Theorem 0nelxp 4688

Description: The empty set is not a member of a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
0nelxp	⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 0nelxp

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		vex 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
3	1, 2	opnzi 4265	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ≠ ∅
4		simpl 109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
5	4	eqcomd 2199	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ∅)
6	5	necon3ai 2413	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ≠ ∅ → ¬ (∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
7	3, 6	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
8	7	nex 1511	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
9	8	nex 1511	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
10		elxp 4677	. 2 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	9, 10	mtbir 672	1 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364  ∃wex 1503   ∈ wcel 2164   ≠ wne 2364  ∅c0 3447  ⟨cop 3622   × cxp 4658

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4148  ax-pow 4204  ax-pr 4239

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-v 2762  df-dif 3156  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-nul 3448  df-pw 3604  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-op 3628  df-opab 4092  df-xp 4666

This theorem is referenced by:  0nelrel  4706  dmsn0  5134  nfunv  5288  reldmtpos  6308  dmtpos  6311  0ncn  7893  structcnvcnv  12637