	ablcom 19841	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
11	1, 4, 7, 10	syl3anc 1371	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
12	11	eqeq2d 2751	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
13	12	2rexbidva 3226	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
14		rexcom 3296	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
15	13, 14	bitrdi 287	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
16		lsmcomx.s	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
17	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19682	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧)))
18	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19682	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
19	18	3com23 1126	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
20	15, 17, 19	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
21	20	eqrdv 2738	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3076   ⊆ wss 3976  ‘cfv 6573  (class class class)co 7448  Basecbs 17258  +_gcplusg 17311  LSSumclsm 19676  Abelcabl 19823

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-ov 7451  df-oprab 7452  df-mpo 7453  df-1st 8030  df-2nd 8031  df-lsm 19678  df-cmn 19824  df-abl 19825

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmcom  19900