Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > relbrcnvg | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5760 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
relbrcnvg | ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relcnv 5981 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅 | |
2 | 1 | brrelex12i 5613 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
3 | 2 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
4 | brrelex12 5610 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V)) | |
5 | 4 | ancomd 465 | . . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
6 | 5 | ex 416 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵𝑅𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
7 | brcnvg 5757 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | |
8 | 7 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))) |
9 | 3, 6, 8 | pm5.21ndd 384 | 1 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 ∈ wcel 2111 Vcvv 3415 class class class wbr 5062 ◡ccnv 5559 Rel wrel 5565 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1976 ax-7 2016 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5201 ax-nul 5208 ax-pr 5331 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 848 df-3an 1091 df-tru 1546 df-fal 1556 df-ex 1788 df-sb 2072 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-ral 3067 df-rex 3068 df-rab 3071 df-v 3417 df-dif 3878 df-un 3880 df-in 3882 df-ss 3892 df-nul 4247 df-if 4449 df-sn 4551 df-pr 4553 df-op 4557 df-br 5063 df-opab 5125 df-xp 5566 df-rel 5567 df-cnv 5568 |
This theorem is referenced by: eliniseg2 5983 relbrcnv 5984 isinv 17278 releleccnv 36146 relcnveq2 36208 elrelscnveq2 36361 eqvrelsym 36468 brco2f1o 41334 brco3f1o 41335 ntrclsnvobr 41354 neicvgel1 41421 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |