Theorem suc11 6432

Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suc11	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem suc11

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eloni 6333	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6343	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm3.13 997	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
4	1, 2, 3	3syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eqimss 3980	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵)
7		sucssel 6420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
8	6, 7	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
9		elsuci 6392	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
10	9	ord 865	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
11	10	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
12	8, 11	syl9 77	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
13		eqimss2 3981	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴)
14		sucssel 6420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
15	13, 14	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
16		elsuci 6392	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
17	16	ord 865	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐴))
18		eqcom 2743	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
19	17, 18	imbitrdi 251	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
20	19	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
21	15, 20	syl9 77	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
22	12, 21	jaao 957	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
23	5, 22	mpd 15	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24		suceq 6391	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
25	23, 24	impbid1 225	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 848   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ⊆ wss 3889  Ord word 6322  Oncon0 6323  suc csuc 6325

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-pr 5375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-tr 5193  df-eprel 5531  df-po 5539  df-so 5540  df-fr 5584  df-we 5586  df-ord 6326  df-on 6327  df-suc 6329

This theorem is referenced by:  peano4  7843  limenpsi  9090  fin1a2lem2  10323  ltsval2  27620  ltssolem1  27639  nosepnelem  27643  nolt02o  27659  bnj168  34873  onsuct0  36623  1oequni2o  37684  onsucf1lem  43697  onsucf1o  43700