Theorem bnj60 35059

Description: Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj60.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj60.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj60.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj60.4	⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj60	⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝐵,𝑓   𝐺,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑅,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)

Proof of Theorem bnj60

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj60.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
2		bnj60.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
3		bnj60.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
4	1, 2, 3	bnj1497 35057	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔
5		eqid 2730	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)
6	1, 2, 3, 5	bnj1311 35021	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
7	6	3expia 1121	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → (ℎ ∈ 𝐶 → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
8	7	ralrimiv 3125	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
9	8	ralrimiva 3126	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
10		biid 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔)
11		biid 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) ↔ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
12	10, 5, 11	bnj1383 34828	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
13	4, 9, 12	sylancr 587	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
14		bnj60.4	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶
15	14	funeqi 6540	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ∪ 𝐶)
16	13, 15	sylibr 234	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
17	1, 2, 3, 14	bnj1498 35058	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
18	16, 17	bnj1422 34834	1 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2708  ∀wral 3045  ∃wrex 3054   ∩ cin 3916   ⊆ wss 3917  ⟨cop 4598  ∪ cuni 4874  dom cdm 5641   ↾ cres 5643  Fun wfun 6508   Fn wfn 6509  ‘cfv 6514   predc-bnj14 34685   FrSe w-bnj15 34689

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5323  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714  ax-reg 9552  ax-inf2 9601

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-reu 3357  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-csb 3866  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-pss 3937  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5536  df-eprel 5541  df-po 5549  df-so 5550  df-fr 5594  df-we 5596  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-res 5653  df-ima 5654  df-ord 6338  df-on 6339  df-lim 6340  df-suc 6341  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-f 6518  df-f1 6519  df-fo 6520  df-f1o 6521  df-fv 6522  df-om 7846  df-1o 8437  df-bnj17 34684  df-bnj14 34686  df-bnj13 34688  df-bnj15 34690  df-bnj18 34692  df-bnj19 34694

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1501  35064  bnj1523  35068