Theorem lsmcomx 19372

Description: Subgroup sum commutes (extended domain version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx.v	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
lsmcomx.s	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcomx

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl1 1189	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝐺 ∈ Abel)
2		simpl2 1190	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵)
3		simprl 767	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)
4	2, 3	sseldd 3918	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl3 1191	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵)
6		simprr 769	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)
7	5, 6	sseldd 3918	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
8		lsmcomx.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
9		eqid 2738	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
10	8, 9	ablcom 19319	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
11	1, 4, 7, 10	syl3anc 1369	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
12	11	eqeq2d 2749	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
13	12	2rexbidva 3227	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
14		rexcom 3281	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
15	13, 14	bitrdi 286	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
16		lsmcomx.s	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
17	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19160	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧)))
18	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 19160	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
19	18	3com23 1124	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
20	15, 17, 19	3bitr4d 310	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
21	20	eqrdv 2736	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064   ⊆ wss 3883  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  Basecbs 16840  +_gcplusg 16888  LSSumclsm 19154  Abelcabl 19302

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-1st 7804  df-2nd 7805  df-lsm 19156  df-cmn 19303  df-abl 19304

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmcom  19374