Theorem lsmcomx 18612

Description: Subgroup sum commutes (extended domain version). (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx.v	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
lsmcomx.s	⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lsmcomx	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem lsmcomx

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl1 1248	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝐺 ∈ Abel)
2		simpl2 1250	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵)
3		simprl 789	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)
4	2, 3	sseldd 3828	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl3 1252	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵)
6		simprr 791	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)
7	5, 6	sseldd 3828	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
8		lsmcomx.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
9		eqid 2825	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (+g‘𝐺) = (+g‘𝐺)
10	8, 9	ablcom 18563	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
11	1, 4, 7, 10	syl3anc 1496	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
12	11	eqeq2d 2835	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
13	12	2rexbidva 3266	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
14		rexcom 3309	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦))
15	13, 14	syl6bb 279	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
16		lsmcomx.s	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝐺)
17	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 18406	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 = (𝑦(+g‘𝐺)𝑧)))
18	8, 9, 16	lsmelvalx 18406	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
19	18	3com23 1162	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 𝑥 = (𝑧(+g‘𝐺)𝑦)))
20	15, 17, 19	3bitr4d 303	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇)))
21	20	eqrdv 2823	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) = (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 386   ∧ w3a 1113   = wceq 1658   ∈ wcel 2166  ∃wrex 3118   ⊆ wss 3798  ‘cfv 6123  (class class class)co 6905  Basecbs 16222  +_gcplusg 16305  LSSumclsm 18400  Abelcabl 18547

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-8 2168  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2803  ax-rep 4994  ax-sep 5005  ax-nul 5013  ax-pow 5065  ax-pr 5127  ax-un 7209

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2605  df-eu 2640  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-ne 3000  df-ral 3122  df-rex 3123  df-reu 3124  df-rab 3126  df-v 3416  df-sbc 3663  df-csb 3758  df-dif 3801  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-nul 4145  df-if 4307  df-pw 4380  df-sn 4398  df-pr 4400  df-op 4404  df-uni 4659  df-iun 4742  df-br 4874  df-opab 4936  df-mpt 4953  df-id 5250  df-xp 5348  df-rel 5349  df-cnv 5350  df-co 5351  df-dm 5352  df-rn 5353  df-res 5354  df-ima 5355  df-iota 6086  df-fun 6125  df-fn 6126  df-f 6127  df-f1 6128  df-fo 6129  df-f1o 6130  df-fv 6131  df-ov 6908  df-oprab 6909  df-mpt2 6910  df-1st 7428  df-2nd 7429  df-lsm 18402  df-cmn 18548  df-abl 18549

This theorem is referenced by:  lsmcom  18614