Theorem bnj1234 35410

Description: Technical lemma for bnj60 35459. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1234.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj1234.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj1234.4	⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj1234.5	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1234	⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷

Distinct variable groups:   𝐵,𝑓,𝑔   𝑓,𝐺,𝑔   𝑔,𝑌   𝑓,𝑍   𝑓,𝑑,𝑔   𝑥,𝑓,𝑔

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐷(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐺(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)   𝑍(𝑥, 𝑔, 𝑑)

Proof of Theorem bnj1234

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fneq1 6626	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ↔ 𝑔 Fn 𝑑))
2		fveq1 6880	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝑔‘𝑥))
3		reseq1 5971	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4	3	opeq2d 4844	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩ = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)
5		bnj1234.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
6		bnj1234.4	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
7	4, 5, 6	3eqtr4g 2822	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → 𝑌 = 𝑍)
8	7	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝐺‘𝑌) = (𝐺‘𝑍))
9	2, 8	eqeq12d 2778	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌) ↔ (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍)))
10	9	ralbidv 3187	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍)))
11	1, 10	anbi12d 643	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ((𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) ↔ (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))))
12	11	rexbidv 3188	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))))
13	12	cbvabv 2832	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}
14		bnj1234.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
15		bnj1234.5	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}
16	13, 14, 15	3eqtr4i 2795	1 ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569  {cab 2740  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  ⟨cop 4594   ↾ cres 5662   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536   predc-bnj14 35086

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-res 5672  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-fv 6544

This theorem is used by:  bnj1245  35411  bnj1256  35412  bnj1259  35413  bnj1296  35418  bnj1311  35421