Theorem 0nelxp 4639

Description: The empty set is not a member of a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
0nelxp	⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 0nelxp

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 2733	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		vex 2733	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
3	1, 2	opnzi 4220	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ≠ ∅
4		simpl 108	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
5	4	eqcomd 2176	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ∅)
6	5	necon3ai 2389	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ≠ ∅ → ¬ (∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
7	3, 6	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
8	7	nex 1493	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
9	8	nex 1493	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
10		elxp 4628	. 2 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	9, 10	mtbir 666	1 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1348  ∃wex 1485   ∈ wcel 2141   ≠ wne 2340  ∅c0 3414  ⟨cop 3586   × cxp 4609

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-14 2144  ax-ext 2152  ax-sep 4107  ax-pow 4160  ax-pr 4194

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 975  df-tru 1351  df-fal 1354  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-ne 2341  df-v 2732  df-dif 3123  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134  df-nul 3415  df-pw 3568  df-sn 3589  df-pr 3590  df-op 3592  df-opab 4051  df-xp 4617

This theorem is referenced by:  0nelrel  4657  dmsn0  5078  nfunv  5231  reldmtpos  6232  dmtpos  6235  0ncn  7793  structcnvcnv  12432