P. 172 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 17101-17200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pcprmpw2 17101*	Self-referential expression for a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑛) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt 𝐴))))
Theorem	pcprmpw 17102*	Self-referential expression for a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑(𝑃 pCnt 𝐴))))
Theorem	dvdsprmpweq 17103*	If a positive integer divides a prime power, it is a prime power. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑁) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛)))
Theorem	dvdsprmpweqnn 17104*	If an integer greater than 1 divides a prime power, it is a (proper) prime power. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑁) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛)))
Theorem	dvdsprmpweqle 17105*	If a positive integer divides a prime power, it is a prime power with a smaller exponent. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝑃↑𝑁) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑛 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑃↑𝑛))))
Theorem	difsqpwdvds 17106	If the difference of two squares is a power of a prime, the prime divides twice the second squared number. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝐵 + 1) < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝐶↑𝐷) = ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐵↑2)) → 𝐶 ∥ (2 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	pcaddlem 17107	Lemma for pcadd 17108. The original numbers 𝐴 and 𝐵 have been decomposed using the prime count function as (𝑃↑𝑀) · (𝑅 / 𝑆) where 𝑅, 𝑆 are both not divisible by 𝑃 and 𝑀 = (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴), and similarly for 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((𝑃↑𝑀) · (𝑅 / 𝑆)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((𝑃↑𝑁) · (𝑇 / 𝑈)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ ℤ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ∥ 𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	pcadd 17108	An inequality for the prime count of a sum. This is the source of the ultrametric inequality for the p-adic metric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	pcadd2 17109	The inequality of pcadd 17108 becomes an equality when one of the factors has prime count strictly less than the other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) < (𝑃 pCnt 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt 𝐴) = (𝑃 pCnt (𝐴 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	pcmptcl 17110	Closure for the prime power map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:ℕ⟶ℕ ∧ seq1( · , 𝐹):ℕ⟶ℕ))
Theorem	pcmpt 17111*	Construct a function with given prime count characteristics. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑃 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)) = if(𝑃 ≤ 𝑁, 𝐵, 0))
Theorem	pcmpt2 17112*	Dividing two prime count maps yields a number with all dividing primes confined to an interval. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑃 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 pCnt ((seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀) / (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) = if((𝑃 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑁), 𝐵, 0))
Theorem	pcmptdvds 17113	The partial products of the prime power map form a divisibility chain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑𝐴), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℙ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ∥ (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑀))
Theorem	pcprod 17114*	The product of the primes taken to their respective powers reconstructs the original number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (𝑛↑(𝑛 pCnt 𝑁)), 1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (seq1( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = 𝑁)
Theorem	sumhash 17115*	The sum of 1 over a set is the size of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0) = (♯‘𝐴))
Theorem	fldivp1 17116	The difference between the floors of adjacent fractions is either 1 or 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Mar-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((⌊‘((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑁)) − (⌊‘(𝑀 / 𝑁))) = if(𝑁 ∥ (𝑀 + 1), 1, 0))
Theorem	pcfaclem 17117	Lemma for pcfac 17118. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑀))) = 0)
Theorem	pcfac 17118*	Calculate the prime count of a factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (!‘𝑁)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑀)(⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘))))
Theorem	pcbc 17119*	Calculate the prime count of a binomial coefficient. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑃 pCnt (𝑁C𝐾)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)((⌊‘(𝑁 / (𝑃↑𝑘))) − ((⌊‘((𝑁 − 𝐾) / (𝑃↑𝑘))) + (⌊‘(𝐾 / (𝑃↑𝑘))))))
Theorem	qexpz 17120	If a power of a rational number is an integer, then the number is an integer. In other words, all n-th roots are irrational unless they are integers (so that the original number is an n-th power). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℤ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	expnprm 17121	A second or higher power of a rational number is not a prime number. Or by contraposition, the n-th root of a prime number is irrational. Suggested by Norm Megill. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → ¬ (𝐴↑𝑁) ∈ ℙ)
Theorem	oddprmdvds 17122*	Every positive integer which is not a power of two is divisible by an odd prime number. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐾 = (2↑𝑛)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2})𝑝 ∥ 𝐾)
6.2.8  Pocklington's theorem
Theorem	prmpwdvds 17123	A relation involving divisibility by a prime power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑𝑁)) ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐾 · (𝑃↑(𝑁 − 1))))) → (𝑃↑𝑁) ∥ 𝐷)
Theorem	pockthlem 17124	Lemma for pockthg 17125. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑄)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 pCnt 𝐴) ≤ (𝑄 pCnt (𝑃 − 1)))
Theorem	pockthg 17125*	The generalized Pocklington's theorem. If 𝑁 − 1 = 𝐴 · 𝐵 where 𝐵 < 𝐴, then 𝑁 is prime if and only if for every prime factor 𝑝 of 𝐴, there is an 𝑥 such that 𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1) = 1( mod 𝑁) and gcd (𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝) − 1, 𝑁) = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 ∥ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ (((𝑥↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = 1 ∧ (((𝑥↑((𝑁 − 1) / 𝑝)) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)
Theorem	pockthi 17126	Pocklington's theorem, which gives a sufficient criterion for a number 𝑁 to be prime. This is the preferred method for verifying large primes, being much more efficient to compute than trial division. This form has been optimized for application to specific large primes; see pockthg 17125 for a more general closed-form version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐺 · 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑀 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐷 · (𝑃↑𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 < (𝑃↑𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝑀) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (((𝐴↑𝐺) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
6.2.9  Infinite primes theorem
Theorem	unbenlem 17127*	Lemma for unben 17128. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝐴 ≈ ω)
Theorem	unben 17128*	An unbounded set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)
Theorem	infpnlem1 17129*	Lemma for infpn 17131. The smallest divisor (greater than 1) 𝑀 of 𝑁! + 1 is a prime greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → (((1 < 𝑀 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((1 < 𝑗 ∧ (𝐾 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑗)) → (𝑁 < 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ ((𝑀 / 𝑗) ∈ ℕ → (𝑗 = 1 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑀)))))
Theorem	infpnlem2 17130*	Lemma for infpn 17131. For any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
⊢ 𝐾 = ((!‘𝑁) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗))))
Theorem	infpn 17131*	There exist infinitely many prime numbers: for any positive integer 𝑁, there exists a prime number 𝑗 greater than 𝑁. (See infpn2 17132 for the equinumerosity version.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ (𝑁 < 𝑗 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((𝑗 / 𝑘) ∈ ℕ → (𝑘 = 1 ∨ 𝑘 = 𝑗))))
Theorem	infpn2 17132*	There exist infinitely many prime numbers: the set of all primes 𝑆 is unbounded by infpn 17131, so by unben 17128 it is infinite. This is Metamath 100 proof #11. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (1 < 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑛 / 𝑚) ∈ ℕ → (𝑚 = 1 ∨ 𝑚 = 𝑛)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ≈ ℕ
Theorem	prmunb 17133*	The primes are unbounded. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ 𝑁 < 𝑝)
Theorem	prminf 17134	There are an infinite number of primes. Theorem 1.7 in [ApostolNT] p. 16. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ℙ ≈ ℕ
6.2.10  Sum of prime reciprocals
Theorem	prmreclem1 17135*	Lemma for prmrec 17141. Properties of the "square part" function, which extracts the 𝑚 of the decomposition 𝑁 = 𝑟𝑚↑2, with 𝑚 maximal and 𝑟 squarefree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ sup({𝑟 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑟↑2) ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑄‘𝑁) ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝑄‘𝑁)↑2) ∥ 𝑁 ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ¬ (𝐾↑2) ∥ (𝑁 / ((𝑄‘𝑁)↑2)))))
Theorem	prmreclem2 17136*	Lemma for prmrec 17141. There are at most 2↑𝐾 squarefree numbers which divide no primes larger than 𝐾. (We could strengthen this to 2↑♯(ℙ ∩ (1...𝐾)) but there's no reason to.) We establish the inequality by showing that the prime counts of the number up to 𝐾 completely determine it because all higher prime counts are zero, and they are all at most 1 because no square divides the number, so there are at most 2↑𝐾 possibilities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Timothy J. O'Malley, 9-Oct-2026.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ sup({𝑟 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑟↑2) ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ (𝑄‘𝑥) = 1}) ≤ (2↑𝐾))
Theorem	prmreclem3 17137*	Lemma for prmrec 17141. The main inequality established here is ♯𝑀 ≤ ♯{𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ (𝑄‘𝑥) = 1} · √𝑁, where {𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ (𝑄‘𝑥) = 1} is the set of squarefree numbers in 𝑀. This is demonstrated by the map 𝑦 ↦ ⟨𝑦 / (𝑄‘𝑦)↑2, (𝑄‘𝑦)⟩ where 𝑄‘𝑦 is the largest number whose square divides 𝑦. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ sup({𝑟 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑟↑2) ∥ 𝑛}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑀) ≤ ((2↑𝐾) · (√‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prmreclem4 17138*	Lemma for prmrec 17141. Show by induction that the indexed (nondisjoint) union 𝑊‘𝑘 is at most the size of the prime reciprocal series. The key counting lemma is hashdvds 16993, to show that the number of numbers in 1...𝑁 that divide 𝑘 is at most 𝑁 / 𝑘. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐾 + 1))if(𝑘 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑘), 0) < (1 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑝 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾) → (♯‘∪ 𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(𝑊‘𝑘)) ≤ (𝑁 · Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)if(𝑘 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑘), 0))))
Theorem	prmreclem5 17139*	Lemma for prmrec 17141. Here we show the inequality 𝑁 / 2 < ♯𝑀 by decomposing the set (1...𝑁) into the disjoint union of the set 𝑀 of those numbers that are not divisible by any "large" primes (above 𝐾) and the indexed union over 𝐾 < 𝑘 of the numbers 𝑊‘𝑘 that divide the prime 𝑘. By prmreclem4 17138 the second of these has size less than 𝑁 times the prime reciprocal series, which is less than 1 / 2 by assumption, we find that the complementary part 𝑀 must be at least 𝑁 / 2 large. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑝 ∈ (ℙ ∖ (1...𝐾)) ¬ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐾 + 1))if(𝑘 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑘), 0) < (1 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑝 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∣ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 / 2) < ((2↑𝐾) · (√‘𝑁)))
Theorem	prmreclem6 17140*	Lemma for prmrec 17141. If the series 𝐹 was convergent, there would be some 𝑘 such that the sum starting from 𝑘 + 1 sums to less than 1 / 2; this is a sufficient hypothesis for prmreclem5 17139 to produce the contradictory bound 𝑁 / 2 < (2↑𝑘)√𝑁, which is false for 𝑁 = 2↑(2𝑘 + 2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (1 / 𝑛), 0))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝
Theorem	prmrec 17141*	The sum of the reciprocals of the primes diverges. Theorem 1.13 in [ApostolNT] p. 18. This is the "second" proof at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_harmonic_series, attributed to Paul Erdős. This is Metamath 100 proof #81. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℙ ∩ (1...𝑛))(1 / 𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝
6.2.11  Fundamental theorem of arithmetic
Theorem	1arithlem1 17142*	Lemma for 1arith 17146. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁) = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑁)))
Theorem	1arithlem2 17143*	Lemma for 1arith 17146. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) → ((𝑀‘𝑁)‘𝑃) = (𝑃 pCnt 𝑁))
Theorem	1arithlem3 17144*	Lemma for 1arith 17146. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀‘𝑁):ℙ⟶ℕ0)
Theorem	1arithlem4 17145*	Lemma for 1arith 17146. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑦 ∈ ℙ, (𝑦↑(𝐹‘𝑦)), 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℙ⟶ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 𝑞)) → (𝐹‘𝑞) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝐹 = (𝑀‘𝑥))
Theorem	1arith 17146*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a sequence of prime exponents, for which only finitely many primes have nonzero exponent. The function 𝑀 maps the set of positive integers one-to-one onto the set of prime factorizations 𝑅. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀:ℕ⟶1-1onto𝑅
Theorem	1arith2 17147*	Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, where a prime factorization is represented as a finite monotonic 1-based sequence of primes. Every positive integer has a unique prime factorization. Theorem 1.10 in [ApostolNT] p. 17. This is Metamath 100 proof #80. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (𝑝 pCnt 𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑒 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℙ) ∣ (◡𝑒 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ∃!𝑔 ∈ 𝑅 (𝑀‘𝑧) = 𝑔
6.2.12  Lagrange's four-square theorem
Syntax	cgz 17148	Extend class notation with the set of gaussian integers.
class ℤ[i]
Definition	df-gz 17149	Define the set of gaussian integers, which are complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are integers. (Note that the [i] is actually part of the symbol token and has no independent meaning.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ℤ[i] = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((ℜ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝑥) ∈ ℤ)}
Theorem	elgz 17150	Elementhood in the gaussian integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (ℜ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ ∧ (ℑ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	gzcn 17151	A gaussian integer is a complex number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	zgz 17152	An integer is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	igz 17153	i is a gaussian integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ i ∈ ℤ[i]
Theorem	gznegcl 17154	The gaussian integers are closed under negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → -𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzcjcl 17155	The gaussian integers are closed under conjugation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → (∗‘𝐴) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzaddcl 17156	The gaussian integers are closed under addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzmulcl 17157	The gaussian integers are closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzreim 17158	Construct a gaussian integer from real and imaginary parts. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 + (i · 𝐵)) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzsubcl 17159	The gaussian integers are closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ[i])
Theorem	gzabssqcl 17160	The squared norm of a gaussian integer is an integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	4sqlem5 17161	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ))
Theorem	4sqlem6 17162	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -(𝑀 / 2) ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < (𝑀 / 2)))
Theorem	4sqlem7 17163	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵↑2) ≤ (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2))
Theorem	4sqlem8 17164	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐵↑2)))
Theorem	4sqlem9 17165	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐵↑2) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝐴↑2))
Theorem	4sqlem10 17166	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐵↑2)) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ ((𝐴↑2) − (((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2)))
Theorem	4sqlem1 17167*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. The set 𝑆 is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that 𝑆 = ℕ0; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ0
Theorem	4sqlem2 17168*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. Change bound variables in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2))))
Theorem	4sqlem3 17169*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. Sufficient condition to be in 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem4a 17170*	Lemma for 4sqlem4 17171. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i]) → (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem4 17171*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. We can express the four-square property more compactly in terms of gaussian integers, because the norms of gaussian integers are exactly sums of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] ∃𝑣 ∈ ℤ[i] 𝐴 = (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + ((abs‘𝑣)↑2)))
Theorem	mul4sqlem 17172*	Lemma for mul4sq 17173: algebraic manipulations. The extra assumptions involving 𝑀 are for a part of 4sqlem17 17180 which needs to know not just that the product is a sum of squares, but also that it preserves divisibility by 𝑀. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (((abs‘𝐴)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐵)↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (((abs‘𝐶)↑2) + ((abs‘𝐷)↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐶) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵 − 𝐷) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ[i])    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 / 𝑀) ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 / 𝑀) · (𝑌 / 𝑀)) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	mul4sq 17173*	Euler's four-square identity: The product of two sums of four squares is also a sum of four squares. This is usually quoted as an explicit formula involving eight real variables; we save some time by working with complex numbers (gaussian integers) instead, so that we only have to work with four variables, and also hiding the actual formula for the product in the proof of mul4sqlem 17172. (For the curious, the explicit formula that is used is ( ∣ 𝑎 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑏 ∣ ↑2)( ∣ 𝑐 ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑑 ∣ ↑2) = ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑐 + 𝑏 · 𝑑∗ ∣ ↑2 + ∣ 𝑎∗ · 𝑑 − 𝑏 · 𝑐∗ ∣ ↑2.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem11 17174*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. Use the pigeonhole principle to show that the sets {𝑚↑2 ∣ 𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)} and { -1 − 𝑛↑2 ∣ 𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)} have a common element, mod 𝑃. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	4sqlem12 17175*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. For any odd prime 𝑃, there is a 𝑘 < 𝑃 such that 𝑘𝑃 − 1 is a sum of two squares. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))∃𝑢 ∈ ℤ[i] (((abs‘𝑢)↑2) + 1) = (𝑘 · 𝑃))
Theorem	4sqlem13 17176*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑀 < 𝑃))
Theorem	4sqlem14 17177*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	4sqlem15 17178*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → ((((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐸↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐹↑2)) = 0) ∧ (((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐺↑2)) = 0 ∧ ((((𝑀↑2) / 2) / 2) − (𝐻↑2)) = 0)))
Theorem	4sqlem16 17179*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ ((𝑅 = 0 ∨ 𝑅 = 𝑀) → (𝑀↑2) ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑃))))
Theorem	4sqlem17 17180*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (((𝐴 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (((𝐵 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (((𝐶 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐷 + (𝑀 / 2)) mod 𝑀) − (𝑀 / 2))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((((𝐸↑2) + (𝐹↑2)) + ((𝐺↑2) + (𝐻↑2))) / 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 · 𝑃) = (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) + ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))))    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	4sqlem18 17181*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. Inductive step, odd prime case. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.) (Revised by AV, 14-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ((2 · 𝑁) + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0...(2 · 𝑁)) ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑖 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑖 · 𝑃) ∈ 𝑆}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = inf(𝑇, ℝ, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	4sqlem19 17182*	Lemma for 4sq 17183. The proof is by strong induction - we show that if all the integers less than 𝑘 are in 𝑆, then 𝑘 is as well. In this part of the proof we do the induction argument and dispense with all the cases except the odd prime case, which is sent to 4sqlem18 17181. If 𝑘 is 0, 1, 2, we show 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 directly; otherwise if 𝑘 is composite, 𝑘 is the product of two numbers less than it (and hence in 𝑆 by assumption), so by mul4sq 17173 𝑘 ∈ 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ℕ0 = 𝑆
Theorem	4sq 17183*	Lagrange's four-square theorem, or Bachet's conjecture: every nonnegative integer is expressible as a sum of four squares. This is Metamath 100 proof #19. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℤ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) + ((𝑐↑2) + (𝑑↑2))))
6.2.13  Van der Waerden's theorem
Syntax	cvdwa 17184	The arithmetic progression function.
class AP
Syntax	cvdwm 17185	The monochromatic arithmetic progression predicate.
class MonoAP
Syntax	cvdwp 17186	The polychromatic arithmetic progression predicate.
class PolyAP
Definition	df-vdwap 17187*	Define the arithmetic progression function, which takes as input a length 𝑘, a start point 𝑎, and a step 𝑑 and outputs the set of points in this progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ AP = (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ ℕ, 𝑑 ∈ ℕ ↦ ran (𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑘 − 1)) ↦ (𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)))))
Definition	df-vdwmc 17188*	Define the "contains a monochromatic AP" predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ MonoAP = {⟨𝑘, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐(ran (AP‘𝑘) ∩ 𝒫 (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})) ≠ ∅}
Definition	df-vdwpc 17189*	Define the "contains a polychromatic collection of APs" predicate. See vdwpc 17199 for more information. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ PolyAP = {⟨⟨𝑚, 𝑘⟩, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℕ ↑m (1...𝑚))(∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑚)((𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))(AP‘𝑘)(𝑑‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {(𝑓‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖)))}) ∧ (♯‘ran (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑚) ↦ (𝑓‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))))) = 𝑚)}
Theorem	vdwapfval 17190*	Define the arithmetic progression function, which takes as input a length 𝑘, a start point 𝑎, and a step 𝑑 and outputs the set of points in this progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 → (AP‘𝐾) = (𝑎 ∈ ℕ, 𝑑 ∈ ℕ ↦ ran (𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1)) ↦ (𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)))))
Theorem	vdwapf 17191	The arithmetic progression function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 → (AP‘𝐾):(ℕ × ℕ)⟶𝒫 ℕ)
Theorem	vdwapval 17192*	Value of the arithmetic progression function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))𝑋 = (𝐴 + (𝑚 · 𝐷))))
Theorem	vdwapun 17193	Remove the first element of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘(𝐾 + 1))𝐷) = ({𝐴} ∪ ((𝐴 + 𝐷)(AP‘𝐾)𝐷)))
Theorem	vdwapid1 17194	The first element of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴(AP‘𝐾)𝐷))
Theorem	vdwap0 17195	Value of a length-1 arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘0)𝐷) = ∅)
Theorem	vdwap1 17196	Value of a length-1 arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴(AP‘1)𝐷) = {𝐴})
Theorem	vdwmc 17197*	The predicate " The ⟨𝑅, 𝑁⟩-coloring 𝐹 contains a monochromatic AP of length 𝐾". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑐∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ (𝑎(AP‘𝐾)𝑑) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})))
Theorem	vdwmc2 17198*	Expand out the definition of an arithmetic progression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 MonoAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))(𝑎 + (𝑚 · 𝑑)) ∈ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑐})))
Theorem	vdwpc 17199*	The predicate " The coloring 𝐹 contains a polychromatic 𝑀-tuple of AP's of length 𝐾". A polychromatic 𝑀-tuple of AP's is a set of AP's with the same base point but different step lengths, such that each individual AP is monochromatic, but the AP's all have mutually distinct colors. (The common basepoint is not required to have the same color as any of the AP's.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (1...𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑀, 𝐾⟩ PolyAP 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℕ ↑m 𝐽)(∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐽 ((𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝑑‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖)))}) ∧ (♯‘ran (𝑖 ∈ 𝐽 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑎 + (𝑑‘𝑖))))) = 𝑀)))
Theorem	vdwlem1 17200*	Lemma for vdw 17213. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑊)⟶𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷:(1...𝑀)⟶ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑀)((𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝑖))(AP‘𝐾)(𝐷‘𝑖)) ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐹‘(𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝑖)))}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘(𝐴 + (𝐷‘𝐼))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 + 1) MonoAP 𝐹)