Theorem dmcosseqOLDOLD 5954

Description: Obsolete version of dmcosseq 5952 as of 23-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmcosseqOLDOLD	⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dmcosseqOLDOLD

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmcoss 5949	. . 3 ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵)
3		ssel 3930	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴))
4		vex 3457	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
5	4	elrn 5867	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
6	4	eldm 5874	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧)
7	5, 6	imbi12i 352	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
8		19.8a 2215	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
9	8	imim1i 63	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
10		pm3.2 473	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → (𝑦𝐴𝑧 → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
11	10	eximdv 1936	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → (∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
12	9, 11	sylcom 30	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
13	7, 12	sylbi 219	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
14	3, 13	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
15	14	eximdv 1936	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
16		excom 2195	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
17	15, 16	imbitrrdi 254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
18		vex 3457	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
19		vex 3457	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
20	18, 19	opelco 5841	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
21	20	exbii 1867	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
22	17, 21	imbitrrdi 254	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)))
23	18	eldm 5874	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
24	18	eldm2 5875	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
25	22, 23, 24	3imtr4g 298	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)))
26	25	ssrdv 3942	. 2 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom 𝐵 ⊆ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
27	2, 26	eqssd 3953	1 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559  ∃wex 1798   ∈ wcel 2141   ⊆ wss 3904  ⟨cop 4587   class class class wbr 5099  dom cdm 5645  ran crn 5646   ∘ ccom 5649

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5245  ax-pr 5389

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-cnv 5653  df-co 5654  df-dm 5655  df-rn 5656

This theorem is referenced by: (None)