ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  dfoprab3s GIF version

Theorem dfoprab3s 6190
Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
dfoprab3s {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑤   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfoprab2 5921 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2 nfsbc1v 2981 . . . . 5 𝑥[(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
3219.41 1686 . . . 4 (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
4 sbcopeq1a 6187 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑𝜑))
54pm5.32i 454 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
65exbii 1605 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7 nfcv 2319 . . . . . . . 8 𝑦(1st𝑤)
8 nfsbc1v 2981 . . . . . . . 8 𝑦[(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
97, 8nfsbc 2983 . . . . . . 7 𝑦[(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
10919.41 1686 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
116, 10bitr3i 186 . . . . 5 (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
1211exbii 1605 . . . 4 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
13 elvv 4688 . . . . 5 (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
1413anbi1i 458 . . . 4 ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
153, 12, 143bitr4i 212 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
1615opabbii 4070 . 2 {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
171, 16eqtri 2198 1 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 104   = wceq 1353  wex 1492  wcel 2148  Vcvv 2737  [wsbc 2962  cop 3595  {copab 4063   × cxp 4624  cfv 5216  {coprab 5875  1st c1st 6138  2nd c2nd 6139
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4121  ax-pow 4174  ax-pr 4209  ax-un 4433
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-v 2739  df-sbc 2963  df-un 3133  df-in 3135  df-ss 3142  df-pw 3577  df-sn 3598  df-pr 3599  df-op 3601  df-uni 3810  df-br 4004  df-opab 4065  df-mpt 4066  df-id 4293  df-xp 4632  df-rel 4633  df-cnv 4634  df-co 4635  df-dm 4636  df-rn 4637  df-iota 5178  df-fun 5218  df-fv 5224  df-oprab 5878  df-1st 6140  df-2nd 6141
This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  6191
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator