Theorem dfoprab3s 6191

Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3s	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑤   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab2 5922	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2		nfsbc1v 2982	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
3	2	19.41 1686	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
4		sbcopeq1a 6188	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
5	4	pm5.32i 454	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1605	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7		nfcv 2319	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(1st ‘𝑤)
8		nfsbc1v 2982	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
9	7, 8	nfsbc 2984	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
10	9	19.41 1686	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
11	6, 10	bitr3i 186	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
12	11	exbii 1605	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
13		elvv 4689	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
14	13	anbi1i 458	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
15	3, 12, 14	3bitr4i 212	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
16	15	opabbii 4071	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
17	1, 16	eqtri 2198	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1353  ∃wex 1492   ∈ wcel 2148  Vcvv 2738  [wsbc 2963  ⟨cop 3596  {copab 4064   × cxp 4625  ‘cfv 5217  {coprab 5876  1^st c1st 6139  2^nd c2nd 6140

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4122  ax-pow 4175  ax-pr 4210  ax-un 4434

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-v 2740  df-sbc 2964  df-un 3134  df-in 3136  df-ss 3143  df-pw 3578  df-sn 3599  df-pr 3600  df-op 3602  df-uni 3811  df-br 4005  df-opab 4066  df-mpt 4067  df-id 4294  df-xp 4633  df-rel 4634  df-cnv 4635  df-co 4636  df-dm 4637  df-rn 4638  df-iota 5179  df-fun 5219  df-fv 5225  df-oprab 5879  df-1st 6141  df-2nd 6142

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  6192