Theorem dfoprab3s 6424

Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3s	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   ph, w   x, y, z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab2 6135	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
2		nfsbc1v 3070	. . . . 5 |- F/ x [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
3	2	19.41 1738	. . . 4 |- ( E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
4		sbcopeq1a 6421	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
5	4	pm5.32i 458	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
6	5	exbii 1658	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
7		nfcv 2392	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/_ y ( 1st ` w )
8		nfsbc1v 3070	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ y [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfsbc 3072	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
10	9	19.41 1738	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
11	6, 10	bitr3i 186	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
12	11	exbii 1658	. . . 4 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
13		elvv 4837	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) <-> E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. )
14	13	anbi1i 462	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
15	3, 12, 14	3bitr4i 212	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
16	15	opabbii 4198	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
17	1, 16	eqtri 2259	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1402   E.wex 1545   e. wcel 2209   _Vcvv 2821   [.wsbc 3051   <.cop 3712   {copab 4191   X. cxp 4772   ` cfv 5377   {coprab 6086   1stc1st 6372   2ndc2nd 6373

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fv 5385  df-oprab 6089  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375

This theorem is used by:  dfoprab3  6425