Theorem strfv2 17237

Description: A variation on strfv 17238 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfv2.s	⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
strfv2.f	⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
strfv2.e	⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
strfv2.n	⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strfv2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strfv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strfv2.e	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
2		strfv2.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
3	2	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 ∈ V)
4		strfv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
5	4	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → Fun ◡◡𝑆)
6		strfv2.n	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆
7	6	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)
8		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
9	1, 3, 5, 7, 8	strfv2d 17236	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3478  ⟨cop 4637  ^◡ccnv 5688  Fun wfun 6557  ‘cfv 6563  Slot cslot 17215  ndxcnx 17227

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5583  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-res 5701  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fv 6571  df-slot 17216

This theorem is referenced by:  strfv  17238