Theorem predep 6335

Description: The predecessor under the membership relation is equivalent to an intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
predep	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → Pred( E , 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑋))

Proof of Theorem predep

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-pred 6306	. 2 ⊢ Pred( E , 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ (◡ E “ {𝑋}))
2		relcnv 6108	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ◡ E
3		relimasn 6089	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel ◡ E → (◡ E “ {𝑋}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑋◡ E 𝑦})
4	2, 3	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝑋}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑋◡ E 𝑦}
5		brcnvg 5867	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V) → (𝑋◡ E 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 E 𝑋))
6	5	elvd 3463	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑋◡ E 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 E 𝑋))
7		epelg 5564	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑦 E 𝑋 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋))
8	6, 7	bitrd 282	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑋◡ E 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋))
9	8	eqabcdv 2899	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝑋◡ E 𝑦} = 𝑋)
10	4, 9	eqtrid 2812	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (◡ E “ {𝑋}) = 𝑋)
11	10	ineq2d 4173	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ (◡ E “ {𝑋})) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑋))
12	1, 11	eqtrid 2812	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → Pred( E , 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑋))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2743  Vcvv 3457   ∩ cin 3905  {csn 4591   class class class wbr 5111   E cep 5562  ^◡ccnv 5662   “ cima 5666  Rel wrel 5668  Predcpred 6305

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-eprel 5563  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-pred 6306

This theorem is used by:  trpred  6336