Theorem dfoprab3s 6096

Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3s	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   ph, w   x, y, z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab2 5826	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
2		nfsbc1v 2931	. . . . 5 |- F/ x [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
3	2	19.41 1665	. . . 4 |- ( E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
4		sbcopeq1a 6093	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
5	4	pm5.32i 450	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
6	5	exbii 1585	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
7		nfcv 2282	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/_ y ( 1st ` w )
8		nfsbc1v 2931	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ y [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
9	7, 8	nfsbc 2933	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph
10	9	19.41 1665	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
11	6, 10	bitr3i 185	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
12	11	exbii 1585	. . . 4 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
13		elvv 4609	. . . . 5 |- ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) <-> E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. )
14	13	anbi1i 454	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y w = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
15	3, 12, 14	3bitr4i 211	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) )
16	15	opabbii 4003	. 2 |- { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
17	1, 16	eqtri 2161	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1332   E.wex 1469   e. wcel 1481   _Vcvv 2689   [.wsbc 2913   <.cop 3535   {copab 3996   X. cxp 4545   ` cfv 5131   {coprab 5783   1stc1st 6044   2ndc2nd 6045

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-13 1492  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-sep 4054  ax-pow 4106  ax-pr 4139  ax-un 4363

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-eu 2003  df-mo 2004  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-v 2691  df-sbc 2914  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-uni 3745  df-br 3938  df-opab 3998  df-mpt 3999  df-id 4223  df-xp 4553  df-rel 4554  df-cnv 4555  df-co 4556  df-dm 4557  df-rn 4558  df-iota 5096  df-fun 5133  df-fv 5139  df-oprab 5786  df-1st 6046  df-2nd 6047

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  6097