Theorem brttrcl 9670

Description: Characterization of elements of the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Aug-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brttrcl	⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑛,𝑓,𝑎   𝐵,𝑛,𝑓,𝑎   𝑅,𝑛,𝑓,𝑎

Proof of Theorem brttrcl

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relttrcl 9669	. . 3 ⊢ Rel t++𝑅
2	1	brrelex12i 5704	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
3		fvex 6882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓‘∅) ∈ V
4		eleq1 2852	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 → ((𝑓‘∅) ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V))
5	3, 4	mpbii 235	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
6		fvex 6882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓‘𝑛) ∈ V
7		eleq1 2852	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵 → ((𝑓‘𝑛) ∈ V ↔ 𝐵 ∈ V))
8	6, 7	mpbii 235	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
9	5, 8	anim12i 622	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
10	9	3ad2ant2 1148	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
11	10	exlimiv 1952	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
12	11	rexlimivw 3161	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
13		eqeq2 2776	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴))
14	13	anbi1d 640	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ↔ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦)))
15	14	3anbi2d 1464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ (𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))))
16	15	exbidv 1943	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))))
17	16	rexbidv 3188	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))))
18		eqeq2 2776	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵))
19	18	anbi2d 639	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ↔ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵)))
20	19	3anbi2d 1464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ (𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))))
21	20	exbidv 1943	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))))
22	21	rexbidv 3188	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))))
23		df-ttrcl 9665	. . 3 ⊢ t++𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))}
24	17, 22, 23	brabg 5512	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎))))
25	2, 12, 24	pm5.21nii 380	1 ⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1099   = wceq 1562  ∃wex 1801   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  Vcvv 3456   ∖ cdif 3903  ∅c0 4287   class class class wbr 5102  suc csuc 6350   Fn wfn 6518  ‘cfv 6523  ωcom 7848  1_oc1o 8432  t++cttrcl 9664

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-sb 2093  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-iota 6479  df-fv 6531  df-ttrcl 9665

This theorem is referenced by:  brttrcl2  9671  ssttrcl  9672  ttrcltr  9673