Theorem suc11 6415

Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suc11	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem suc11

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eloni 6316	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6326	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm3.13 996	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
4	1, 2, 3	3syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eqimss 3988	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵)
7		sucssel 6403	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
8	6, 7	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
9		elsuci 6375	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
10	9	ord 864	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
11	10	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
12	8, 11	syl9 77	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
13		eqimss2 3989	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴)
14		sucssel 6403	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
15	13, 14	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
16		elsuci 6375	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
17	16	ord 864	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐴))
18		eqcom 2738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
19	17, 18	imbitrdi 251	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
20	19	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
21	15, 20	syl9 77	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
22	12, 21	jaao 956	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
23	5, 22	mpd 15	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24		suceq 6374	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
25	23, 24	impbid1 225	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111   ⊆ wss 3897  Ord word 6305  Oncon0 6306  suc csuc 6308

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-pw 4549  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-tr 5197  df-eprel 5514  df-po 5522  df-so 5523  df-fr 5567  df-we 5569  df-ord 6309  df-on 6310  df-suc 6312

This theorem is referenced by:  peano4  7822  limenpsi  9065  fin1a2lem2  10292  sltval2  27595  sltsolem1  27614  nosepnelem  27618  nolt02o  27634  bnj168  34742  onsuct0  36485  1oequni2o  37412  onsucf1lem  43372  onsucf1o  43375