MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ovig Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ovig 7566
Description: The value of an operation class abstraction (weak version). (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.) Remove unnecessary distinct variable conditions. (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ovig.1 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
ovig.2 ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)
ovig.3 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
Assertion
Ref Expression
ovig ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝜓 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovig
StepHypRef Expression
1 3simpa 1166 . 2 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆))
2 eleq1 2849 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅))
3 eleq1 2849 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆))
42, 3bi2anan9 650 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)))
543adant3 1150 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)))
6 ovig.1 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
75, 6anbi12d 644 . . 3 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜓)))
8 ovig.2 . . . 4 ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)
9 moanimv 2645 . . . 4 (∃*𝑧((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃*𝑧𝜑))
108, 9mpbir 234 . . 3 ∃*𝑧((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)
11 ovig.3 . . 3 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
127, 10, 11ovigg 7565 . 2 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶))
131, 12mpand 708 1 ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝜓 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = 𝐶))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃*wmo 2563  (class class class)co 7420  {coprab 7421
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-pr 5391
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424
This theorem is used by:  addsrpr  11160  mulsrpr  11161
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator