Theorem strfv2 17136

Description: A variation on strfv 17137 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfv2.s	⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
strfv2.f	⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
strfv2.e	⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
strfv2.n	⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strfv2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strfv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strfv2.e	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
2		strfv2.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
3	2	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 ∈ V)
4		strfv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
5	4	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → Fun ◡◡𝑆)
6		strfv2.n	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆
7	6	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)
8		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
9	1, 3, 5, 7, 8	strfv2d 17135	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  Vcvv 3475  ⟨cop 4635  ^◡ccnv 5676  Fun wfun 6538  ‘cfv 6544  Slot cslot 17114  ndxcnx 17126

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pr 5428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-res 5689  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fv 6552  df-slot 17115

This theorem is referenced by:  strfv  17137