Theorem bnj1234 35710

Description: Technical lemma for bnj60 35759. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1234.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj1234.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj1234.4	⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj1234.5	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1234	⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷

Distinct variable groups:   𝐵,𝑓,𝑔   𝑓,𝐺,𝑔   𝑔,𝑌   𝑓,𝑍   𝑓,𝑑,𝑔   𝑥,𝑓,𝑔

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐷(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐺(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)   𝑍(𝑥, 𝑔, 𝑑)

Proof of Theorem bnj1234

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fneq1 6649	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ↔ 𝑔 Fn 𝑑))
2		fveq1 6904	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝑔‘𝑥))
3		reseq1 5974	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4	3	opeq2d 4850	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩ = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)
5		bnj1234.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
6		bnj1234.4	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑍 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
7	4, 5, 6	3eqtr4g 2823	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → 𝑌 = 𝑍)
8	7	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝐺‘𝑌) = (𝐺‘𝑍))
9	2, 8	eqeq12d 2779	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌) ↔ (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍)))
10	9	ralbidv 3189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍)))
11	1, 10	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ((𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) ↔ (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))))
12	11	rexbidv 3190	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))))
13	12	cbvabv 2834	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))} = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}
14		bnj1234.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
15		bnj1234.5	. 2 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑍))}
16	13, 14, 15	3eqtr4i 2796	1 ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  {cab 2741  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  ⟨cop 4838   ↾ cres 5657   Fn wfn 6550  ‘cfv 6555   predc-bnj14 35386

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-res 5667  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-fv 6563

This theorem is used by:  bnj1245  35711  bnj1256  35712  bnj1259  35713  bnj1296  35718  bnj1311  35721