Theorem dfoprab3 6019

Description: Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3.1	|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3	|- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, ph   ps, w   x, z, w, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( z, w)   ps( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab3s 6018	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps ) }
2		vex 2644	. . . . . 6 |- w e. _V
3		1stexg 5996	. . . . . 6 |- ( w e. _V -> ( 1st ` w ) e. _V )
4	2, 3	ax-mp 7	. . . . 5 |- ( 1st ` w ) e. _V
5		2ndexg 5997	. . . . . 6 |- ( w e. _V -> ( 2nd ` w ) e. _V )
6	2, 5	ax-mp 7	. . . . 5 |- ( 2nd ` w ) e. _V
7		eqcom 2102	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = ( 1st ` w ) <-> ( 1st ` w ) = x )
8		eqcom 2102	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( y = ( 2nd ` w ) <-> ( 2nd ` w ) = y )
9	7, 8	anbi12i 451	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) <-> ( ( 1st ` w ) = x /\ ( 2nd ` w ) = y ) )
10		eqopi 6000	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` w ) = x /\ ( 2nd ` w ) = y ) ) -> w = <. x , y >. )
11	9, 10	sylan2b 283	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) ) -> w = <. x , y >. )
12		dfoprab3.1	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
13	11, 12	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
14	13	bicomd 140	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) ) -> ( ps <-> ph ) )
15	14	ex 114	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( ( x = ( 1st ` w ) /\ y = ( 2nd ` w ) ) -> ( ps <-> ph ) ) )
16	4, 6, 15	sbc2iedv 2933	. . . 4 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps <-> ph ) )
17	16	pm5.32i 445	. . 3 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps ) <-> ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) )
18	17	opabbii 3935	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ps ) } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) }
19	1, 18	eqtr2i 2121	1 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1299   e. wcel 1448   _Vcvv 2641   [.wsbc 2862   <.cop 3477   {copab 3928   X. cxp 4475   ` cfv 5059   {coprab 5707   1stc1st 5967   2ndc2nd 5968

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 671  ax-5 1391  ax-7 1392  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-8 1450  ax-10 1451  ax-11 1452  ax-i12 1453  ax-bndl 1454  ax-4 1455  ax-13 1459  ax-14 1460  ax-17 1474  ax-i9 1478  ax-ial 1482  ax-i5r 1483  ax-ext 2082  ax-sep 3986  ax-pow 4038  ax-pr 4069  ax-un 4293

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 932  df-tru 1302  df-nf 1405  df-sb 1704  df-eu 1963  df-mo 1964  df-clab 2087  df-cleq 2093  df-clel 2096  df-nfc 2229  df-ral 2380  df-rex 2381  df-v 2643  df-sbc 2863  df-un 3025  df-in 3027  df-ss 3034  df-pw 3459  df-sn 3480  df-pr 3481  df-op 3483  df-uni 3684  df-br 3876  df-opab 3930  df-mpt 3931  df-id 4153  df-xp 4483  df-rel 4484  df-cnv 4485  df-co 4486  df-dm 4487  df-rn 4488  df-iota 5024  df-fun 5061  df-fn 5062  df-f 5063  df-fo 5065  df-fv 5067  df-oprab 5710  df-1st 5969  df-2nd 5970

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab4  6020  df1st2  6046  df2nd2  6047