ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  cc4f Unicode version

Theorem cc4f 7635
Description: Countable choice by showing the existence of a function 
f which can choose a value at each index 
n such that  ch holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
cc4f.cc  |-  ( ph  -> CCHOICE )
cc4f.1  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  V )
cc4f.a  |-  F/_ n A
cc4f.2  |-  ( ph  ->  N  ~~  om )
cc4f.3  |-  ( x  =  ( f `  n )  ->  ( ps 
<->  ch ) )
cc4f.m  |-  ( ph  ->  A. n  e.  N  E. x  e.  A  ps )
Assertion
Ref Expression
cc4f  |-  ( ph  ->  E. f ( f : N --> A  /\  A. n  e.  N  ch ) )
Distinct variable groups:    A, f, x   
f, N, n    ch, x    ph, f, n    ps, f    x, n
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x)    ps( x,  n)    ch( f,  n)    A( n)    N( x)    V( x,  f,  n)

Proof of Theorem cc4f
Dummy variable  w is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 cc4f.cc . . 3  |-  ( ph  -> CCHOICE )
2 cc4f.1 . . . . 5  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  V )
3 rabexg 4279 . . . . 5  |-  ( A  e.  V  ->  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  e.  _V )
42, 3syl 14 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  e.  _V )
54ralrimivw 2624 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A. n  e.  N  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  e.  _V )
6 cc4f.m . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  A. n  e.  N  E. x  e.  A  ps )
7 rabn0m 3549 . . . . 5  |-  ( E. w  w  e.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps }  <->  E. x  e.  A  ps )
87ralbii 2556 . . . 4  |-  ( A. n  e.  N  E. w  w  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps } 
<-> 
A. n  e.  N  E. x  e.  A  ps )
96, 8sylibr 134 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A. n  e.  N  E. w  w  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps } )
10 cc4f.2 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  N  ~~  om )
111, 5, 9, 10cc3 7634 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  E. f ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  (
f `  n )  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps } ) )
12 simprl 535 . . . . . 6  |-  ( (
ph  /\  ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } ) )  -> 
f  Fn  N )
13 elrabi 2979 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( ( f `  n )  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  ->  ( f `  n
)  e.  A )
1413ralimi 2613 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( A. n  e.  N  (
f `  n )  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  ->  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  A
)
1514ad2antll 495 . . . . . 6  |-  ( (
ph  /\  ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } ) )  ->  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n
)  e.  A )
16 nfcv 2392 . . . . . . 7  |-  F/_ n N
17 cc4f.a . . . . . . 7  |-  F/_ n A
18 nfcv 2392 . . . . . . 7  |-  F/_ n
f
1916, 17, 18ffnfvf 5867 . . . . . 6  |-  ( f : N --> A  <->  ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  A
) )
2012, 15, 19sylanbrc 421 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
ph  /\  ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } ) )  -> 
f : N --> A )
21 cc4f.3 . . . . . . . . 9  |-  ( x  =  ( f `  n )  ->  ( ps 
<->  ch ) )
2221elrab 2982 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( ( f `  n )  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  <->  ( ( f `  n
)  e.  A  /\  ch ) )
2322simprbi 275 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( f `  n )  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  ->  ch )
2423ralimi 2613 . . . . . 6  |-  ( A. n  e.  N  (
f `  n )  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps }  ->  A. n  e.  N  ch )
2524ad2antll 495 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
ph  /\  ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } ) )  ->  A. n  e.  N  ch )
2620, 25jca 306 . . . 4  |-  ( (
ph  /\  ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } ) )  -> 
( f : N --> A  /\  A. n  e.  N  ch ) )
2726ex 115 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } )  ->  (
f : N --> A  /\  A. n  e.  N  ch ) ) )
2827eximdv 1933 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  ( E. f ( f  Fn  N  /\  A. n  e.  N  ( f `  n )  e.  { x  e.  A  |  ps }
)  ->  E. f
( f : N --> A  /\  A. n  e.  N  ch ) ) )
2911, 28mpd 13 1  |-  ( ph  ->  E. f ( f : N --> A  /\  A. n  e.  N  ch ) )
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    <-> wb 105    = wceq 1402   E.wex 1545    e. wcel 2209   F/_wnfc 2379   A.wral 2528   E.wrex 2529   {crab 2532   _Vcvv 2821   class class class wbr 4130   omcom 4737    Fn wfn 5372   -->wf 5373   ` cfv 5377    ~~ cen 7020  CCHOICEwacc 7628
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-13 2211  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4246  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-iinf 4735
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-2nd 6375  df-er 6807  df-en 7023  df-cc 7629
This theorem is used by:  cc4  7636
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator