Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > relbrcnvg | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5788 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
relbrcnvg | ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relcnv 6009 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅 | |
2 | 1 | brrelex12i 5641 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
3 | 2 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
4 | brrelex12 5638 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V)) | |
5 | 4 | ancomd 461 | . . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
6 | 5 | ex 412 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵𝑅𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
7 | brcnvg 5785 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | |
8 | 7 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))) |
9 | 3, 6, 8 | pm5.21ndd 380 | 1 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 ∈ wcel 2109 Vcvv 3430 class class class wbr 5078 ◡ccnv 5587 Rel wrel 5593 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1801 ax-4 1815 ax-5 1916 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2014 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-ext 2710 ax-sep 5226 ax-nul 5233 ax-pr 5355 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1786 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2817 df-ral 3070 df-rex 3071 df-rab 3074 df-v 3432 df-dif 3894 df-un 3896 df-in 3898 df-ss 3908 df-nul 4262 df-if 4465 df-sn 4567 df-pr 4569 df-op 4573 df-br 5079 df-opab 5141 df-xp 5594 df-rel 5595 df-cnv 5596 |
This theorem is referenced by: eliniseg2 6011 relbrcnv 6012 isinv 17453 releleccnv 36375 relcnveq2 36437 elrelscnveq2 36590 eqvrelsym 36697 brco2f1o 41595 brco3f1o 41596 ntrclsnvobr 41615 neicvgel1 41682 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |