![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > relbrcnvg | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5896 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
relbrcnvg | ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | relcnv 6125 | . . . 4 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅 | |
2 | 1 | brrelex12i 5744 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
3 | 2 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
4 | brrelex12 5741 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V)) | |
5 | 4 | ancomd 461 | . . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
6 | 5 | ex 412 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵𝑅𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))) |
7 | brcnvg 5893 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | |
8 | 7 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))) |
9 | 3, 6, 8 | pm5.21ndd 379 | 1 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∈ wcel 2106 Vcvv 3478 class class class wbr 5148 ◡ccnv 5688 Rel wrel 5694 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-ext 2706 ax-sep 5302 ax-nul 5312 ax-pr 5438 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1777 df-sb 2063 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2814 df-ral 3060 df-rex 3069 df-rab 3434 df-v 3480 df-dif 3966 df-un 3968 df-ss 3980 df-nul 4340 df-if 4532 df-sn 4632 df-pr 4634 df-op 4638 df-br 5149 df-opab 5211 df-xp 5695 df-rel 5696 df-cnv 5697 |
This theorem is referenced by: eliniseg2 6127 relbrcnv 6128 isinv 17808 releleccnv 38239 relcnveq2 38305 elrelscnveq2 38475 eqvrelsym 38587 brco2f1o 44022 brco3f1o 44023 ntrclsnvobr 44042 neicvgel1 44109 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |