Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > relbrcnvg | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5804 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
relbrcnvg | ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relcnv 6022 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅 | |
2 | 1 | brrelex12i 5653 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
3 | 2 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
4 | brrelex12 5650 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V)) | |
5 | 4 | ancomd 463 | . . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
6 | 5 | ex 414 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵𝑅𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
7 | brcnvg 5801 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | |
8 | 7 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))) |
9 | 3, 6, 8 | pm5.21ndd 381 | 1 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 397 ∈ wcel 2104 Vcvv 3437 class class class wbr 5081 ◡ccnv 5599 Rel wrel 5605 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2106 ax-9 2114 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5232 ax-nul 5239 ax-pr 5361 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 846 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1780 df-sb 2066 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2814 df-ral 3063 df-rex 3072 df-rab 3287 df-v 3439 df-dif 3895 df-un 3897 df-in 3899 df-ss 3909 df-nul 4263 df-if 4466 df-sn 4566 df-pr 4568 df-op 4572 df-br 5082 df-opab 5144 df-xp 5606 df-rel 5607 df-cnv 5608 |
This theorem is referenced by: eliniseg2 6024 relbrcnv 6025 isinv 17517 releleccnv 36439 relcnveq2 36500 elrelscnveq2 36653 eqvrelsym 36760 brco2f1o 41680 brco3f1o 41681 ntrclsnvobr 41700 neicvgel1 41767 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |