Theorem bnj60 35459

Description: Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj60.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj60.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj60.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj60.4	⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj60	⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝐵,𝑓   𝐺,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑅,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)

Proof of Theorem bnj60

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj60.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
2		bnj60.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
3		bnj60.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
4	1, 2, 3	bnj1497 35457	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔
5		eqid 2762	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)
6	1, 2, 3, 5	bnj1311 35421	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
7	6	3expia 1138	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → (ℎ ∈ 𝐶 → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
8	7	ralrimiv 3155	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
9	8	ralrimiva 3156	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
10		biid 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔)
11		biid 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) ↔ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
12	10, 5, 11	bnj1383 35228	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
13	4, 9, 12	sylancr 598	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
14		bnj60.4	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶
15	14	funeqi 6557	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ∪ 𝐶)
16	13, 15	sylibr 237	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
17	1, 2, 3, 14	bnj1498 35458	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
18	16, 17	bnj1422 35234	1 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  {cab 2740  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088   ∩ cin 3903   ⊆ wss 3904  ⟨cop 4594  ∪ cuni 4871  dom cdm 5660   ↾ cres 5662  Fun wfun 6530   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536   predc-bnj14 35086   FrSe w-bnj15 35090

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734  ax-reg 9552  ax-inf2 9608

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5555  df-eprel 5560  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-fr 5613  df-we 5615  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-om 7861  df-1o 8451  df-bnj17 35085  df-bnj14 35087  df-bnj13 35089  df-bnj15 35091  df-bnj18 35093  df-bnj19 35095

This theorem is used by:  bnj1501  35464  bnj1523  35468