MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  suc11 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem suc11 6474
Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
suc11 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem suc11
StepHypRef Expression
1 eloni 6374 . . . . 5 (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
2 ordn2lp 6384 . . . . 5 (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴))
3 pm3.13 1010 . . . . 5 (¬ (𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴))
41, 2, 33syl 19 . . . 4 (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴))
54adantr 486 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴))
6 eqimss 3996 . . . . . 6 (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵)
7 sucssel 6462 . . . . . 6 (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
86, 7syl5 35 . . . . 5 (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
9 elsuci 6434 . . . . . . 7 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
109ord 878 . . . . . 6 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (¬ 𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
1110com12 33 . . . . 5 𝐴𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
128, 11syl9 78 . . . 4 (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴𝐵 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
13 eqimss2 3997 . . . . . 6 (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴)
14 sucssel 6462 . . . . . 6 (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
1513, 14syl5 35 . . . . 5 (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
16 elsuci 6434 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴))
1716ord 878 . . . . . . 7 (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵𝐴𝐵 = 𝐴))
18 eqcom 2772 . . . . . . 7 (𝐵 = 𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵)
1917, 18imbitrdi 254 . . . . . 6 (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵))
2019com12 33 . . . . 5 𝐵𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴𝐴 = 𝐵))
2115, 20syl9 78 . . . 4 (𝐵 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐵𝐴 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
2212, 21jaao 969 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((¬ 𝐴𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝐴) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵)))
235, 22mpd 16 . 2 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
24 suceq 6433 . 2 (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
2523, 24impbid1 228 1 ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401  wo 861   = wceq 1570  wcel 2146  wss 3906  Ord word 6363  Oncon0 6364  suc csuc 6366
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-pr 5406
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-tr 5221  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-suc 6370
This theorem is used by:  peano4  7895  limenpsi  9147  fin1a2lem2  10400  ltsval2  27873  ltssolem1  27892  nosepnelem  27896  nolt02o  27912  bnj168  35186  onsuct0  37011  1oequni2o  38073  onsucf1lem  44056  onsucf1o  44059
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator