Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > dfoprab3s | GIF version |
Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfoprab3s | ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dfoprab2 5912 | . 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | nfsbc1v 2979 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 | |
3 | 2 | 19.41 1684 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
4 | sbcopeq1a 6178 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | |
5 | 4 | pm5.32i 454 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)) |
6 | 5 | exbii 1603 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)) |
7 | nfcv 2317 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(1st ‘𝑤) | |
8 | nfsbc1v 2979 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 | |
9 | 7, 8 | nfsbc 2981 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 |
10 | 9 | 19.41 1684 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
11 | 6, 10 | bitr3i 186 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
12 | 11 | exbii 1603 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
13 | elvv 4682 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) | |
14 | 13 | anbi1i 458 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
15 | 3, 12, 14 | 3bitr4i 212 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
16 | 15 | opabbii 4065 | . 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} |
17 | 1, 16 | eqtri 2196 | 1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1353 ∃wex 1490 ∈ wcel 2146 Vcvv 2735 [wsbc 2960 ⟨cop 3592 {copab 4058 × cxp 4618 ‘cfv 5208 {coprab 5866 1st c1st 6129 2nd c2nd 6130 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 709 ax-5 1445 ax-7 1446 ax-gen 1447 ax-ie1 1491 ax-ie2 1492 ax-8 1502 ax-10 1503 ax-11 1504 ax-i12 1505 ax-bndl 1507 ax-4 1508 ax-17 1524 ax-i9 1528 ax-ial 1532 ax-i5r 1533 ax-13 2148 ax-14 2149 ax-ext 2157 ax-sep 4116 ax-pow 4169 ax-pr 4203 ax-un 4427 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 980 df-tru 1356 df-nf 1459 df-sb 1761 df-eu 2027 df-mo 2028 df-clab 2162 df-cleq 2168 df-clel 2171 df-nfc 2306 df-ral 2458 df-rex 2459 df-v 2737 df-sbc 2961 df-un 3131 df-in 3133 df-ss 3140 df-pw 3574 df-sn 3595 df-pr 3596 df-op 3598 df-uni 3806 df-br 3999 df-opab 4060 df-mpt 4061 df-id 4287 df-xp 4626 df-rel 4627 df-cnv 4628 df-co 4629 df-dm 4630 df-rn 4631 df-iota 5170 df-fun 5210 df-fv 5216 df-oprab 5869 df-1st 6131 df-2nd 6132 |
This theorem is referenced by: dfoprab3 6182 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |