Theorem dmcosseqOLDOLD 5930

Description: Obsolete version of dmcosseq 5928 as of 23-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmcosseqOLDOLD	⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dmcosseqOLDOLD

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmcoss 5925	. . 3 ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵)
3		ssel 3928	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴))
4		vex 3445	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
5	4	elrn 5843	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
6	4	eldm 5850	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧)
7	5, 6	imbi12i 350	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
8		19.8a 2189	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
9	8	imim1i 63	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
10		pm3.2 469	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → (𝑦𝐴𝑧 → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
11	10	eximdv 1919	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → (∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
12	9, 11	sylcom 30	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
13	7, 12	sylbi 217	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴) → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
14	3, 13	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
15	14	eximdv 1919	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
16		excom 2168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
17	15, 16	imbitrrdi 252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧)))
18		vex 3445	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
19		vex 3445	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
20	18, 19	opelco 5821	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
21	20	exbii 1850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧))
22	17, 21	imbitrrdi 252	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦 → ∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)))
23	18	eldm 5850	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝐵𝑦)
24	18	eldm2 5851	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
25	22, 23, 24	3imtr4g 296	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)))
26	25	ssrdv 3940	. 2 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom 𝐵 ⊆ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
27	2, 26	eqssd 3952	1 ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2114   ⊆ wss 3902  ⟨cop 4587   class class class wbr 5099  dom cdm 5625  ran crn 5626   ∘ ccom 5629

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5242  ax-nul 5252  ax-pr 5378

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-rab 3401  df-v 3443  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4287  df-if 4481  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636

This theorem is referenced by: (None)