Theorem lsmcomx 19917

Description: Subgroup sum commutes (extended domain version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx.v	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
lsmcomx.s	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcomx

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl1 1208	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝐺 ∈ Abel)
2		simpl2 1209	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵)
3		simprl 782	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)
4	2, 3	sseldd 3940	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl3 1210	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵)
6		simprr 784	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)
7	5, 6	sseldd 3940	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
8		lsmcomx.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
9		eqid 2765	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
10	8, 9	ablcom 19860	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
11	1, 4, 7, 10	syl3anc 1394	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
12	11	eqeq2d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
13	12	2rexbidva 3228	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
14		rexcom 3294	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
15	13, 14	bitrdi 290	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
16		lsmcomx.s	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
17	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19701	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧)))
18	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19701	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
19	18	3com23 1142	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
20	15, 17, 19	3bitr4d 314	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
21	20	eqrdv 2763	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1563   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3089   ⊆ wss 3907  ‘cfv 6525  (class class class)co 7400  Basecbs 17259  +_gcplusg 17300  LSSumclsm 19695  Abelcabl 19842

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7722

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1566  df-fal 1576  df-ex 1803  df-nf 1807  df-sb 2094  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3371  df-rab 3418  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3856  df-dif 3910  df-un 3912  df-in 3914  df-ss 3924  df-nul 4289  df-if 4484  df-pw 4560  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-op 4592  df-uni 4869  df-iun 4954  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5547  df-xp 5658  df-rel 5659  df-cnv 5660  df-co 5661  df-dm 5662  df-rn 5663  df-res 5664  df-ima 5665  df-iota 6481  df-fun 6527  df-fn 6528  df-f 6529  df-f1 6530  df-fo 6531  df-f1o 6532  df-fv 6533  df-ov 7403  df-oprab 7404  df-mpo 7405  df-1st 7974  df-2nd 7975  df-lsm 19697  df-cmn 19843  df-abl 19844

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmcom  19919