Theorem bnj66 35557

Description: Technical lemma for bnj60 35759. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj66.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj66.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj66.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj66	⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 → Rel 𝑔)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓   𝐵,𝑓,𝑔   𝑓,𝐺,𝑔   𝑅,𝑓   𝑔,𝑌   𝑓,𝑑,𝑔   𝑥,𝑓,𝑔

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑔, 𝑑)   𝐺(𝑥, 𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥, 𝑓, 𝑑)

Proof of Theorem bnj66

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj66.3	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
2		fneq1 6649	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ↔ 𝑓 Fn 𝑑))
3		fveq1 6904	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝑓‘𝑥))
4		reseq1 5974	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)) = (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5	4	opeq2d 4850	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩ = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)
6		bnj66.2	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
7	5, 6	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → ⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩ = 𝑌)
8	7	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) = (𝐺‘𝑌))
9	3, 8	eqeq12d 2779	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → ((𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) ↔ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))
10	9	ralbidv 3189	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌)))
11	2, 10	anbi12d 644	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → ((𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))))
12	11	rexbidv 3190	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝑓 → (∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))))
13	12	cbvabv 2834	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))} = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
14	1, 13	eqtr4i 2789	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩))}
15	14	bnj1436 35536	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)))
16		bnj1239 35502	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑔‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘⟨𝑥, (𝑔 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩)) → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 𝑔 Fn 𝑑)
17		fnrel 6660	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑔 Fn 𝑑 → Rel 𝑔)
18	17	rexlimivw 3163	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 𝑔 Fn 𝑑 → Rel 𝑔)
19	15, 16, 18	3syl 19	1 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 → Rel 𝑔)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {cab 2741  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090   ⊆ wss 3900  ⟨cop 4838   ↾ cres 5657  Rel wrel 5660   Fn wfn 6550  ‘cfv 6555   predc-bnj14 35386

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-res 5667  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-fv 6563

This theorem is used by:  bnj1321  35724