P. 172 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 17101-17200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	prmgaplem4 17101*	Lemma for prmgap 17106. (Contributed by AV, 10-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∣ (𝑁 < 𝑝 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑃)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 < 𝑃) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	prmgaplem5 17102*	Lemma for prmgap 17106: for each integer greater than 2 there is a smaller prime closest to this integer, i.e. there is a smaller prime and no other prime is between this prime and the integer. (Contributed by AV, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 < 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑝 + 1)..^𝑁)𝑧 ∉ ℙ))
Theorem	prmgaplem6 17103*	Lemma for prmgap 17106: for each positive integer there is a greater prime closest to this integer, i.e. there is a greater prime and no other prime is between this prime and the integer. (Contributed by AV, 10-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ (𝑁 < 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1)..^𝑝)𝑧 ∉ ℙ))
Theorem	prmgaplem7 17104*	Lemma for prmgap 17106. (Contributed by AV, 12-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℕ ↑m ℕ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (2...𝑁)1 < (((𝐹‘𝑁) + 𝑖) gcd 𝑖))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑝 < ((𝐹‘𝑁) + 2) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑁) + 𝑁) < 𝑞 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑝 + 1)..^𝑞)𝑧 ∉ ℙ))
Theorem	prmgaplem8 17105*	Lemma for prmgap 17106. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℕ ↑m ℕ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (2...𝑁)1 < (((𝐹‘𝑁) + 𝑖) gcd 𝑖))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑁 ≤ (𝑞 − 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑝 + 1)..^𝑞)𝑧 ∉ ℙ))
Theorem	prmgap 17106*	The prime gap theorem: for each positive integer there are (at least) two successive primes with a difference ("gap") at least as big as the given integer. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑛 ≤ (𝑞 − 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑝 + 1)..^𝑞)𝑧 ∉ ℙ)
Theorem	prmgaplcm 17107*	Alternate proof of prmgap 17106: in contrast to prmgap 17106, where the gap starts at n! , the factorial of n, the gap starts at the least common multiple of all positive integers less than or equal to n. (Contributed by AV, 13-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 27-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑛 ≤ (𝑞 − 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑝 + 1)..^𝑞)𝑧 ∉ ℙ)
Theorem	prmgapprmolem 17108	Lemma for prmgapprmo 17109: The primorial of a number plus an integer greater than 1 and less then or equal to the number are not coprime. (Contributed by AV, 15-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 29-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (2...𝑁)) → 1 < (((#p‘𝑁) + 𝐼) gcd 𝐼))
Theorem	prmgapprmo 17109*	Alternate proof of prmgap 17106: in contrast to prmgap 17106, where the gap starts at n! , the factorial of n, the gap starts at n#, the primorial of n. (Contributed by AV, 15-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 29-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ (𝑛 ≤ (𝑞 − 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑝 + 1)..^𝑞)𝑧 ∉ ℙ)
6.2.17  Decimal arithmetic (cont.)
Theorem	dec2dvds 17110	Divisibility by two is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐵 · 2) = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐶 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ ;𝐴𝐷
Theorem	dec5dvds 17111	Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 < 5    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ ;𝐴𝐵
Theorem	dec5dvds2 17112	Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 < 5    &   ⊢ (5 + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ ;𝐴𝐶
Theorem	dec5nprm 17113	Divisibility by five is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ ;𝐴5 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	dec2nprm 17114	Divisibility by two is obvious in base 10. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐵 · 2) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ ;𝐴𝐶 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	modxai 17115	Add exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐶) mod 𝑁) = (𝐿 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐶) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	mod2xi 17116	Double exponents in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (2 · 𝐵) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	modxp1i 17117	Add one to an exponent in a power mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 + 1) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	mod2xnegi 17118	Version of mod2xi 17116 with a negative mod value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝐿 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (2 · 𝐵) = 𝐸    &   ⊢ (𝐿 + 𝐾) = 𝑁    &   ⊢ ((𝐷 · 𝑁) + 𝑀) = (𝐾 · 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝐸) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	modsubi 17119	Subtract from within a mod calculation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 mod 𝑁) = (𝐾 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝑀 + 𝐵) = 𝐾    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) mod 𝑁) = (𝑀 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	gcdi 17120	Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 𝐺    &   ⊢ ((𝐾 · 𝑁) + 𝑅) = 𝑀    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺
Theorem	gcdmodi 17121	Calculate a GCD via Euclid's algorithm. Theorem 5.6 in [ApostolNT] p. 109. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ (𝐾 mod 𝑁) = (𝑅 mod 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝑁 gcd 𝑅) = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 gcd 𝑁) = 𝐺
Theorem	decexp2 17122	Calculate a power of two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑀 + 2) = 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ ((4 · (2↑𝑀)) + 0) = (2↑𝑁)
Theorem	numexp0 17123	Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴↑0) = 1
Theorem	numexp1 17124	Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴↑1) = 𝐴
Theorem	numexpp1 17125	Calculate an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑀 + 1) = 𝑁    &   ⊢ ((𝐴↑𝑀) · 𝐴) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐶
Theorem	numexp2x 17126	Double an integer power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (2 · 𝑀) = 𝑁    &   ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑀) = 𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝐷 · 𝐷) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴↑𝑁) = 𝐶
Theorem	decsplit0b 17127	Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: 𝑁 = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑0)) + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐵)
Theorem	decsplit0 17128	Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: 𝑁 = 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑0)) + 0) = 𝐴
Theorem	decsplit1 17129	Split a decimal number into two parts. Base case: 𝑁 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑1)) + 𝐵) = ;𝐴𝐵
Theorem	decsplit 17130	Split a decimal number into two parts. Inductive step. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑀 + 1) = 𝑁    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝐵) = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑𝑁)) + ;𝐵𝐷) = ;𝐶𝐷
Theorem	karatsuba 17131	The Karatsuba multiplication algorithm. If 𝑋 and 𝑌 are decomposed into two groups of digits of length 𝑀 (only the lower group is known to be this size but the algorithm is most efficient when the partition is chosen near the middle of the digit string), then 𝑋𝑌 can be written in three groups of digits, where each group needs only one multiplication. Thus, we can halve both inputs with only three multiplications on the smaller operands, yielding an asymptotic improvement of n^(log2 3) instead of n^2 for the "naive" algorithm decmul1c 12823. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐶) = 𝑅    &   ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐷) = 𝑇    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · (𝐶 + 𝐷)) = ((𝑅 + 𝑆) + 𝑇)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝐵) = 𝑋    &   ⊢ ((𝐶 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝐷) = 𝑌    &   ⊢ ((𝑅 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝑆) = 𝑊    &   ⊢ ((𝑊 · (;10↑𝑀)) + 𝑇) = 𝑍    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 · 𝑌) = 𝑍
Theorem	2exp4 17132	Two to the fourth power is 16. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (2↑4) = ;16
Theorem	2exp5 17133	Two to the fifth power is 32. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (2↑5) = ;32
Theorem	2exp6 17134	Two to the sixth power is 64. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (2↑6) = ;64
Theorem	2exp7 17135	Two to the seventh power is 128. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (2↑7) = ;;128
Theorem	2exp8 17136	Two to the eighth power is 256. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (2↑8) = ;;256
Theorem	2exp11 17137	Two to the eleventh power is 2048. (Contributed by AV, 16-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (2↑;11) = ;;;2048
Theorem	2exp16 17138	Two to the sixteenth power is 65536. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (2↑;16) = ;;;;65536
Theorem	3exp3 17139	Three to the third power is 27. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (3↑3) = ;27
Theorem	2expltfac 17140	The factorial grows faster than two to the power 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) → (2↑𝑁) < (!‘𝑁))
6.2.18  Cyclical shifts of words (cont.)
Theorem	cshwsidrepsw 17141	If cyclically shifting a word of length being a prime number by a number of positions which is not divisible by the prime number results in the word itself, the word is a "repeated symbol word". (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ) → ((𝐿 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐿 mod (♯‘𝑊)) ≠ 0 ∧ (𝑊 cyclShift 𝐿) = 𝑊) → 𝑊 = ((𝑊‘0) repeatS (♯‘𝑊))))
Theorem	cshwsidrepswmod0 17142	If cyclically shifting a word of length being a prime number results in the word itself, the shift must be either by 0 (modulo the length of the word) or the word must be a "repeated symbol word". (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑊 cyclShift 𝐿) = 𝑊 → ((𝐿 mod (♯‘𝑊)) = 0 ∨ 𝑊 = ((𝑊‘0) repeatS (♯‘𝑊)))))
Theorem	cshwshashlem1 17143*	If cyclically shifting a word of length being a prime number not consisting of identical symbols by at least one position (and not by as many positions as the length of the word), the result will not be the word itself. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0) ∧ 𝐿 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝐿) ≠ 𝑊)
Theorem	cshwshashlem2 17144*	If cyclically shifting a word of length being a prime number and not of identical symbols by different numbers of positions, the resulting words are different. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0)) → ((𝐿 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)) ∧ 𝐾 < 𝐿) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝐿) ≠ (𝑊 cyclShift 𝐾)))
Theorem	cshwshashlem3 17145*	If cyclically shifting a word of length being a prime number and not of identical symbols by different numbers of positions, the resulting words are different. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0)) → ((𝐿 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)) ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝐿) ≠ (𝑊 cyclShift 𝐾)))
Theorem	cshwsdisj 17146*	The singletons resulting by cyclically shifting a given word of length being a prime number and not consisting of identical symbols is a disjoint collection. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0)) → Disj 𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)){(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛)})
Theorem	cshwsiun 17147*	The set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting a given word is an indexed union. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 → 𝑀 = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊)){(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛)})
Theorem	cshwsex 17148*	The class of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting a given word is a set. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
Theorem	cshws0 17149*	The size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting an empty word is 0. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 = ∅ → (♯‘𝑀) = 0)
Theorem	cshwrepswhash1 17150*	The size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting a nonempty "repeated symbol word" is 1. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑊 = (𝐴 repeatS 𝑁)) → (♯‘𝑀) = 1)
Theorem	cshwshashnsame 17151*	If a word (not consisting of identical symbols) has a length being a prime number, the size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting the original word equals the length of the original word. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ) → (∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0) → (♯‘𝑀) = (♯‘𝑊)))
Theorem	cshwshash 17152*	If a word has a length being a prime number, the size of the set of (different!) words resulting by cyclically shifting the original word equals the length of the original word or 1. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Nov-2018.)
⊢ 𝑀 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛) = 𝑤}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (♯‘𝑊) ∈ ℙ) → ((♯‘𝑀) = (♯‘𝑊) ∨ (♯‘𝑀) = 1))
6.2.19  Specific prime numbers
Theorem	prmlem0 17153*	Lemma for prmlem1 17155 and prmlem2 17167. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℙ → ¬ 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝐾 + 2) = 𝑀    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))
Theorem	prmlem1a 17154*	A quick proof skeleton to show that the numbers less than 25 are prime, by trial division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ((¬ 2 ∥ 5 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘5)) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ (𝑥↑2) ≤ 𝑁) → ¬ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmlem1 17155	A quick proof skeleton to show that the numbers less than 25 are prime, by trial division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 < ;25    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	5prm 17156	5 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 5 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	6nprm 17157	6 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 6 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	7prm 17158	7 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 7 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	8nprm 17159	8 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 8 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	9nprm 17160	9 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ¬ 9 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	10nprm 17161	10 is not a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 6-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ¬ ;10 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	11prm 17162	11 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;11 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	13prm 17163	13 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;13 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	17prm 17164	17 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;17 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	19prm 17165	19 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;19 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	23prm 17166	23 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;23 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmlem2 17167	Our last proving session got as far as 25 because we started with the two "bootstrap" primes 2 and 3, and the next prime is 5, so knowing that 2 and 3 are prime and 4 is not allows to cover the numbers less than 5↑2 = 25. Additionally, nonprimes are "easy", so we can extend this range of known prime/nonprimes all the way until 29, which is the first prime larger than 25. Thus, in this lemma we extend another blanket out to 29↑2 = 841, from which we can prove even more primes. If we wanted, we could keep doing this, but the goal is Bertrand's postulate, and for that we only need a few large primes - we don't need to find them all, as we have been doing thus far. So after this blanket runs out, we'll have to switch to another method (see 1259prm 17183). As a side note, you can see the pattern of the primes in the indentation pattern of this lemma! (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝑁 < ;;841    &   ⊢ 1 < 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 3 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 5 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ 7 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;11 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;13 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;17 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;19 ∥ 𝑁    &   ⊢ ¬ ;23 ∥ 𝑁    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	37prm 17168	37 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;37 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	43prm 17169	43 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;43 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	83prm 17170	83 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;83 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	139prm 17171	139 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;139 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	163prm 17172	163 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;163 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	317prm 17173	317 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;317 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	631prm 17174	631 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ;;631 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	prmo4 17175	The primorial of 4. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘4) = 6
Theorem	prmo5 17176	The primorial of 5. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘5) = ;30
Theorem	prmo6 17177	The primorial of 6. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (#p‘6) = ;30
6.2.20  Very large primes
Theorem	1259lem1 17178	Lemma for 1259prm 17183. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑16 = 52𝑁 + 68≡68 and 2↑17≡68 · 2 = 136 in this lemma. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;17) mod 𝑁) = (;;136 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem2 17179	Lemma for 1259prm 17183. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑34 = (2↑17)↑2≡136↑2≡14𝑁 + 870. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;34) mod 𝑁) = (;;870 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem3 17180	Lemma for 1259prm 17183. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑38 = 2↑34 · 2↑4≡870 · 16 = 11𝑁 + 71 and 2↑76 = (2↑34)↑2≡71↑2 = 4𝑁 + 5≡5. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;76) mod 𝑁) = (5 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem4 17181	Lemma for 1259prm 17183. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑306 = (2↑76)↑4 · 4≡5↑4 · 4 = 2𝑁 − 18, 2↑612 = (2↑306)↑2≡18↑2 = 324, 2↑629 = 2↑612 · 2↑17≡324 · 136 = 35𝑁 − 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑629)↑2≡1↑2 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	1259lem5 17182	Lemma for 1259prm 17183. Calculate the GCD of 2↑34 − 1≡869 with 𝑁 = 1259. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;34) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	1259prm 17183	1259 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;1259    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	2503lem1 17184	Lemma for 2503prm 17187. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑18 = 512↑2 = 104𝑁 + 1832≡1832. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;18) mod 𝑁) = (;;;1832 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	2503lem2 17185	Lemma for 2503prm 17187. Calculate a power mod. We calculate 2↑19 = 2↑18 · 2≡1832 · 2 = 𝑁 + 1161, 2↑38 = (2↑19)↑2≡1161↑2 = 538𝑁 + 1307, 2↑39 = 2↑38 · 2≡1307 · 2 = 𝑁 + 111, 2↑78 = (2↑39)↑2≡111↑2 = 5𝑁 − 194, 2↑156 = (2↑78)↑2≡194↑2 = 15𝑁 + 91, 2↑312 = (2↑156)↑2≡91↑2 = 3𝑁 + 772, 2↑624 = (2↑312)↑2≡772↑2 = 238𝑁 + 270, 2↑1248 = (2↑624)↑2≡270↑2 = 29𝑁 + 313, 2↑1251 = 2↑1248 · 8≡313 · 8 = 𝑁 + 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑1251)↑2≡1↑2 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	2503lem3 17186	Lemma for 2503prm 17187. Calculate the GCD of 2↑18 − 1≡1831 with 𝑁 = 2503. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;18) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	2503prm 17187	2503 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;2503    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
Theorem	4001lem1 17188	Lemma for 4001prm 17192. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑12 = 4096 = 𝑁 + 95, 2↑24 = (2↑12)↑2≡95↑2 = 2𝑁 + 1023, 2↑25 = 2↑24 · 2≡1023 · 2 = 2046, 2↑50 = (2↑25)↑2≡2046↑2 = 1046𝑁 + 1070, 2↑100 = (2↑50)↑2≡1070↑2 = 286𝑁 + 614 and 2↑200 = (2↑100)↑2≡614↑2 = 94𝑁 + 902 ≡902. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;;200) mod 𝑁) = (;;902 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem2 17189	Lemma for 4001prm 17192. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑400 = (2↑200)↑2≡902↑2 = 203𝑁 + 1401 and 2↑800 = (2↑400)↑2≡1401↑2 = 490𝑁 + 2311 ≡2311. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑;;800) mod 𝑁) = (;;;2311 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem3 17190	Lemma for 4001prm 17192. Calculate a power mod. In decimal, we calculate 2↑1000 = 2↑800 · 2↑200≡2311 · 902 = 521𝑁 + 1 and finally 2↑(𝑁 − 1) = (2↑1000)↑4≡1↑4 = 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ ((2↑(𝑁 − 1)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁)
Theorem	4001lem4 17191	Lemma for 4001prm 17192. Calculate the GCD of 2↑800 − 1≡2310 with 𝑁 = 4001. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ (((2↑;;800) − 1) gcd 𝑁) = 1
Theorem	4001prm 17192	4001 is a prime number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ;;;4001    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ
PART 7  BASIC STRUCTURES
7.1  Extensible structures
7.1.1  Basic definitions An "extensible structure" (or "structure" in short, at least in this section) is used to define a specific group, ring, poset, and so on. An extensible structure can contain many components. For example, a group will have at least two components (base set and operation), although it can be further specialized by adding other components such as a multiplicative operation for rings (and still remain a group per our definition). Thus, every ring is also a group. This extensible structure approach allows theorems from more general structures (such as groups) to be reused for more specialized structures (such as rings) without having to reprove anything. Structures are common in mathematics, but in informal (natural language) proofs the details are assumed in ways that we must make explicit. An extensible structure is implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs) on a finite (and not necessarily sequential) subset of ℕ. The function's argument is the index of a structure component (such as 1 for the base set of a group), and its value is the component (such as the base set). By convention, we normally avoid direct reference to the hard-coded numeric index and instead use structure component extractors such as ndxid 17244 and strfv 17251. Using extractors makes it easier to change numeric indices and also makes the components' purpose clearer. For example, as noted in ndxid 17244, we can refer to a specific poset with base set 𝐵 and order relation 𝐿 using the extensible structure {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), 𝐿⟩} rather than {⟨1, 𝐵⟩, ⟨;10, 𝐿⟩}. See section header comment mmtheorems.html#cnx 17244 for more details on numeric indices versus the structure component extractors. There are many other possible ways to handle structures. We chose this extensible structure approach because this approach (1) results in simpler notation than other approaches we are aware of, and (2) is easier to do proofs with. We cannot use an approach that uses "hidden" arguments; Metamath does not support hidden arguments, and in any case we want nothing hidden. It would be possible to use a categorical approach (e.g., something vaguely similar to Lean's mathlib). However, instances (the chain of proofs that an 𝑋 is a 𝑌 via a bunch of forgetful functors) can cause serious performance problems for automated tooling, and the resulting proofs would be painful to look at directly (in the case of Lean, they are long past the level where people would find it acceptable to look at them directly). Metamath is working under much stricter conditions than this, and it has still managed to achieve about the same level of flexibility through this "extensible structure" approach. To create a substructure of a given extensible structure, you can simply use the multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures ↾s as defined in df-ress 17288. This can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while leaving operators alone. Individual kinds of structures will need to handle this behavior by ignoring operators' values outside the range (like Ring), defining a function using the base set and applying that (like TopGrp), or explicitly truncating the slot before use (like MetSp). For example, the unital ring of integers ℤring is defined in df-zring 21481 as simply ℤring = (ℂfld ↾s ℤ). This can be similarly done for all other subsets of ℂ, which has all the structure we can show applies to it, and this all comes "for free". Should we come up with some new structure in the future that we wish ℂ to inherit, then we change the definition of ℂfld, reprove all the slot extraction theorems, add a new one, and that's it. None of the other downstream theorems have to change. Note that the construct of df-prds 17507 addresses a different situation. It is not possible to have SubGrp and SubRing be the same thing because they produce different outputs on the same input. The subgroups of an extensible structure treated as a group are not the same as the subrings of that same structure. With df-prds 17507 it can actually reasonably perform the task, that is, being the product group given a family of groups, while also being the product ring given a family of rings. There is no contradiction here because the group part of a product ring is a product group. There is also a general theory of "substructure algebras", in the form of df-mre 17644 and df-acs 17647. SubGrp is a Moore collection, as is SubRing, SubRng and many other substructure collections. But it is not useful for picking out a particular collection of interest; SubRing and SubGrp still need to be defined and they are distinct --- nothing is going to select these definitions for us. Extensible structures only work well when they represent concrete categories, where there is a "base set", morphisms are functions, and subobjects are subsets with induced operations. In short, they primarily work well for "sets with (some) extra structure". Extensible structures may not suffice for more complicated situations. For example, in manifolds, ↾s would not work. That said, extensible structures are sufficient for many of the structures that set.mm currently considers, and offer a good compromise for a goal-oriented formalization.
7.1.1.1  Extensible structures as structures with components
Syntax	cstr 17193	Extend class notation with the class of structures with components numbered below 𝐴.
class Struct
Definition	df-struct 17194*	Define a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. This is not a requirement for groups, posets, etc., but it is a useful assumption for component extraction theorems. As mentioned in the section header, an "extensible structure should be implemented as a function (a set of ordered pairs)". The current definition, however, is less restrictive: it allows for classes which contain the empty set ∅ to be extensible structures. Because of 0nelfun 6596, such classes cannot be functions. Without the empty set, however, a structure must be a function, see structn0fun 17198: 𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}). Allowing an extensible structure to contain the empty set ensures that expressions like {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩} are structures without asserting or implying that 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶 and 𝐷 are sets (if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a proper class, then ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ∅, see opprc 4920). This is used critically in strle1 17205, strle2 17206, strle3 17207 and strleun 17204 to avoid sethood hypotheses on the "payload" sets: without this, ipsstr 17395 and theorems like it will have many sethood assumptions, and may not even be usable in the empty context. Instead, the sethood assumption is deferred until it is actually needed, e.g., ipsbase 17396, which requires that the base set be a set but not any of the other components. Usually, a concrete structure like ℂfld does not contain the empty set, and therefore is a function, see cnfldfun 21401. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Struct = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝑓 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝑓 ⊆ (...‘𝑥))}
Theorem	brstruct 17195	The structure relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Rel Struct
Theorem	isstruct2 17196	The property of being a structure with components in (1st ‘𝑋)...(2nd ‘𝑋). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ ( ≤ ∩ (ℕ × ℕ)) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (...‘𝑋)))
Theorem	structex 17197	A structure is a set. (Contributed by AV, 10-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 Struct 𝑋 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	structn0fun 17198	A structure without the empty set is a function. (Contributed by AV, 13-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	isstruct 17199	The property of being a structure with components in 𝑀...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩ ↔ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ∖ {∅}) ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁)))
Theorem	structcnvcnv 17200	Two ways to express the relational part of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Struct 𝑋 → ◡◡𝐹 = (𝐹 ∖ {∅}))