MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  suc11 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem suc11 6467
Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
suc11 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem suc11
StepHypRef Expression
1 eloni 6367 . . . . 5 (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
2 ordn2lp 6377 . . . . 5 (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴))
3 pm3.13 1010 . . . . 5 (¬ (𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴))
41, 2, 33syl 19 . . . 4 (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴))
54adantr 486 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴))
6 eqimss 3989 . . . . . 6 (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵)
7 sucssel 6455 . . . . . 6 (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
86, 7syl5 35 . . . . 5 (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
9 elsuci 6427 . . . . . . 7 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
109ord 878 . . . . . 6 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (¬ 𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
1110com12 33 . . . . 5 𝐴𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
128, 11syl9 78 . . . 4 (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
13 eqimss2 3990 . . . . . 6 (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴)
14 sucssel 6455 . . . . . 6 (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
1513, 14syl5 35 . . . . 5 (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
16 elsuci 6427 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴))
1716ord 878 . . . . . . 7 (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴))
18 eqcom 2767 . . . . . . 7 (𝐵 = 𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵)
1917, 18imbitrdi 254 . . . . . 6 (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵))
2019com12 33 . . . . 5 𝐵𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵))
2115, 20syl9 78 . . . 4 (𝐵 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐵𝐴 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
2212, 21jaao 969 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
235, 22mpd 16 . 2 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
24 suceq 6426 . 2 (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
2523, 24impbid1 228 1 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401  wo 861   = wceq 1570  wcel 2145  wss 3899  Ord word 6356  Oncon0 6357  suc csuc 6359
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5398
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5213  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361  df-suc 6363
This theorem is used by:  peano4  7890  limenpsi  9153  fin1a2lem2  10406  ltsval2  27895  ltssolem1  27914  nosepnelem  27918  nolt02o  27934  bnj168  35243  onsuct0  37063  1oequni2o  38125  onsucf1lem  44113  onsucf1o  44116
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator