Theorem relbrcnvg 5722

Description: When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5509 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
relbrcnvg	⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))

Proof of Theorem relbrcnvg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 5721	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅
2	1	brrelex12i 5363	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
3	2	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)))
4		brrelex12 5360	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V))
5	4	ancomd 454	. . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
6	5	ex 402	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵𝑅𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)))
7		brcnvg 5506	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
8	7	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)))
9	3, 6, 8	pm5.21ndd 371	1 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 385   ∈ wcel 2157  Vcvv 3386   class class class wbr 4844  ^◡ccnv 5312  Rel wrel 5318

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1891  ax-4 1905  ax-5 2006  ax-6 2072  ax-7 2107  ax-9 2166  ax-10 2185  ax-11 2200  ax-12 2213  ax-13 2378  ax-ext 2778  ax-sep 4976  ax-nul 4984  ax-pr 5098

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 386  df-or 875  df-3an 1110  df-tru 1657  df-ex 1876  df-nf 1880  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2592  df-eu 2610  df-clab 2787  df-cleq 2793  df-clel 2796  df-nfc 2931  df-ral 3095  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3099  df-v 3388  df-dif 3773  df-un 3775  df-in 3777  df-ss 3784  df-nul 4117  df-if 4279  df-sn 4370  df-pr 4372  df-op 4376  df-br 4845  df-opab 4907  df-xp 5319  df-rel 5320  df-cnv 5321

This theorem is referenced by:  eliniseg2  5723  relbrcnv  5724  isinv  16733  releleccnv  34520  relcnveq2  34587  elrelscnveq2  34736  eqvrelsym  34840  brco2f1o  39107  brco3f1o  39108  ntrclsnvobr  39127  neicvgel1  39194