ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  df2nd2 Unicode version

Theorem df2nd2 6180
Description: An alternate possible definition of the  2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
df2nd2  |-  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  z  =  y }  =  ( 2nd  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )
Distinct variable group:    x, y, z

Proof of Theorem df2nd2
Dummy variable  w is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 fo2nd 6119 . . . . 5  |-  2nd : _V -onto-> _V
2 fofn 5407 . . . . 5  |-  ( 2nd
: _V -onto-> _V  ->  2nd 
Fn  _V )
3 dffn5im 5527 . . . . 5  |-  ( 2nd 
Fn  _V  ->  2nd  =  ( w  e.  _V  |->  ( 2nd `  w ) ) )
41, 2, 3mp2b 8 . . . 4  |-  2nd  =  ( w  e.  _V  |->  ( 2nd `  w ) )
5 mptv 4074 . . . 4  |-  ( w  e.  _V  |->  ( 2nd `  w ) )  =  { <. w ,  z
>.  |  z  =  ( 2nd `  w ) }
64, 5eqtri 2185 . . 3  |-  2nd  =  { <. w ,  z
>.  |  z  =  ( 2nd `  w ) }
76reseq1i 4875 . 2  |-  ( 2nd  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )  =  ( { <. w ,  z
>.  |  z  =  ( 2nd `  w ) }  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )
8 resopab 4923 . 2  |-  ( {
<. w ,  z >.  |  z  =  ( 2nd `  w ) }  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )  =  { <. w ,  z >.  |  ( w  e.  ( _V  X.  _V )  /\  z  =  ( 2nd `  w ) ) }
9 vex 2725 . . . . 5  |-  x  e. 
_V
10 vex 2725 . . . . 5  |-  y  e. 
_V
119, 10op2ndd 6110 . . . 4  |-  ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  ->  ( 2nd `  w
)  =  y )
1211eqeq2d 2176 . . 3  |-  ( w  =  <. x ,  y
>.  ->  ( z  =  ( 2nd `  w
)  <->  z  =  y ) )
1312dfoprab3 6152 . 2  |-  { <. w ,  z >.  |  ( w  e.  ( _V 
X.  _V )  /\  z  =  ( 2nd `  w
) ) }  =  { <. <. x ,  y
>. ,  z >.  |  z  =  y }
147, 8, 133eqtrri 2190 1  |-  { <. <.
x ,  y >. ,  z >.  |  z  =  y }  =  ( 2nd  |`  ( _V  X.  _V ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 103    = wceq 1342    e. wcel 2135   _Vcvv 2722   <.cop 3574   {copab 4037    |-> cmpt 4038    X. cxp 4597    |` cres 4601    Fn wfn 5178   -onto->wfo 5181   ` cfv 5183   {coprab 5838   2ndc2nd 6100
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1434  ax-7 1435  ax-gen 1436  ax-ie1 1480  ax-ie2 1481  ax-8 1491  ax-10 1492  ax-11 1493  ax-i12 1494  ax-bndl 1496  ax-4 1497  ax-17 1513  ax-i9 1517  ax-ial 1521  ax-i5r 1522  ax-13 2137  ax-14 2138  ax-ext 2146  ax-sep 4095  ax-pow 4148  ax-pr 4182  ax-un 4406
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 969  df-tru 1345  df-nf 1448  df-sb 1750  df-eu 2016  df-mo 2017  df-clab 2151  df-cleq 2157  df-clel 2160  df-nfc 2295  df-ral 2447  df-rex 2448  df-v 2724  df-sbc 2948  df-un 3116  df-in 3118  df-ss 3125  df-pw 3556  df-sn 3577  df-pr 3578  df-op 3580  df-uni 3785  df-br 3978  df-opab 4039  df-mpt 4040  df-id 4266  df-xp 4605  df-rel 4606  df-cnv 4607  df-co 4608  df-dm 4609  df-rn 4610  df-res 4611  df-iota 5148  df-fun 5185  df-fn 5186  df-f 5187  df-fo 5189  df-fv 5191  df-oprab 5841  df-1st 6101  df-2nd 6102
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator