Theorem trlsfval 29952

Description: The set of trails (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
trlsfval	⊢ (Trails‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝐺,𝑝

Proof of Theorem trlsfval

Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		biidd 265	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Fun ◡𝑓 ↔ Fun ◡𝑓))
2		df-trls 29949	. 2 ⊢ Trails = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓)})
3	1, 2	fvmptopab 7455	1 ⊢ (Trails‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1563   class class class wbr 5105  {copab 5167  ^◡ccnv 5651  Fun wfun 6519  ‘cfv 6525  Walkscwlks 29855  Trailsctrls 29947

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5395

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1566  df-fal 1576  df-ex 1803  df-nf 1807  df-sb 2094  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3418  df-v 3459  df-dif 3910  df-un 3912  df-in 3914  df-ss 3924  df-nul 4289  df-if 4484  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-op 4592  df-uni 4869  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5547  df-xp 5658  df-rel 5659  df-cnv 5660  df-co 5661  df-dm 5662  df-iota 6481  df-fun 6527  df-fv 6533  df-trls 29949

This theorem is referenced by:  istrl  29953  upgrtrls  29958