Theorem lsmcomx 19927

Description: Subgroup sum commutes (extended domain version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx.v	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
lsmcomx.s	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcomx

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl1 1210	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝐺 ∈ Abel)
2		simpl2 1211	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵)
3		simprl 782	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)
4	2, 3	sseldd 3939	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl3 1212	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵)
6		simprr 784	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)
7	5, 6	sseldd 3939	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
8		lsmcomx.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
9		eqid 2763	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
10	8, 9	ablcom 19870	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
11	1, 4, 7, 10	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
12	11	eqeq2d 2774	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
13	12	2rexbidva 3228	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
14		rexcom 3294	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
15	13, 14	bitrdi 290	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
16		lsmcomx.s	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
17	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19711	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧)))
18	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19711	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
19	18	3com23 1144	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
20	15, 17, 19	3bitr4d 314	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
21	20	eqrdv 2761	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∃wrex 3089   ⊆ wss 3906  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7412  Basecbs 17270  +_gcplusg 17311  LSSumclsm 19705  Abelcabl 19852

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7987  df-2nd 7988  df-lsm 19707  df-cmn 19853  df-abl 19854

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmcom  19929