Theorem bnj60 35612

Description: Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj60.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj60.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj60.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj60.4	⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj60	⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝐵,𝑓   𝐺,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑅,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)

Proof of Theorem bnj60

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj60.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
2		bnj60.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
3		bnj60.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
4	1, 2, 3	bnj1497 35610	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔
5		eqid 2760	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)
6	1, 2, 3, 5	bnj1311 35574	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
7	6	3expia 1139	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → (ℎ ∈ 𝐶 → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
8	7	ralrimiv 3153	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
9	8	ralrimiva 3154	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
10		biid 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔)
11		biid 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) ↔ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
12	10, 5, 11	bnj1383 35381	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
13	4, 9, 12	sylancr 599	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
14		bnj60.4	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶
15	14	funeqi 6549	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ∪ 𝐶)
16	13, 15	sylibr 237	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
17	1, 2, 3, 14	bnj1498 35611	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
18	16, 17	bnj1422 35387	1 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2738  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899  ⟨cop 4590  ∪ cuni 4867  dom cdm 5648   ↾ cres 5650  Fun wfun 6522   Fn wfn 6523  ‘cfv 6528   predc-bnj14 35239   FrSe w-bnj15 35243

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7735  ax-reg 9564  ax-inf2 9620

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5543  df-eprel 5548  df-po 5556  df-so 5557  df-fr 5601  df-we 5603  df-xp 5654  df-rel 5655  df-cnv 5656  df-co 5657  df-dm 5658  df-rn 5659  df-res 5660  df-ima 5661  df-ord 6355  df-on 6356  df-lim 6357  df-suc 6358  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6530  df-fn 6531  df-f 6532  df-f1 6533  df-fo 6534  df-f1o 6535  df-fv 6536  df-om 7862  df-1o 8455  df-bnj17 35238  df-bnj14 35240  df-bnj13 35242  df-bnj15 35244  df-bnj18 35246  df-bnj19 35248

This theorem is used by:  bnj1501  35617  bnj1523  35621