ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  df1st2 Unicode version

Theorem df1st2 6272
Description: An alternate possible definition of the  1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
df1st2  |-  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  z  =  x }  =  ( 1st  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )
Distinct variable group:    x, y, z

Proof of Theorem df1st2
Dummy variable  w is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 fo1st 6210 . . . . 5  |-  1st : _V -onto-> _V
2 fofn 5478 . . . . 5  |-  ( 1st
: _V -onto-> _V  ->  1st 
Fn  _V )
3 dffn5im 5602 . . . . 5  |-  ( 1st 
Fn  _V  ->  1st  =  ( w  e.  _V  |->  ( 1st `  w ) ) )
41, 2, 3mp2b 8 . . . 4  |-  1st  =  ( w  e.  _V  |->  ( 1st `  w ) )
5 mptv 4126 . . . 4  |-  ( w  e.  _V  |->  ( 1st `  w ) )  =  { <. w ,  z
>.  |  z  =  ( 1st `  w ) }
64, 5eqtri 2214 . . 3  |-  1st  =  { <. w ,  z
>.  |  z  =  ( 1st `  w ) }
76reseq1i 4938 . 2  |-  ( 1st  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )  =  ( { <. w ,  z
>.  |  z  =  ( 1st `  w ) }  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )
8 resopab 4986 . 2  |-  ( {
<. w ,  z >.  |  z  =  ( 1st `  w ) }  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )  =  { <. w ,  z >.  |  ( w  e.  ( _V  X.  _V )  /\  z  =  ( 1st `  w ) ) }
9 vex 2763 . . . . 5  |-  x  e. 
_V
10 vex 2763 . . . . 5  |-  y  e. 
_V
119, 10op1std 6201 . . . 4  |-  ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  ->  ( 1st `  w
)  =  x )
1211eqeq2d 2205 . . 3  |-  ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  ->  ( z  =  ( 1st `  w
)  <->  z  =  x ) )
1312dfoprab3 6244 . 2  |-  { <. w ,  z >.  |  ( w  e.  ( _V 
X.  _V )  /\  z  =  ( 1st `  w
) ) }  =  { <. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  |  z  =  x }
147, 8, 133eqtrri 2219 1  |-  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  z  =  x }  =  ( 1st  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 104    = wceq 1364    e. wcel 2164   _Vcvv 2760   <.cop 3621   {copab 4089    |-> cmpt 4090    X. cxp 4657    |` cres 4661    Fn wfn 5249   -onto->wfo 5252   ` cfv 5254   {coprab 5919   1stc1st 6191
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-fo 5260  df-fv 5262  df-oprab 5922  df-1st 6193  df-2nd 6194
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator