| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wfis3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Well-Ordered Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| wfis3.1 | ⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴 |
| wfis3.2 | ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 |
| wfis3.3 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| wfis3.4 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| wfis3.5 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| wfis3 | ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | wfis3.4 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | wfis3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴 | |
| 3 | wfis3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 | |
| 4 | wfis3.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 5 | wfis3.5 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑)) | |
| 6 | 2, 3, 4, 5 | wfis2 6359 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) |
| 7 | 1, 6 | vtoclga 3536 | 1 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 = wceq 1569 ∈ wcel 2144 ∀wral 3076 Se wse 5601 We wwe 5602 Predcpred 6303 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1942 ax-6 1999 ax-7 2040 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 ax-10 2177 ax-11 2193 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5248 ax-pr 5390 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1812 df-nf 1816 df-sb 2099 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3739 df-ss 3896 df-dif 4047 df-in 4091 df-un 4151 df-nul 4279 df-if 4482 df-pw 4558 df-sn 4584 df-pr 4586 df-op 4590 df-br 5103 df-opab 5167 df-po 5558 df-so 5559 df-fr 5603 df-se 5604 df-we 5605 df-xp 5656 df-cnv 5658 df-dm 5660 df-rn 5661 df-res 5662 df-ima 5663 df-pred 6304 |
| This theorem is used by: omsinds 7898 uzsinds 14130 onsis 28660 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |